Optimal scale in the Italian gas distribution industry using data envelopment analysis

The Italian gas distribution industry presents a high degree of fragmentation. However, the tendency between 1970 and 1998 was a concentration process. Available evidence supports the thesis that local distributors have undertaken a process of scale enlargement. This raises the question of characteristics of returns to scale for such operators as well as the optimal scale at which they should operate. Returns to scale are analysed by data envelopment analysis (DEA) methodology. The results show that the output space in which DMUs attain a high level of scale efficiency is widespread, thus indicating an unexpected return to scale characterisation. Technology shows increasing returns only for the smallest units, but such an effect is rapidly exhausted in favour of a regime of constant returns to scale. The main managerial conclusion is that an improvement of productivity may be reached via an intensification of the merging process involving local distributors operating at a small scale. Moreover, the concentration process appears as an "attainable" objective since the critical dimension, which permits the exploitation of positive returns to scale, is quite small.

[1]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[2]  R. Färe,et al.  The Structure of Technical Efficiency , 1983 .

[3]  Finn R. Førsund,et al.  On the calculation of the scale elasticity in DEA models , 1996 .

[4]  Jean-Michel Guldmann Modeling the structure of gas distribution costs in urban areas , 1983 .

[5]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  DEA and its use in the regulation of water companies , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Giovanni Fraquelli,et al.  Costs, technology and ownership of gas distribution in Italy , 2000 .

[7]  Lennart Hjalmarsson,et al.  Are all Scales Optimal in DEA? Theory and Empirical Evidence , 2004 .

[8]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis , 1996 .

[9]  K. Salvanes,et al.  Productivity differences in multiple output industries: An empirical application to electricity distribution , 1994 .

[10]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Introduction to the theory and application of data envelopment analysis , 2001 .

[11]  Finn R. Førsund,et al.  Calculating scale elasticity in DEA models , 2004, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[12]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  The use of data envelopment analysis in the regulation of UK water utilities: Water distribution , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  John Cubbin,et al.  Regression versus data envelopment analysis for efficiency measurement: an application to the England and Wales regulated water industry , 1998 .

[14]  A. Charnes,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis Theory, Methodology and Applications , 1995 .

[15]  Catherine Waddams Price,et al.  Efficiency and ownership in electricity distribution: A non-parametric model of the Turkish experience , 1996 .

[16]  Subal C. Kumbhakar,et al.  Relative performance of public and private ownership under yardstick competition: electricity retail distribution , 1998 .

[17]  Kristiaan Kerstens,et al.  Estimating returns to scale using non-parametric deterministic technologies: A new method based on goodness-of-fit , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis , 1997 .

[19]  R. Banker Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis , 1984 .

[20]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  The Use of Categorical Variables in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1986 .

[21]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Estimation of returns to scale using data envelopment analysis , 1992 .

[22]  E. Claggett A cost function study of the providers of TVA power , 1994 .

[23]  J. Guldmann Economies of Scale and Natural Monopoly in Urban Utilities: The Case of Natural Gas Distribution , 2010 .

[24]  Kenneth R. MacLeod,et al.  A data envelopment analysis of gas utilities' efficiency , 2002 .