Use of continuous simulation model (COSIMAT) as a complementary tool to model sewer systems: a case study on the Paruck collector, Brussels, Belgium

Episodic Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) discharges effectively control the ecological status of receiving water bodies. Hydrodynamic models like the Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) are often used to model the CSO events. However, such detailed models are computationally demanding especially when a long-term simulation of a complex system is required. Considering this, we developed an alternative simple continuous simulation model (COSIMAT) using the SIMULINK™ module in MATLAB™ as a means of solving the issue of computational time associated with the detailed models. The COSIMAT model was tested against a detailed model set up on the SWMM. The Paruck collector – one of the major Collector of the Brussels’ sewer system was used as an example case. Results showed that the accuracy of the simplified COSIMAT model was comparable to that of the detailed hydrodynamic model (SWMM) with a significant reduction of computational time by a factor of 8. We believe such alternative approaches would be useful to replace a computationally demanding model component of an integrated modelling system of a complex sewer system.

[1]  Patrick Willems,et al.  A time series tool to support the multi-criteria performance evaluation of rainfall-runoff models , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[2]  J. Meirlaen Immission based real-time control of the integrated urban wastewater system , 2002 .

[3]  Alex K. Manda,et al.  Urbanization Effects on Watershed Hydrology and In-Stream Processes in the Southern United States , 2010 .

[4]  Bruno De Fraine,et al.  OpenMI-based integrated sediment transport modelling of the river Zenne, Belgium , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[5]  Z. Vojinovic Integrated urban water systems modelling with a simplified surrogate modular approach , 2008 .

[6]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations , 2007 .

[7]  Giorgio Mannina,et al.  Receiving water quality assessment: comparison between simplified and detailed integrated urban modelling approaches. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[8]  J. B. Gregersen,et al.  OpenMI: Open modelling interface , 2007 .

[9]  Keith Beven,et al.  The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. , 1992 .

[10]  Peter Krebs,et al.  Integrated Approaches in Urban Storm Drainage: Where Do We Stand? , 2005, Environmental management.

[11]  Christopher Zoppou,et al.  Review of urban storm water models , 2001, Environ. Model. Softw..

[12]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[13]  Zoran Kapelan,et al.  Assessing the combined effects of urbanisation and climate change on the river water quality in an integrated urban wastewater system in the UK. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[14]  P A Vanrolleghem,et al.  Deterministic modelling of integrated urban drainage systems. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[15]  C. Vélez,et al.  Optimization of Urban Wastewater Systems using Model Based Design and Control , 2008 .

[16]  C. Jacobson Identification and quantification of the hydrological impacts of imperviousness in urban catchments: a review. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[17]  S. Bergström,et al.  Principles and Confidence in Hydrological Modelling , 1991 .

[18]  Josette Garnier,et al.  Modeling historical changes in nutrient delivery and water quality of the Zenne River (1790s–2010): The role of land use, waterscape and urban wastewater management , 2013 .

[19]  Patrick Willems,et al.  Parsimonious Model for Combined Sewer Overflow Pollution , 2004 .