Disambiguation of ambiguous figures in the brain

Disambiguation refers to the ability to interpret ambiguous information in a sensible way, which is important in an ever-changing external environment. Disambiguation occurs when prior knowledge is given before an ambiguous stimulus is presented. For example, labeling a series of meaningless blobs as a “human body” can change the observer's perception. The aim of this experiment was to study the neural circuitry underlying disambiguation caused by prior knowledge. We presented to participants a series of meaningless blobs with different contextual information. As participants performed this task, we used magnetoencephalography to map the brain areas that were activated when participants perceived blobs as a human body. The participants were presented identical sets of blob stimuli, and were instructed that a human body would appear more frequently in the “high body” condition than in the “low body” condition. We found the blob stimuli were more frequently perceived as the human body when they were presented in the “high body” condition. Such contextual modulation correlated with activity in the extrastriate body area (EBA) and the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG). Furthermore, we observed that IFG activation preceded EBA activation. These findings suggest that top-down processing in the IFG plays a role in disambiguating ambiguous information and modifying an individual's perceptions.

[1]  Paul E. Downing,et al.  An event-related potential component sensitive to images of the human body , 2006, NeuroImage.

[2]  Charan Ranganath,et al.  Category expectation modulates baseline and stimulus-evoked activity in human inferotemporal cortex , 2009, Brain Research.

[3]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Expectation-Driven Changes in Cortical Functional Connectivity Influence Working Memory and Long-Term Memory Performance , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Where bottom-up meets top-down: neuronal interactions during perception and imagery. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Two distinct neural mechanisms for category-selective responses. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  J Sergent,et al.  Functional and anatomical decomposition of face processing: evidence from prosopagnosia and PET study of normal subjects. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[7]  C. Stern,et al.  Where vision meets memory: prefrontal-posterior networks for visual object constancy during categorization and recognition. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  L. Trahms,et al.  Looking for faces: Attention modulates early occipitotemporal object processing. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[9]  Denis Schluppeck,et al.  Neural responses to Mooney images reveal a modular representation of faces in human visual cortex , 2004, NeuroImage.

[10]  B. Kawin,et al.  How Movies Work , 1987 .

[11]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  How the brain learns to see objects and faces in an impoverished context , 1997, Nature.

[12]  P. Herr Priming Price: Prior Knowledge and Context Effects , 1989 .

[13]  R. Stark,et al.  Creativity and the brain: Uncovering the neural signature of conceptual expansion , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  Harald G. Wallbott In and out of context: Influences of facial expression and context information on emotion attributions , 1988 .

[15]  Kathleen A. Hansen,et al.  Effects of Prior Knowledge on Decisions Made Under Perceptual vs. Categorical Uncertainty , 2012, Front. Neurosci..

[16]  A. A. Ioannides,et al.  The timing of face selectivity and attentional modulation in visual processing , 2008, Neuroscience.

[17]  Giorgio Ganis,et al.  Visual imagery. , 2011, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[18]  Ethan M. Meyers,et al.  Contextually Evoked Object-Specific Responses in Human Visual Cortex , 2004, Science.

[19]  Olaf Blanke,et al.  Mental Imagery for Full and Upper Human Bodies: Common Right Hemisphere Activations and Distinct Extrastriate Activations , 2010, Brain Topography.

[20]  S. Kojima,et al.  Magnetoencephalographic study of the neural responses in body perception , 2010, Neuroscience Letters.

[21]  L. Deouell,et al.  Cognitive Neuroscience: Selective visual streaming in face recognition: evidence from developmental prosopagnosia , 1999 .

[22]  R N Henson,et al.  Mechanisms of top-down facilitation in perception of visual objects studied by FMRI. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[23]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[24]  S. Shinkareva,et al.  Neural representation of abstract and concrete concepts: A meta‐analysis of neuroimaging studies , 2010, Human brain mapping.

[25]  R. Kakigi,et al.  Neural processes of attentional inhibition of return traced with magnetoencephalography , 2008, Neuroscience.

[26]  M. Bar Visual objects in context , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[27]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Early MEG Activation Dynamics in the Left Temporal and Inferior Frontal Cortex Reflect Semantic Context Integration , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  Jérémie Mattout,et al.  Multivariate source prelocalization (MSP): Use of functionally informed basis functions for better conditioning the MEG inverse problem , 2005, NeuroImage.

[29]  A. Linksz Outlines of a Theory of the Light Sense. , 1965 .

[30]  S. Bentin,et al.  Meaningful processing of meaningless stimuli: The influence of perceptual experience on early visual processing of faces , 2002, Cognition.

[31]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Visual Imagery of Famous Faces: Effects of Memory and Attention Revealed by fMRI , 2002, NeuroImage.

[32]  R. Hari,et al.  Temporal dynamics of cortical representation for action. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  Skyler Dean,et al.  Mind's Eye , 1973 .

[35]  Semir Zeki,et al.  Splendors and Miseries of the Brain: Love, Creativity, and the Quest for Human Happiness , 2008 .

[36]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Multiple sparse priors for the M/EEG inverse problem , 2008, NeuroImage.

[37]  R. Dolan,et al.  The Kuleshov Effect: the influence of contextual framing on emotional attributions. , 2006, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[38]  R. Kana,et al.  Specialization and integration of brain responses to object recognition and location detection , 2012, Brain and behavior.

[39]  Richard Wiseman,et al.  Creativity and ease of ambiguous figural reversal. , 2011, British journal of psychology.

[40]  廣瀬雄一,et al.  Neuroscience , 2019, Workplace Attachments.

[41]  A. Ishai,et al.  Introduction Short-and Long-term Memory , 2022 .

[42]  A. Chun On the brain , 2007 .

[43]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[44]  F. Tong,et al.  The timing of perceptual decisions for ambiguous face stimuli in the human ventral visual cortex. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[45]  H. Riquelme Can People Creative in Imagery Interpret Ambiguous Figures Faster than People Less Creative in Imagery , 2002 .

[46]  Bryan Christie,et al.  Creating False Memories , 1997 .

[47]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Holistic Processing of Faces: Learning Effects with Mooney Faces , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[48]  R. Malach,et al.  Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  Karl J Friston,et al.  Anatomically informed basis functions in multisubject studies , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[50]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Recognition alters the spatial pattern of FMRI activation in early retinotopic cortex. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.