Impact of cooperative adaptive cruise control on multilane freeway merge capacity

ABSTRACT Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC) allows vehicles to exchange real-time operational information wirelessly, enabling vehicles to travel in strings with shorter than normal time gaps between adjacent vehicles and ultimately increasing the freeway capacity. This study is intended to investigate the impact of CACC vehicle string operation on the capacity of multilane freeway merge bottlenecks, commonly found at on-ramp merging areas on urban freeways. Simulation experiments were conducted using CACC car-following models derived from field test data, together with lane-changing models of CACC vehicles and manually driven vehicles, as well as a maximum CACC string length and inter-string time gap constraint. Simulation results reveal that the freeway capacity increases quadratically as the CACC market penetration increases, with a maximum value of 3080 veh/hr/lane at 100% market penetration. The disturbance from the on-ramp traffic causes the merge bottleneck and can reduce the freeway capacity by up to 13% but the bottleneck capacity still increases in a quadratic pattern as CACC market penetration becomes larger. The findings suggest that there is a need to implement advanced merging assistance systems with CACC at merge bottlenecks for achieving the capacity improvement comparable with the observations at homogeneous freeway segments.

[1]  Fred L. Hall,et al.  FREEWAY CAPACITY DROP AND THE DEFINITION OF CAPACITY , 1991 .

[2]  Bart van Arem,et al.  The Impact of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control on Traffic-Flow Characteristics , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[3]  Vicente Milanés Montero,et al.  Handling Cut-In Vehicles in Strings of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control Vehicles , 2016, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[4]  Steven E Shladover,et al.  Impacts of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control on Freeway Traffic Flow , 2012 .

[5]  Gordon F. Newell,et al.  A simplified car-following theory: a lower order model , 2002 .

[6]  Steven E Shladover,et al.  Modeling cooperative and autonomous adaptive cruise control dynamic responses using experimental data , 2014 .

[7]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Capacity Drop , 2015 .

[8]  Marcello Montanino,et al.  Thirty Years of Gipps’ Car-Following Model , 2012 .

[9]  Nathan H. Gartner,et al.  Collaborative merging strategy for freeway ramp operations in a connected and autonomous vehicles environment , 2017, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[10]  Helbing,et al.  Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[11]  Robert L. Bertini,et al.  OBSERVATIONS AT A FREEWAY BOTTLENECK , 1999 .

[12]  Baher Abdulhai,et al.  Traffic capacity implications of automated vehicles mixed with regular vehicles , 2018, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[13]  Steven E. Shladover,et al.  Connected and automated vehicle systems: Introduction and overview , 2018, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[14]  Nikolaos Geroliminis,et al.  Empirical observations of capacity drop in freeway merges with ramp control and integration in a first-order model , 2013 .

[15]  Christopher Nowakowski,et al.  Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control , 2015 .

[16]  Dali Wei,et al.  An Enhanced Microscopic Traffic Simulation Model for Application to Connected Automated Vehicles , 2017 .

[17]  Michael A. Shulman,et al.  Refining the CAMP Crash Alert Timing Approach by Examining "Last Second" Braking and Lane Change Maneuvers under Various Kinematic Conditions , 2003 .

[18]  Sam Yagar,et al.  Exploration of the Breakdown Phenomenon in Freeway Traffic , 1998 .

[19]  Urbano Nunes,et al.  Multiplatooning Leaders Positioning and Cooperative Behavior Algorithms of Communicant Automated Vehicles for High Traffic Capacity , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[20]  James H Banks,et al.  TWO-CAPACITY PHENOMENON AT FREEWAY BOTTLENECKS: A BASIS FOR RAMP METERING? , 1991 .

[21]  Mohammed Hadi,et al.  Evaluation of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC) Vehicles on Managed Lanes Utilizing Macroscopic and Mesoscopic Simulation , 2016 .

[22]  Michael J. Cassidy,et al.  Increasing Capacity of an Isolated Merge by Metering its On-Ramp , 2004 .

[23]  İsmail Şahin,et al.  Empirical Study of Behavioral Theory of Traffic Flow , 2008 .

[24]  Pravin Varaiya,et al.  Smart cars on smart roads: problems of control , 1991, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[25]  Martijn van Noort,et al.  Modelling cooperative driving in congestion shockwaves on a freeway network , 2011, 2011 14th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[26]  Jean-Paul M. Arnaout,et al.  Exploring the effects of cooperative adaptive cruise control on highway traffic flow using microscopic traffic simulation , 2014 .

[27]  Xiao-Yun Lu,et al.  COOPERATIVE ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL (CACC) DEFINITIONS AND OPERATING CONCEPTS , 2015 .