Environmental Performance Analysis of Eco‐Industrial Parks in China: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach

In pursuit of more sustainable development of industry, China has been actively developing eco‐industrial parks (EIPs) for more than a decade. However, the environmental value of these EIPs remains largely unverified. This study aimed to evaluate the environmental performance of national EIPs in China using data envelopment analysis. Eco‐efficiency and environmental performance indices were used to represent the static and dynamic environmental performance of EIPs, respectively. An environmental performance index was formed by combining measures of eco‐efficiency in a dynamic setting with the sequential Malmquist index approach. We obtained three main empirical findings. First, 34 national EIPs exhibited a cumulative environmental performance improvement of 89.4% from 2007 to 2010, which is primarily the result of eco‐efficiency change rather than environmental technical change. Second, compared with the trial EIPs, the demonstration EIPs had a higher average eco‐efficiency (0.611 vs. 0.446 in 2010) and experienced greater average environmental performance improvement (129% vs. 60%). Third, the EIPs retrofitted from high‐tech industrial development zones exhibited much higher average eco‐efficiency (0.798 vs. 0.440 in 2010) than those retrofitted from economic and technical development zones. The key measures supporting the performance improvement and policy implications for the development of EIPs are also discussed.

[1]  Eugenia Nissi,et al.  Monitoring environmental efficiency: An application to Italian provinces , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[2]  Helen H. Lou,et al.  Environmental impact assessment of different design schemes of an industrial ecosystem , 2007 .

[3]  J. A. Gómez-Limón,et al.  Assessing farming eco-efficiency: a Data Envelopment Analysis approach. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[4]  Almas Heshmati,et al.  A sequential Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index : Environmentally sensitive productivity growth considering the progressive nature of technology , 2010 .

[5]  Yiping Fang,et al.  Value flow analysis based on EAP industrial chain: case of Huaning in Xichang, Sichuan , 2009 .

[6]  L. B. E. Veiga,et al.  Eco-industrial park development in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: a tool for sustainable development , 2009 .

[7]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Emergy analysis of an industrial park: the case of Dalian, China. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[8]  Hung‐Suck Park,et al.  Ulsan Eco‐industrial Park: Challenges and Opportunities , 2007 .

[9]  Wei Liu,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions in China's eco-industrial parks: a case study of the Beijing Economic Technological Development Area , 2014 .

[10]  Rong Qin,et al.  Industrial sustainability in China: practice and prospects for eco-industrial development. , 2007, Journal of environmental management.

[11]  Shunsuke Managi,et al.  Are there increasing returns to pollution abatement? Empirical analytics of the Environmental Kuznets Curve in pesticides , 2006 .

[12]  W. Vermeulen,et al.  Eco-industrial park initiatives in the USA and the Netherlands: first lessons , 2004 .

[13]  Robert U. Ayres,et al.  A Handbook of Industrial Ecology , 2002 .

[14]  Jo P Dewulf,et al.  Quantitative assessment of solid waste treatment systems in the industrial ecology perspective by exergy analysis. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  Hans Bressers,et al.  Productivity growth and environmental regulations - accounting for undesirable outputs: Analysis of China's thirty provincial regions using the Malmquist–Luenberger index , 2011 .

[16]  L. R. Christensen,et al.  THE ECONOMIC THEORY OF INDEX NUMBERS AND THE MEASUREMENT OF INPUT, OUTPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY , 1982 .

[17]  Dong-hyun Oh.  A metafrontier approach for measuring an environmentally sensitive productivity growth index , 2010 .

[18]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries , 1994 .

[19]  J. Bi,et al.  Eco-efficiency analysis of industrial system in China: A data envelopment analysis approach , 2008 .

[20]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Measuring Eco‐efficiency of Production with Data Envelopment Analysis , 2005 .

[21]  Jinping Tian,et al.  Assessment of industrial metabolisms of sulfur in a Chinese fine chemical industrial park , 2012 .

[22]  F. Boons,et al.  Eco-industrial parks : stimulating sustainable development in mixed industrial parks , 2002 .

[23]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Eco‐efficiency and Its xsTerminology , 2005 .

[24]  Zhang Hui.  Study on the fuzzy analytic hierarchy integrated evaluation method of Eco-Industrial Parks , 2011 .

[25]  David Gibbs,et al.  Reflections on implementing industrial ecology through eco-industrial park development , 2007 .

[26]  Laurens Cherchye,et al.  An Introduction to ‘Benefit of the Doubt’ Composite Indicators , 2007 .

[27]  Jinping Tian,et al.  China's Quest for Eco-industrial Parks, Part II: Reflections on a Decade of Exploration , 2012 .

[28]  R. Shepherd.  Theory of cost and production functions , 1970 .

[29]  M. Kortelainen,et al.  Dynamic environmental performance analysis: A Malmquist index approach , 2008 .

[30]  Yong Geng,et al.  Carbon footprint evaluation at industrial park level: A hybrid life cycle assessment approach , 2013 .

[31]  Isabelle Piot-Lepetit,et al.  Productivity and environmental regulation: the effect of the nitrates directive in the French pig sector , 2007 .

[32]  Murat Mirata,et al.  Experiences from early stages of a national industrial symbiosis programme in the UK: determinants and coordination challenges , 2004 .

[33]  Paul V. Preckel,et al.  Is Agricultural Productivity in Developing Countries Really Shrinking? New Evidence Using a Modified Nonparametric Approach , 2003 .

[34]  Shizuka Hashimoto,et al.  Quantitative assessment of urban and industrial symbiosis in Kawasaki, Japan. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[35]  Jinping Tian,et al.  China's Quest for Eco-industrial Parks, Part II , 2012 .

[36]  Raymond R. Tan,et al.  Emergy-based fuzzy optimization approach for water reuse in an eco-industrial park , 2011 .

[37]  L. Sokka,et al.  Quantifying the total environmental impacts of an industrial symbiosis - a comparison of process-, hybrid and input-output life cycle assessment. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[38]  C. Lovell,et al.  The Decomposition of Malmquist Productivity Indexes , 2003 .

[39]  J. Ehrenfeld,et al.  Industrial Ecology in Practice: The Evolution of Interdependence at Kalundborg , 1997 .

[40]  Gjergj Dodbiba,et al.  A novel approach for evaluating the performance of eco-industrial park pilot projects , 2013 .

[41]  Tsuyoshi Fujita,et al.  Industrial and urban symbiosis in Japan: analysis of the Eco-Town Program 1997-2006. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[42]  Wei Liu,et al.  Study of the performance of eco-industrial park development in China , 2014 .

[43]  Peng Zhou,et al.  A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[44]  Marian Chertow,et al.  INDUSTRIAL SYMBIOSIS: Literature and Taxonomy , 2000 .

[45]  Tsuyoshi Fujita,et al.  Econometric analysis of the performance of recycling projects in Japanese Eco-Towns , 2012 .

[46]  Li Wenbo.  Comprehensive evaluation research on circular economic performance of eco-industrial parks , 2011 .