Experimental Study of Magnetorheological Dampers and Application to Cable Vibration Control

As primary members of cable-stayed bridges, cables are susceptible to vibrations because of their low intrinsic damping. Mechanical dampers have been used to improve cable damping. Magnetorheological (MR) dampers have been proven efficient for seismic applications because of their large output damping forces, stable performance, low power requirement, and quick response from both laboratory research and field practice. In this paper, experimental work was carried out to demonstrate that MR dampers are also suitable for cable vibration control. First, a MR damper was tested with various test parameters to obtain the performance curves of the MR damper under different loading conditions, including different electric currents, loading frequencies, loading wave types, and working temperatures. The MR damper was then installed on a cable to reduce the cable vibration. A 7.16 m long stay cable with a prototype-to-model scale factor of 8 was established for this study. The frequencies of the stay cable under different tension forces were measured and compared with those obtained through theoretical calculations. Then, a free vibration control test was carried out with the MR damper being installed at the 1/4 point of the cable. In the forced vibration test, a shaker was installed at 0.18 m from the lower end of the cable. The measured data show that the damper is efficient for cable vibration control within its working current range (zero to maximum) although there is a saturation effect. It was also observed that the damper could reduce cable vibration under a variety of excitation frequencies, especially for resonant vibrations.

[1]  J. L. Sproston,et al.  Non-Linear Identification of an Electro-Rheological Vibration Damper , 1985 .

[2]  Worsak Kanok-Nukulchai Cable-stayed bridges : experiences & practice : proceedings of the International Conference on Cable-Stayed Bridges, Bangkok, Thailand, November 18-20, 1987 , 1987 .

[3]  J. L. Sproston,et al.  Non-linear modelling of an electro-rheological vibration damper , 1987 .

[4]  Olivier Flamand,et al.  Rain-wind induced vibration of cables , 1995 .

[5]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Modeling and Control of Magnetorheological Dampers for Seismic Response Reduction , 1996 .

[6]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Seismic Response Reduction Using Magnetorheological Dampers , 1996 .

[7]  W J Angelo LASERS ENSURE STAY CABLE SAFETY , 1997 .

[8]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  PHENOMENOLOGICAL MODEL FOR MAGNETORHEOLOGICAL DAMPERS , 1997 .

[9]  A T Ciolko,et al.  AN IMMEDIATE PAYOFF FROM FHWA'S NDE INITIATIVE , 1999 .

[10]  Habib Tabatabai,et al.  DESIGN OF MECHANICAL VISCOUS DAMPERS FOR STAY CABLES , 2000 .

[11]  W. Lo,et al.  Dynamic properties of a stay cable incorporated with magneto-rheological fluid dampers , 2000 .

[12]  Habib Tabatabai,et al.  TUNED DAMPERS AND CABLE FILLERS FOR SUPPRESSION OF BRIDGE STAY CABLE VIBRATIONS , 2000 .

[13]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Experimental verification of multiinput seismic control strategies for smart dampers , 2001 .

[14]  Osamu Yoshida,et al.  Torsional Response Control of Asymmetric Buildings Using Smart Dampers , 2002 .

[15]  Nicholas P. Jones,et al.  Free Vibrations of Taut Cable with Attached Damper. I: Linear Viscous Damper , 2002 .