The potential and challenges of inferring thermal comfort at home using commodity sensors

For decades, researchers have investigated ways to infer human thermal comfort. Studies have usually required cumbersome sensors and human observers, making them inappropriate for use in naturalistic settings such as the home. Emerging wearable and smart home sensing devices offer the opportunity to develop new models of thermal comfort based on data collected in-situ. To explore this opportunity, we deployed a sensing system in seven homes and collected self-report data from 11 participants for four weeks. Our system captures many factors employed in previous thermal comfort research, as well as new factors (e.g., activity level, sweat level). Machine learning-based models derived from the collected data show improvement over previous techniques, however significant prediction errors remain. In analyzing these errors we identify six problems that pose challenges for inferring comfort in the wild. Based on our findings, we suggest techniques to improve future in-situ thermal comfort modeling efforts.

[1]  Michael A. Humphreys,et al.  ADAPTIVE THERMAL COMFORT AND SUSTAINABLE THERMAL STANDARDS FOR BUILDINGS , 2002 .

[2]  R. Burnett,et al.  It's about time: A comparison of Canadian and American time–activity patterns† , 2002, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[3]  T. Rex A practical guide to the American Community Survey (5-year estimates) , 2010 .

[4]  P. O. Fanger,et al.  Thermal comfort: analysis and applications in environmental engineering, , 1972 .

[5]  Joel M. Hektner,et al.  Experience sampling method , 2007 .

[6]  Romain Nouvel,et al.  A novel personalized thermal comfort control, responding to user sensation feedbacks , 2012 .

[7]  Scott E. Crouter,et al.  Validity of Consumer-Based Physical Activity Monitors for Estimating Energy Expenditure in Youth , 2017 .

[8]  Mark W. Newman,et al.  A field study comparing approaches to collecting annotated activity data in real-world settings , 2015, UbiComp.

[9]  J. Thorshauge,et al.  Air-velocity fluctuations in the occupied zone of ventilated spaces , 1982 .

[10]  Senén Barro,et al.  Do we need hundreds of classifiers to solve real world classification problems? , 2014, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[11]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Principles of mixed-initiative user interfaces , 1999, CHI '99.

[12]  Adrian Friday,et al.  Understanding adaptive thermal comfort: new directions for UbiComp , 2013, UbiComp.

[13]  Steven K. Firth,et al.  A Comparison of Calculated and Subjective Thermal Comfort Sensation in Home and Office Environment , 2011 .

[14]  Gregory J Welk,et al.  Validity of consumer-based physical activity monitors. , 2014, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[15]  Ratul Mahajan,et al.  HomeLab: shared infrastructure for home technology field studies , 2012, UbiComp.

[16]  Mark Standeven,et al.  Thermal comfort for free-running buildings , 1996 .

[17]  Dimitris Kanellopoulos,et al.  Handling imbalanced datasets: A review , 2006 .

[18]  R. Dear,et al.  Thermal adaptation in the built environment: a literature review , 1998 .

[19]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Experience Sampling Method: Measuring the Quality of Everyday Life , 2006 .

[20]  Ye Xu,et al.  Community Similarity Networks , 2013, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[21]  Liming Chen,et al.  Activity Recognition: Approaches, Practices and Trends , 2011 .

[22]  Fariborz Haghighat,et al.  A Learning Machine Approach for Predicting Thermal Comfort Indices , 2005 .

[23]  E. Shove Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organization of Normality , 2003 .

[24]  Byron W. Jones Capabilities and limitations of thermal models for use in thermal comfort standards , 2002 .

[25]  Dawei Song,et al.  Improving search personalisation with dynamic group formation , 2014, SIGIR.

[26]  Joseph A. Paradiso,et al.  Personalized HVAC control system , 2010, 2010 Internet of Things (IOT).

[27]  Jesse Hoey,et al.  Activity Recognition in Pervasive Intelligent Environments , 2011 .

[28]  Eibe Frank,et al.  A Simple Approach to Ordinal Classification , 2001, ECML.

[29]  J. F. Nicol,et al.  The validity of ISO-PMV for predicting comfort votes in every-day thermal environments , 2002 .

[30]  J D Hardy,et al.  Comfort and thermal sensations and associated physiological responses at various ambient temperatures. , 1967, Environmental research.

[31]  Srinivasan Keshav,et al.  SPOT: a smart personalized office thermal control system , 2013, e-Energy '13.