The distance decay of similarity in ecological communities

Biological similartiy typically decreases with geographical distance. Despite the recent attention to the distance decay relationship, there is no consensus on how the relationship varies across organism groups, geographic gradients and environments. We first conducted a quantitative meta-analysis of 401 distance decay relationships across a wide range of organisms, ecosystems and geographical gradients, and then united the effects of categorical and continuous variables on the rate of distance decay using a general linear model (GLM). As effect sizes we used the similarity at one km distance (initial similarity) and the distance that halves the similarity from its value at one km distance (halving distance). Both the initial similarity and halving distance were significantly affected by variables characterizing the spatial scale, organism properties, study region and ecosystem concerned. The patterns appear robust as the results of meta-analysis and GLM only differed in marginal details. According to GLM with Akaike’s information criterion, the most parsimonious models explained 55.3 and 37.6% of variance in initial similarity and halving distance, respectively. Across large scales, similarity was decreasing slightly faster at high latitudes than at low latitudes, while small-scale turnover was higher at low latitudes. We also found significant differences in initial similarity among the realms, with terrestrial systems showing higher small-scale beta diversity. The decrease in community similarity at large scales was higher among organisms that are actively mobile than among passively dispersed organisms. We conclude that regression of similarity against distance unites several ecological phenomena such as dispersal propensity and environmental structuring, and provides an effective approach for gauging the spatial turnover across sites. We also found that the patterns in beta-diversity are highly scale-dependent.

[1]  Kalle Ruokolainen,et al.  Dispersal, Environment, and Floristic Variation of Western Amazonian Forests , 2003, Science.

[2]  Á. Duque,et al.  Different floristic patterns of woody understorey and canopy plants in Colombian Amazonia , 2002, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[3]  A. Shmida,et al.  Biological determinants of species diversity , 1985 .

[4]  H. Hillebrand,et al.  The imprint of the geographical, evolutionary and ecological context on species-area relationships. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[5]  W. Tobler A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region , 1970 .

[6]  John H. Lawton,et al.  Beta diversity on geographic gradients in Britain , 1992 .

[7]  S. Hubbell,et al.  The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography at age ten. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[8]  P. White,et al.  The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology , 1999 .

[9]  James H. Brown,et al.  Turnover Rates in Insular Biogeography: Effect of Immigration on Extinction , 1977 .

[10]  C. Townsend,et al.  A truce with neutral theory: local deterministic factors, species traits and dispersal limitation together determine patterns of diversity in stream invertebrates. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[11]  G. C. Stevens The Latitudinal Gradient in Geographical Range: How so Many Species Coexist in the Tropics , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[12]  Hanna Tuomisto,et al.  Effects of mesoscale environmental heterogeneity and dispersal limitation on floristic variation in rain forest ferns , 2006 .

[13]  J. Hughes,et al.  A taxa–area relationship for bacteria , 2004, Nature.

[14]  James H. Brown,et al.  Effects of size and temperature on developmental time , 2002, Nature.

[15]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology , 2004 .

[16]  R. Mac Nally,et al.  Spatial autocorrelation of assemblages of benthic invertebrates and its relationship to environmental factors in two upland rivers in southeastern Australia , 2005 .

[17]  Stephen P. Hubbell,et al.  Beta-Diversity in Tropical Forest Trees , 2002, Science.

[18]  M. Willig,et al.  Gradients of species density and turnover in marsupials : A hemispheric perspective , 1997 .

[19]  R. Poulin The decay of similarity with geographical distance in parasite communities of vertebrate hosts , 2003 .

[20]  Robert I. McDonald,et al.  Species compositional similarity and ecoregions: Do ecoregion boundaries represent zones of high species turnover? , 2005 .

[21]  J. Soininen,et al.  Benthic diatom communities in boreal streams: community structure in relation to environmental and spatial gradients , 2004 .

[22]  M. Oliva,et al.  The decay of similarity over geographical distance in parasite communities of marine fishes , 2005 .

[23]  Jérôme Chave,et al.  Neutral theory and community ecology , 2004 .

[24]  L. Hedges,et al.  Meta-analysis: Combining the results of independent experiments , 1993 .

[25]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  The geographical structure of British bird distributions: diversity, spatial turnover and scale , 2001 .

[26]  M. Westoby,et al.  Spatial scaling of microbial eukaryote diversity , 2004, Nature.

[27]  Jens-Christian Svenning,et al.  Diversity and dominance in palm (Arecaceae) communities in terra firme forests in the western Amazon basin , 2004 .

[28]  T. Fenchel,et al.  Global diversity and body size , 1996, Nature.

[29]  R. Ricklefs,et al.  Beta diversity of angiosperms in temperate floras of eastern Asia and eastern North America , 2004 .

[30]  T. Hughes,et al.  Coral reef diversity refutes the neutral theory of biodiversity , 2006, Nature.

[31]  David M. J. S. Bowman,et al.  Diversity Patterns of Woody Species on a Latitudinal Transect From the Monsoon Tropics to Desert in the Northern Territory, Australia , 1996 .

[32]  E. Ezcurra,et al.  Biogeographic regions and β-diversity of woody dryland legumes in the Baja California peninsula , 2003 .

[33]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2000 .

[34]  Karl Cottenie,et al.  Integrating environmental and spatial processes in ecological community dynamics. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[35]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments , 1993 .

[36]  Dean L. Urban,et al.  Beta Diversity and Nature Reserve System Design in the Yukon, Canada , 2005 .

[37]  James H. Brown,et al.  Microbial biogeography: putting microorganisms on the map , 2006, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[38]  R. Peters The Ecological Implications of Body Size , 1983 .

[39]  Benjamin Gilbert,et al.  Neutrality, niches, and dispersal in a temperate forest understory. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  Helmut Hillebrand,et al.  On the Generality of the Latitudinal Diversity Gradient , 2004, The American Naturalist.