Four-dimensional inversion of resistivity monitoring data through Lp norm minimizations

SUMMARY A new 4-D inversion algorithm is developed so that any data misfits and model roughness in the space and time domains can be selectively minimized, in terms of either the L1 norm or the L2 norm. This study is motivated by the experience that a 4-D inversion adopting full L2 norm minimization may sometimes result in a model that is too smoothly varying with time. It is further encouraged by the realization that a particular criterion of either L1 or L2 norm cannot be universally optimal for accurately reconstructing the subsurface condition. In addition, we try to overcome difficulties of jointly choosing two optimal regularization parameters in space and time domains. To achieve this, we devise automatic determination methods, not only of the Lagrangian multipliers for the space-domain smoothness constraint, but also of the regularization parameter for penalizing the model roughness along the time axis. Both kinds of regularization parameters are actively updated at each iteration, according to variations in data misfit and model roughness. We conducted inversion experiments using synthetic and field monitoring data to test the proposed algorithms, and further to compare the performance of L1 and L2 norm minimizations. Both the synthetic and field data experiments demonstrated that the proposed automatic determination method produced ground changes that were more similar to the true changes than those of approaches using pre-determined parameter values. Inversion experiments showed that L1 norm minimization of the time-domain roughness could reduce the problem of overly smooth model changes when the subsurface changes are locally confined, but that the L2 norm approach would be more reasonable when the changes are expected to be widespread.

[1]  L. Bentley,et al.  Simultaneous time-lapse electrical resistivity inversion , 2011 .

[2]  R. V. Dam,et al.  Hydrological consequences of land-cover change: Quantifying the influence of plants on soil moisture with time-lapse electrical resistivity , 2010 .

[3]  Abelardo Ramirez,et al.  Electrical resistance tomography during in-situ trichloroethylene remediation at the Savannah River Site , 1995 .

[4]  D. Oldenburg,et al.  A comparison of automatic techniques for estimating the regularization parameter in non-linear inverse problems , 2004 .

[5]  R. Wolke,et al.  Iteratively Reweighted Least Squares: Algorithms, Convergence Analysis, and Numerical Comparisons , 1988 .

[6]  J. G. Kim,et al.  4-D inversion of DC resistivity monitoring data acquired over a dynamically changing earth model , 2009 .

[7]  Andrew Binley,et al.  Electrical resistance tomography. , 2000 .

[8]  Birgit Jochum,et al.  A complex geo-scientific strategy for landslide hazard mitigation – from airborne mapping to ground monitoring , 2008 .

[9]  Kamini Singha,et al.  Effects of spatially variable resolution on field-scale estimates of tracer concentration from electrical inversions using Archie’s law , 2006 .

[10]  D. Oldenburg,et al.  NON-LINEAR INVERSION USING GENERAL MEASURES OF DATA MISFIT AND MODEL STRUCTURE , 1998 .

[11]  Andreas Kemna,et al.  Time-lapse three-dimensional inversion of complex conductivity data using an active time constrained (ATC) approach , 2011 .

[12]  Jung-Ho Kim,et al.  Enhancing the resolving power of least‐squares inversion with active constraint balancing , 2003 .

[13]  T. Günther,et al.  Three‐dimensional modelling and inversion of dc resistivity data incorporating topography – II. Inversion , 2006 .

[14]  M. Loke,et al.  Time-lapse resistivity imaging inversion , 1999 .

[15]  Douglas LaBrecque,et al.  Difference Inversion of ERT Data: a Fast Inversion Method for 3-D In Situ Monitoring , 2001 .

[16]  Colin Farquharson,et al.  Constructing piecewise-constant models in multidimensional minimum-structure inversions , 2008 .

[17]  Dale F. Rucker,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING OF LEAKS USING TIME LAPSED LONG ELECTRODE ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY , 2009 .

[18]  Frederick D. Day-Lewis,et al.  Time‐lapse inversion of crosswell radar data , 2002 .

[19]  Yiheng Zhang,et al.  An analytical comparison of three spatio-temporal regularization methods for dynamic linear inverse problems in a common statistical framework , 2005 .

[20]  A. Binley,et al.  Cross-hole electrical imaging of a controlled saline tracer injection , 2000 .

[21]  U. Yaramanci Geoelectric exploration and monitoring in rock salt for the safety assessment of underground waste disposal sites , 2000 .

[22]  Jungho Kim,et al.  Tracing solute infiltration using a combined method of dye tracer test and electrical resistivity tomography in an undisturbed forest soil profile , 2010 .

[23]  Panagiotis Tsourlos,et al.  4D active time constrained resistivity inversion , 2011 .

[24]  W. Menke Geophysical data analysis : discrete inverse theory , 1984 .

[25]  I. Cho,et al.  Time-lapse inversion of 2D resistivity monitoring data with a spatially varying cross-model constraint , 2011 .

[26]  R. Parker,et al.  Occam's inversion; a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data , 1987 .

[27]  Mark A. Lukas,et al.  Comparing parameter choice methods for regularization of ill-posed problems , 2011, Math. Comput. Simul..