Google Docs in the Classroom: A District-wide Case Study

Background/Context Successful integration of educational technology is a complicated process that is influenced by multiple factors. Recently, both within and across schools, educators have been searching for cloud-based solutions to address the challenges of integrating educational technology into their school systems—assessing whether these programs are affordable, accessible, and well-suited to improve learning. While the popularity of cloud-based applications among educational institutions and students is rapidly increasing due to their enhanced sharing features, accessibility, and cost-efficiency, there have been few efforts to investigate the impacts of these cloud-based applications in educational settings, especially in K-12 settings. Purpose/Objective This paper examines how Google Docs, one of the most popular cloud-based software applications, is integrated into middle-school English Language Arts (ELA) classrooms in a school district with a laptop initiative. Specifically, this case study attempts to understand the contemporary challenges of implementing the collaborative web-based tool and its accompanying opportunities, as well as the contextual factors for its implementation within the district. Research Design This qualitative study followed a grounded approach to data analysis. Using primarily initial coding and thematic coding methods, we analyzed interviews, surveys (from 2,152 students and 25 teachers), classroom observations, and student documents collected over the course of the 2011–2012 academic year. Analysis revealed three key themes (access and workability, cost and practicality, and affordances for writing), as well as the contextual factors of Google Docs implementation (the district's focus on instructional goals and professional development). Conclusion/Recommendations Our case study suggests that the introduction of cloud-based tools was perceived by students, teachers, and district officials to make technology use more accessible and convenient, to enhance cost-efficiency and productivity, and, most importantly, to provide ample affordances for writing practice and instruction. The district-wide implementation of Google Docs provided broad, accessible, and affordable simultaneous access to students and teachers, while increasing their opportunities to improve writing skills through features such as feedback, revision history, and reader selection. We also identified key contextual factors that contributed to these favorable outcomes, such as the district's focus on curricular integration and professional development. As one of the few studies that explores cloud-based tools’ usability and benefits in K-12 settings, we hope to help school districts make informed decisions about adopting these applications for instruction. Though the particularities of context need to be taken into account, the case study nevertheless reveals a cloud-based environment's salient affordances for learning in a district-wide implementation context.

[1]  Doris Dippold Peer feedback through blogs: Student and teacher perceptions in an advanced german class , 2009, ReCALL.

[2]  B. Cope,et al.  Technology-Mediated Writing Assessments: Principles and Processes , 2011 .

[3]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Middle School Students’ Writing and Feedback in a Cloud-Based Classroom Environment , 2015, Technol. Knowl. Learn..

[4]  Fethi A. Inan,et al.  Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: a path model , 2010 .

[5]  Stephen G. Sheldon,et al.  Conditions for Classroom Technology Innovations , 2002, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[6]  Alan Hirvela Collaborative Writing Instruction and Communities of Readers and Writers , 1999 .

[7]  Athanassios Jimoyiannis,et al.  Preparing Teachers to Integrate Web 2.0 in School Practice: Toward a Framework for Pedagogy 2.0. , 2013 .

[8]  Laura M. O’Dwyer,et al.  Measuring Teachers’ Technology Uses , 2004 .

[9]  Tina N. Hohlfeld,et al.  Examining the digital divide in K-12 public schools: Four-year trends for supporting ICT literacy in Florida , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[10]  R Ruurd Taconis,et al.  Analysing teacher knowledge for technology education in primary schools , 2012 .

[11]  Vikas Kumar,et al.  Cost benefit analysis of cloud computing in education , 2018, Int. J. Bus. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Lisa Zawilinski HOT Blogging: A Framework for Blogging to Promote Higher Order Thinking , 2009 .

[13]  Matsuko Woo,et al.  Using a Wiki to Scaffold Primary-School Students' Collaborative Writing , 2011, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[14]  Chao-hsiu Chen Why Do Teachers Not Practice What They Believe Regarding Technology Integration? , 2008 .

[15]  D. G. Chandra,et al.  Cost benefit analysis of cloud computing in education , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Computing, Communication and Applications.

[16]  Andreas Lund,et al.  Wikis: a collective approach to language production , 2008, ReCALL.

[17]  Kevin R. Parker,et al.  Wiki as a Teaching Tool , 2007 .

[18]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[19]  T. Levin,et al.  Teachers’ Views on Factors Affecting Effective Integration of Information Technology in the Classroom: Developmental Scenery , 2008 .

[20]  L. Lewis Teachers’ Use of Educational Technology in U.S. Public Schools: 2009 , 2010 .

[21]  S. Abrams,et al.  Constellations of Support and Impediment: Understanding Early Implementation Dynamics in the Research and Development of an Online Multimodal Writing and Peer Review Environment , 2013 .

[22]  Johnny Saldaña,et al.  The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers , 2009 .

[23]  Eric N. Wiebe,et al.  Cloud computing adoption and usage in community colleges , 2011, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[24]  Catherine Schifter Infusing Technology into the Classroom: Continuous Practice Improvement , 2008 .

[25]  M. Warschauer,et al.  Technology and Equity in Schooling: Deconstructing the Digital Divide , 2004 .

[26]  Nabil Sultan,et al.  loud computing for education : A new dawn ? , 2009 .

[27]  Shelbie D. Witte,et al.  “That's Online Writing, Not Boring School Writing”: Writing With Blogs and the Talkback Project , 2007 .

[28]  E. Wenger Supporting communities of practice A survey of community-oriented technologies , 2002 .

[29]  David M. Kennedy,et al.  MEDIAWIKI AND GOOGLE DOCS AS ONLINE COLLABORATION TOOLS FOR GROUP PROJECT CO-CONSTRUCTION , 2009 .

[30]  P. Mell,et al.  The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing , 2011 .

[31]  Steven M. Ross,et al.  The influence of a peer-tutoring training model for implementing cooperative groupings with elementary students , 2001 .

[32]  E. Soloway,et al.  No Access, No Use, No Impact , 2003 .

[33]  Stephen L. Wasby,et al.  On Preparing Teachers , 1971, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[34]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[35]  Diana Baader Teaching With Technology Creating Student Centered Classrooms , 2016 .

[36]  David Buckingham,et al.  Media education goes digital: an introduction , 2007 .

[37]  Laurence Rogers,et al.  Developing successful pedagogy with information and communications technology: how are science teachers meeting the challenge? , 2004 .

[38]  Gavin Bell,et al.  Building Social Web Applications , 2009 .

[39]  P. Twining Oversold and underused: computers in the classroom , 2002 .

[40]  Martha C. Pennington Positive and negative potentials of word processing for ESL writers , 1991 .

[41]  Joan E. Hughes,et al.  The Role of Teacher Knowledge and Learning Experiences in Forming Technology-Integrated Pedagogy , 2005 .

[42]  Rik Hunter,et al.  Erasing “Property Lines”: A Collaborative Notion of Authorship and Textual Ownership on a Fan Wiki , 2011 .

[43]  Jay O'Leary Going one on one , 1993 .

[44]  Johan van Braak,et al.  Individual Characteristics Influencing Teachers' Class Use of Computers. , 2001 .

[45]  E. Brink,et al.  Constructing grounded theory : A practical guide through qualitative analysis , 2006 .

[46]  Nancy Conner,et al.  Google Apps: The Missing Manual , 2008 .

[47]  Judith A. Langer,et al.  A Snapshot of Writing Instruction in Middle Schools and High Schools. , 2016 .

[48]  Kerry Rice,et al.  A Comprehensive Look at Distance Education in the K–12 Context , 2006 .

[49]  Larry Cuban,et al.  High Access and Low Use of Technologies in High School Classrooms: Explaining an Apparent Paradox , 2001 .

[50]  Priya Sharma,et al.  A Case Study of Enabling Factors in the Technology Integration Change Process , 2008, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[51]  Thomas A. Brush,et al.  Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research , 2007 .

[52]  Dorothy Williams,et al.  Teachers and ICT: current use and future needs , 2000, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[53]  Sharon E. Smaldino,et al.  Instructional Technology and Media for Learning , 2013 .

[54]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  Teacher Technology Change , 2010 .

[55]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[56]  Yiasemina Karagiorgi * Throwing light into the black box of implementation: ICT in Cyprus elementary schools , 2005 .

[57]  Anca Ioana Andreescu,et al.  Using Cloud Computing in Higher Education: A Strategy to Improve Agility in the Current Financial Crisis , 2011 .

[58]  S. Olesen,et al.  Technology and History , 2013 .

[59]  Dawn Bikowski,et al.  COLLABORATIVE WRITING AMONG SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERS IN ACADEMIC WEB-BASED PROJECTS , 2012 .

[60]  Melvin Kranzberg Technology and History: "Kranzberg's Laws" , 1986 .

[61]  Mona Nasr,et al.  An enhanced e-learning ecosystem based on an integration between cloud computing and Web2.0 , 2010, The 10th IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology.

[62]  Peggy A. Ertmer Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration , 1999 .

[63]  Ana Oskoz,et al.  COLLABORATIVE WRITING: FOSTERING FOREIGN LANGUAGE AND WRITING CONVENTIONS DEVELOPMENT , 2010 .

[64]  Anymir Orellana,et al.  Web 2.0 Technologies for Classroom Instruction: High School Teachers' Perceptions and Adoption Factors , 2011 .

[65]  Rosemary Luckin,et al.  Beyond Web 2.0: mapping the technology landscapes of young learners , 2009, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[66]  Richard J. Noeth,et al.  Evaluating the Effectiveness of Technology in Our Schools. ACT Policy Report. , 2004 .

[67]  Fethi A. Inan,et al.  Does technology integration “work” when key barriers are removed? , 2008 .

[68]  Rob Kling,et al.  What Is Social Informatics and Why Does It Matter? , 2007, D Lib Mag..

[69]  K. Frank,et al.  Factors Affecting Technology Uses in Schools: An Ecological Perspective , 2003 .

[70]  Cher Ping Lim,et al.  Teachers' pedagogical beliefs and their planning and conduct of computer-mediated classroom lessons , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[71]  Ewa McGrail,et al.  The Influence of Classroom Blogging on Elementary Student Writing , 2011 .

[72]  D. Reinking,et al.  Teachers' Perceptions of Integrating Information and Communication Technologies into Literacy Instruction: A National Survey in the United States , 2011 .

[73]  M. Warschauer,et al.  Laptops and Inspired Writing , 2010 .

[74]  Debra Myhill,et al.  More Than Just Error Correction , 2007 .

[75]  T. K. Glennan,et al.  Fostering the Use of Educational Technology: Elements of a National Strategy , 1996 .

[76]  Linda Flower,et al.  Writer-Based Prose: A Cognitive Basis for Problems in Writing. , 1979 .

[77]  P. Y. Thomas,et al.  Cloud computing: A potential paradigm for practising the scholarship of teaching and learning , 2011, Electron. Libr..

[78]  J. H. Sandholtz,et al.  Teachers, Not Technicians: Rethinking Technical Expectations for Teachers , 2004, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[79]  Kimberly A. Patton Teens and Technology , 2011 .