Mathematical Methods in Quantum Molecular Dynamics

The workshop brought together chemists developing mathematical and computational tools for studying the motion of atoms in polyatomic molecules and mathematicians interested in numerical methods for highdimensional problems and semiclassical mechanics. Quantum and semiclassical methods applicable to diatomic molecules are well known and widely used, but the outstanding problem in this field is devising new mathematical and computation tools for studying larger molecules. This is difficult due to the dimensionality of the problem. In principle, molecular dynamics can be understood by solving the time-dependent Schrodinger equation. However, because 3N coordinates are required to specify the configuration of the nuclei in a molecular or reacting system with N atoms, quantum molecular dynamics calculations must deal with very high dimension. This is typically referred to as “the curse of dimensionality.” Effective computational approaches exist for solving differential equations in up to three dimensions, but for a molecule with 6 atoms one must deal with 18 dimensions! Three of the 18 coordinates can be chosen to specify the position of the centre of mass of the system, and are therefore easy to separate. It is common to select coordinates so that three others describe the rotational orientation of the system, and if this is done there are 3N − 6 coordinates describing the shape of the molecule or reacting system. Rotation, however, does not separate because of Coriolis and centrifugal coupling. Although one can easily write down molecular Schrodinger equations, one cannot solve them. So, one resorts to various approximations, primarily to deal with the very high dimensionality of the problem. At the workshop, mathematicians learned what theoretical chemists are doing and what difficulties they must overcome. Chemists learned about rigorous mathematical results obtained recently by mathematicians. This primarily involved theoretical work, but also included ways to deal with high dimensionality when using computers for approximations. In prior conferences and workshops in this subject, there have been significant difficulties getting chemists and mathematicians to talk to one another in a meaningful way. There are differences in nomenclature, and people in the two disciplines often have different aims and priorities. A main goal of this workshop was to facilitate as much interaction between the two groups of individuals as possible, and in this regard, the workshop was very successful.

[1]  Michael Griebel,et al.  A combination technique for the solution of sparse grid problems , 1990, Forschungsberichte, TU Munich.

[2]  S. B. Stechkin Approximation of periodic functions , 1974 .

[3]  Huzihiro Araki,et al.  Reviews in mathematical physics , 1989 .

[4]  I. Mills,et al.  Quantities, Units and Symbols in Physical Chemistry , 1993 .

[5]  Spectrochimica Acta , 1939, Nature.

[6]  Peter Deuflhard,et al.  Numerische Mathematik. I , 2002 .

[7]  Wen Lea Pearn,et al.  (Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics,228(1):274-278)Optimization of the T Policy M/G/1 Queue with Server Breakdowns and General Startup Times , 2009 .

[8]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[9]  J. Murrell,et al.  Molecular Potential Energy Functions , 1985 .

[10]  M. Griebel,et al.  Tensor Product Multiscale Many-Particle Spaces with Finite-Order Weights for the Electronic Schrödinger Equation , 2010 .

[11]  Stefan Teufel,et al.  Adiabatic perturbation theory in quantum dynamics , 2003 .

[12]  C. Lubich From Quantum to Classical Molecular Dynamics: Reduced Models and Numerical Analysis , 2008 .

[13]  V. N. Temli︠a︡kov Approximation of periodic functions , 1993 .

[14]  Journal of Chemical Physics , 1932, Nature.

[15]  Shirley Dex,et al.  JR 旅客販売総合システム(マルス)における運用及び管理について , 1991 .

[16]  Ericka Stricklin-Parker,et al.  Ann , 2005 .

[17]  Third Edition,et al.  Quantities, Units and Symbols in Physical Chemistry , 2009 .