Accuracy of anterior cruciate ligament tunnel placement with an active robotic system: a cadaveric study.

PURPOSE The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of tunnel placement for ACL reconstruction performed with an active robotic system. TYPE OF STUDY Cadaveric analysis. METHODS A reference screw containing 4 fiducials was placed in the femur and tibia of 13 fresh-frozen cadaveric knees. A preoperative plan was developed using images from 3-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions of the knee. The active robotic system then drilled the tunnels. The location and direction of each planned tunnel in the femur and tibia were determined from the preoperative plan. To compare these parameters postoperatively, a mechanical digitizer and a tunnel plug were used. The deviation in location and direction between the planned and drilled tunnel was determined. RESULTS In preliminary trials, the tibial tunnel was located inaccurately because slippage of the drill bit occurred on the bone at the start of tunnel drilling. This was minimized by decreasing the feed rate of the robot by 75%. For the remaining 10 knees, deviations with respect to the preoperative plan were found of 2.0 +/- 1.2 mm and 1.1 degrees +/- 0.7 degrees for the intra- articular tibial tunnel location and direction, respectively. For the femur, the deviations were 1.3 +/- 0.9 mm for the tunnel location (intra-articular) and 1.0 degrees +/- 0.6 degrees for the tunnel direction. CONCLUSIONS The active robotic system is highly accurate for tunnel placement during ACL reconstruction, meaning that the robot drills the tunnels very close to the surgeon's plan. Comparison to a control group of surgeons could not be made because no preoperative plan is usually created in traditional surgery. However, accuracy values in this study were found to be below the values for precision of repeated tunnel placements reported in the literature.

[1]  J. Gillquist,et al.  Graft failure in intra-articular anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a review of the literature. , 1995, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[2]  A Burkart,et al.  Precision of ACL tunnel placement using traditional and robotic techniques. , 2001, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[3]  Niklaus F. Friederich,et al.  Improperly placed anterior cruciate ligament grafts: correlation between radiological parameters and clinical results , 2000, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[4]  A. A. Amis,et al.  Anterior cruciate ligament graft positioning, tensioning and twisting , 1998, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[5]  S A Banks,et al.  Computer Assistance in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  J. Carls,et al.  Drill hole position in endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Results of an advanced arthroscopy course , 1998, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[7]  M. Bernard,et al.  Femoral insertion of the ACL. Radiographic quadrant method. , 1997, The American journal of knee surgery.

[8]  Ejnar Eriksson,et al.  How good are the results of ACL reconstruction? , 1997, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[9]  Philippe Cinquin,et al.  Computer-Assisted Knee Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: First Clinical Tests , 1995 .

[10]  Lutz-Peter Nolte,et al.  Clinical integration of computer-assisted technology for arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction , 2000 .

[11]  J A Feagin,et al.  Topographical anatomy of the intercondylar roof. A pilot study. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  C D Harner,et al.  Evaluation and treatment of recurrent instability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 2000, Instructional course lectures.

[13]  R. Buzzi,et al.  The relationship between the intercondylar roof and the tibial plateau with the knee in extension: relevance for tibial tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 1999, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[14]  Dale M. Daniel,et al.  The effect of tibial attachment site on graft impingement in an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction , 1992, The American journal of sports medicine.

[15]  Michael A. Taylor,et al.  Failure of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament due to impingement by the intercondylar roof. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  L. Gotzen,et al.  Computer-assisted planning and robot-assisted surgery in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction , 2000 .

[17]  C. Morgan,et al.  Definitive landmarks for reproducible tibial tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 1995, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[18]  T. Wickiewicz,et al.  Osteonecrosis of the knee: current clinical concepts , 1998, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[19]  L. Gotzen,et al.  Die computerassistierte Planung und roboterassistierte Ersatzplastik des Vorderen Kreuzbandes mit dem CASPAR-System , 2000 .

[20]  J A de Guise,et al.  Computer assisted knee surgery: diagnostics and planning of knee surgery. , 1997, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[21]  S. Lavallée,et al.  Computer Assisted Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.