The Behavioural Implications of Ubiquitous Monitoring

Ubiquitous environments such as intelligent pervasive spaces are designed to make life better for users. In order to provide much of their intended functionality, significant amounts of data need to be collected about users through sensors deployed ubiquitously. Existing monitoring technologies have been known to often cause undesirable effects, and it is anticipated that ubiquitous monitoring, with its increased coverage, will result in an increase in the occurrence of these effects. So far, a limited amount of research has investigated the impact of this technology on users. As such, we present a preliminary model, consisting of a series of factors related to ubiquitous monitoring believed to influence behaviour, and augmented by the Theory of Planned Behaviour for understanding, predicting and therefore preventing any undesirable effects.

[1]  Kent Larson,et al.  THE PLACELAB : A LIVE-IN LABORATORY FOR PERVASIVE COMPUTING RESEARCH ( VIDEO ) , 2005 .

[2]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  Towards a Discipline for Evaluating Ubiquitous Computing Applications [Technical Report] , 2004 .

[3]  Mihaela Vorvoreanu,et al.  Examining Electronic Surveillance In The Workplace: A Review Of Theoretical Perspectives And Research Findings , 2000 .

[4]  Anders Albrechtslund,et al.  House 2.0: Towards an Ethics for Surveillance in Intelligent Living and Working Environments , 2007 .

[5]  David Zweig,et al.  Beyond Privacy and Fairness Concerns: Examining Psychological Boundary Violations as a Consequence of Electronic Performance Monitoring , 2005 .

[6]  Yves Punie,et al.  A social and technological view of Ambient Intelligence in Everyday Life : What bends the trend ? Key Deliverable The European Media and Technology in Everyday Life Network , 2000-2003 , 2003 .

[7]  George Roussos,et al.  Ubiquitous computing in the real world: lessons learnt from large scale RFID deployments , 2006, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[8]  Kent Larson,et al.  Tools for Studying Behavior and Technology in Natural Settings , 2003, UbiComp.

[9]  Emmanuel Munguia Tapia,et al.  Lessons learned using ubiquitous sensors for data collection in real homes , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[10]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Physical, Social, and Experiential Knowledge in Pervasive Computing Environments , 2007, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[11]  Katrin Jonsson,et al.  The Embedded Panopticon: Visibility Issues of Remote Diagnostics Surveillance , 2006, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[13]  Jeffrey M. Stanton,et al.  Reactions to Employee Performance Monitoring: Framework, Review, and Research Directions , 2000 .

[14]  Marc Langheinrich,et al.  Privacy and trust issues with invisible computers , 2005, CACM.

[15]  Friedemann Mattern,et al.  Living in a smart environment - implications for the coming ubiquitous information society , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37583).

[16]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[17]  Shane Dawson,et al.  Watching Learning From Behind Closed Doors: The Impact of Surveillance on Student Online Behaviour , 2005 .

[18]  Vassilis Kostakos,et al.  The social implications of emerging technologies , 2005, Interact. Comput..

[19]  Elizabeth D. Mynatt,et al.  Potential Intrusiveness of Aware Home Technology: Perceptions of Older Adults , 2004 .