Differential tDCS and tACS Effects on Working Memory-Related Neural Activity and Resting-State Connectivity

Transcranial direct and alternating current stimulation (tDCS and tACS, respectively) entail capability to modulate human brain dynamics and cognition. However, the comparability of these approaches at the level of large-scale functional networks has not been thoroughly investigated. In this study, 44 subjects were randomly assigned to receive sham (N = 15), tDCS (N = 15), or tACS (N = 14). The first electrode (anode in tDCS) was positioned over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, the target area, and the second electrode (cathode in tDCS) was placed over the right supraorbital region. tDCS was delivered with a constant current of 2 mA. tACS was fixed to 2 mA peak-to-peak with 6 Hz frequency. Stimulation was applied concurrently with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) acquisitions, both at rest and during the performance of a verbal working memory (WM) task. After stimulation, subjects repeated the fMRI WM task. Our results indicated that at rest, tDCS increased functional connectivity particularly within the default-mode network (DMN), while tACS decreased it. When comparing both fMRI WM tasks, it was observed that tDCS displayed decreased brain activity post-stimulation as compared to online. Conversely, tACS effects were driven by neural increases online as compared to post-stimulation. Interestingly, both effects primarily occurred within DMN-related areas. Regarding the differences in each fMRI WM task, during the online fMRI WM task, tACS engaged distributed neural resources which did not overlap with the WM-dependent activity pattern, but with some posterior DMN regions. In contrast, during the post-stimulation fMRI WM task, tDCS strengthened prefrontal DMN deactivations, being these activity reductions associated with faster responses. Furthermore, it was observed that tDCS neural responses presented certain consistency across distinct fMRI modalities, while tACS did not. In sum, tDCS and tACS modulate fMRI-derived network dynamics differently. However, both effects seem to focus on DMN regions and the WM network-DMN shift, which are highly affected in aging and disease. Thus, albeit exploratory and needing further replication with larger samples, our results might provide a refined understanding of how the DMN functioning can be externally modulated through commonly used non-invasive brain stimulation techniques, which may be of eventual clinical relevance.

[1]  T. Flaisch,et al.  Electrical Brain Stimulation Improves Cognitive Performance by Modulating Functional Connectivity and Task-Specific Activation , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  M. Nitsche,et al.  The Importance of Timing in Segregated Theta Phase-Coupling for Cognitive Performance , 2012, Current Biology.

[3]  Leigh E. Charvet,et al.  Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence Based Update 2016 , 2016, Brain Stimulation.

[4]  Robert Leech,et al.  Externally induced frontoparietal synchronization modulates network dynamics and enhances working memory performance , 2017, eLife.

[5]  Gregor Thut,et al.  Alpha Power Increase After Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation at Alpha Frequency (α-tACS) Reflects Plastic Changes Rather Than Entrainment , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[6]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Disruption of Large-Scale Brain Systems in Advanced Aging , 2007, Neuron.

[7]  J. Mann,et al.  A Review of the Functional and Anatomical Default Mode Network in Schizophrenia , 2017, Neuroscience Bulletin.

[8]  L. Parra,et al.  Effects of weak transcranial alternating current stimulation on brain activity—a review of known mechanisms from animal studies , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[9]  J. Qiu,et al.  Reduced default mode network functional connectivity in patients with recurrent major depressive disorder , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  D. Schacter,et al.  The Brain's Default Network , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[12]  S. Williams,et al.  Instability of default mode network connectivity in major depression: a two-sample confirmation study , 2017, Translational Psychiatry.

[13]  A. Antal,et al.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[14]  R. Lindenberg,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation in mild cognitive impairment: Behavioral effects and neural mechanisms , 2015, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[15]  Emiliano Santarnecchi,et al.  Age-related differences in default-mode network connectivity in response to intermittent theta-burst stimulation and its relationships with maintained cognition and brain integrity in healthy aging , 2019, NeuroImage.

[16]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans , 2001, Neurology.

[17]  Keith A. Johnson,et al.  Phases of Hyperconnectivity and Hypoconnectivity in the Default Mode and Salience Networks Track with Amyloid and Tau in Clinically Normal Individuals , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  J. Thorne,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex modulates working memory performance: combined behavioural and electrophysiological evidence , 2011, BMC Neuroscience.

[19]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  How to randomise , 1999, BMJ.

[20]  Junghee Lee,et al.  Working memory impairments in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. , 2005, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[21]  A. Lansner,et al.  Neurocognitive Architecture of Working Memory , 2015, Neuron.

[22]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  FSL , 2012, NeuroImage.

[23]  S. Rossi,et al.  Time Course of Corticospinal Excitability and Autonomic Function Interplay during and Following Monopolar tDCS , 2014, Front. Psychiatry.

[24]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Induction of Late LTP-Like Plasticity in the Human Motor Cortex by Repeated Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[25]  D. Antonenko,et al.  Neuronal and behavioral effects of multi-day brain stimulation and memory training , 2018, Neurobiology of Aging.

[26]  O. Jensen,et al.  Cross-frequency coupling between neuronal oscillations , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  Pamela K. Smith,et al.  Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult life span. , 2002, Psychology and aging.

[28]  Ninon Burgos,et al.  New advances in the Clinica software platform for clinical neuroimaging studies , 2019 .

[29]  Felipe Fregni,et al.  Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation and Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation , 2018 .

[30]  B. Cheeran,et al.  Inter-individual Variability in Response to Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Paradigms , 2014, Brain Stimulation.

[31]  N. Wenderoth,et al.  A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools , 2016, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[32]  Denise C. Park,et al.  The adaptive brain: aging and neurocognitive scaffolding. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[33]  F. Fregni,et al.  Noninvasive Brain Stimulation with Low-Intensity Electrical Currents: Putative Mechanisms of Action for Direct and Alternating Current Stimulation , 2010, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[34]  Kathryn M. McMillan,et al.  N‐back working memory paradigm: A meta‐analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[35]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Studying and modifying brain function with non-invasive brain stimulation , 2018, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  P. Brown,et al.  Modulation of Long-Range Connectivity Patterns via Frequency-Specific Stimulation of Human Cortex , 2017, Current Biology.

[37]  S. Rossi,et al.  Adaptability and reproducibility of a memory disruption rTMS protocol in the PharmaCog IMI European project , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[38]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Pharmacological Modulation of Cortical Excitability Shifts Induced by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Humans , 2003, The Journal of physiology.

[40]  Torsten Rohlfing,et al.  Cerebral blood flow in posterior cortical nodes of the default mode network decreases with task engagement but remains higher than in most brain regions. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[41]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Speech Facilitation by Left Inferior Frontal Cortex Stimulation , 2011, Current Biology.

[42]  Norbert Jaušovec,et al.  Increasing working memory capacity with theta transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) , 2014, Biological Psychology.

[43]  P. Uhlhaas,et al.  Working memory and neural oscillations: alpha–gamma versus theta–gamma codes for distinct WM information? , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[44]  A. Brunoni,et al.  A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Over the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Healthy and Neuropsychiatric Samples: Influence of Stimulation Parameters , 2016, Brain Stimulation.

[45]  M. Wischnewski,et al.  NMDA Receptor-Mediated Motor Cortex Plasticity After 20 Hz Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation. , 2018, Cerebral cortex.

[46]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  M. Lövdén,et al.  No Significant Effect of Prefrontal tDCS on Working Memory Performance in Older Adults , 2015, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[48]  Roy H. Hamilton,et al.  Does Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improve Healthy Working Memory?: A Meta-analytic Review , 2016, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[49]  Paul B. Fitzgerald,et al.  Effects of prefrontal bipolar and high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation on cortical reactivity and working memory in healthy adults , 2017, NeuroImage.

[50]  H. Heinze,et al.  Modulation of Working Memory Using Transcranial Electrical Stimulation: A Direct Comparison Between TACS and TDCS , 2018, Front. Neurosci..

[51]  M. Grueschow,et al.  Brain Network Mechanisms Underlying Motor Enhancement by Transcranial Entrainment of Gamma Oscillations , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[52]  Roberta Sellaro,et al.  Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation , 2017 .

[53]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation modulates spontaneous low frequency fluctuations as measured with fMRI , 2016, NeuroImage.

[54]  C. Curtis,et al.  Persistent activity in the prefrontal cortex during working memory , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[55]  Minsoo Kang,et al.  Issues in outcomes research: an overview of randomization techniques for clinical trials. , 2008, Journal of athletic training.

[56]  A. Pahor,et al.  The Effects of Theta and Gamma tACS on Working Memory and Electrophysiology , 2018, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[57]  Michal Lavidor,et al.  Prefrontal oscillatory stimulation modulates access to cognitive control references in retrospective metacognitive commentary , 2014, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[58]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Multilevel linear modelling for FMRI group analysis using Bayesian inference , 2004, NeuroImage.

[59]  Jared Medina,et al.  No evidential value in samples of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) studies of cognition and working memory in healthy populations , 2017, Cortex.

[60]  T. Flaisch,et al.  Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Temporarily Reverses Age-Associated Cognitive Decline and Functional Brain Activity Changes , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[61]  Jesse A. Brown,et al.  The Longitudinal Trajectory of Default Mode Network Connectivity in Healthy Older Adults Varies As a Function of Age and Is Associated with Changes in Episodic Memory and Processing Speed , 2018, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[62]  Tomás Paus,et al.  Inferring causality in brain images: a perturbation approach , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[63]  Manuel Schabus,et al.  Fronto-parietal EEG coherence in theta and upper alpha reflect central executive functions of working memory. , 2005, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[64]  E. Vogel,et al.  Working memory and fluid intelligence: Capacity, attention control, and secondary memory retrieval , 2014, Cognitive Psychology.

[65]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[66]  J. Grafman,et al.  Dorsolateral prefrontal contributions to human working memory , 2013, Cortex.

[67]  Joshua W. Brown,et al.  A meta-analysis of executive components of working memory. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[68]  A. Baddeley Working memory , 2010, Current Biology.

[69]  H. Petsche,et al.  Synchronization between prefrontal and posterior association cortex during human working memory. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[70]  F. Fregni,et al.  Inhibition of motor cortex excitability with 15Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) , 2010, Neuroscience Letters.

[71]  A. Antal,et al.  Transcranial Alternating Current and Random Noise Stimulation: Possible Mechanisms , 2016, Neural plasticity.

[72]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation: a review of the underlying mechanisms and modulation of cognitive processes , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[73]  J. Rothwell,et al.  The role of interneuron networks in driving human motor cortical plasticity. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[74]  Theodore P. Zanto,et al.  Effects of noninvasive brain stimulation on cognitive function in healthy aging and Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2015, Neurobiology of Aging.

[75]  J. Binder,et al.  A Parametric Manipulation of Factors Affecting Task-induced Deactivation in Functional Neuroimaging , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[76]  R. Sperling,et al.  Age-related memory impairment associated with loss of parietal deactivation but preserved hippocampal activation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[77]  N. Wenderoth,et al.  Concurrent tACS-fMRI Reveals Causal Influence of Power Synchronized Neural Activity on Resting State fMRI Connectivity , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[78]  Carly J. Leonard,et al.  The relationship between working memory capacity and broad measures of cognitive ability in healthy adults and people with schizophrenia. , 2013, Neuropsychology.

[79]  Yoshikazu Ugawa,et al.  Adverse events of tDCS and tACS: A review , 2016, Clinical neurophysiology practice.

[80]  M. D’Esposito Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[81]  Simon Hanslmayr,et al.  Modulating Human Memory via Entrainment of Brain Oscillations , 2019, Trends in Neurosciences.

[82]  Joseph M. Orr,et al.  Effects of prefrontal tDCS on executive function: Methodological considerations revealed by meta-analysis , 2018, Neuropsychologia.

[83]  M. Raichle The brain's default mode network. , 2015, Annual review of neuroscience.

[84]  F. Craik,et al.  50 Years of Cognitive Aging Theory. , 2016, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[85]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Sustained Aftereffect of α-tACS Lasts Up to 70 min after Stimulation , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[86]  O. Monchi,et al.  Theta band high definition transcranial alternating current stimulation, but not transcranial direct current stimulation, improves associative memory performance , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[87]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  The Uncertain Outcome of Prefrontal tDCS , 2014, Brain Stimulation.

[88]  F. Fröhlich,et al.  Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Modulates Large-Scale Cortical Network Activity by Network Resonance , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[89]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Modulation of large-scale brain networks by transcranial direct current stimulation evidenced by resting-state functional MRI , 2012, Brain Stimulation.

[90]  D. Purpura,et al.  INTRACELLULAR ACTIVITIES AND EVOKED POTENTIAL CHANGES DURING POLARIZATION OF MOTOR CORTEX. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[91]  Christian Kaufmann,et al.  Default mode network subsystem alterations in obsessive–compulsive disorder , 2014, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[92]  Gang Chen,et al.  Staging Alzheimer’s Disease Risk by Sequencing Brain Function and Structure, Cerebrospinal Fluid, and Cognition Biomarkers , 2016, Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD.

[93]  A. Pahor,et al.  The effects of theta transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on fluid intelligence. , 2014, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[94]  H. Möller,et al.  Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Changes Connectivity of Resting-State Networks during fMRI , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[95]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Deficient Suppression of Default Mode Regions during Working Memory in Individuals with Early Psychosis and at Clinical High-Risk for Psychosis , 2013, Front. Psychiatry.

[96]  John-Stuart Brittain,et al.  Montage Matters: The Influence of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Human Physiological Tremor , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[97]  Carlo Miniussi,et al.  What do you feel if I apply transcranial electric stimulation? Safety, sensations and secondary induced effects , 2015, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[98]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Temporal Autocorrelation in Univariate Linear Modeling of FMRI Data , 2001, NeuroImage.

[99]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[100]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[101]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[102]  Paul B. Fitzgerald,et al.  The effect of γ-tACS on working memory performance in healthy controls , 2015, Brain and Cognition.

[103]  Cleofé Peña-Gómez,et al.  Brain connectivity during resting state and subsequent working memory task predicts behavioural performance , 2012, Cortex.

[104]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Spatial Working Memory in Humans Depends on Theta and High Gamma Synchronization in the Prefrontal Cortex , 2016, Current Biology.

[105]  F. Fregni,et al.  A systematic review on reporting and assessment of adverse effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation. , 2011, The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology.

[106]  Christoph S. Herrmann,et al.  BOLD signal effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) in the alpha range: A concurrent tACS–fMRI study , 2016, NeuroImage.

[107]  Y. Kim,et al.  Time-dependent effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on the enhancement of working memory , 2008, Neuroreport.

[108]  L. Cohen,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008 , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[109]  J. Lisman,et al.  The θ-γ neural code. , 2013, Neuron.

[110]  A. Brunoni,et al.  Working memory improvement with non-invasive brain stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2014, Brain and Cognition.

[111]  T. Yoshiura,et al.  Working memory dysfunction in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a neuropsychological and functional MRI study. , 2009, Journal of psychiatric research.

[112]  V. Moliadze,et al.  No Modulatory Effects when Stimulating the Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus with Continuous 6 Hz tACS and tRNS on Response Inhibition: A Behavioral Study , 2018, Neural plasticity.

[113]  Marc W Howard,et al.  Gamma oscillations correlate with working memory load in humans. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.