Using Problem-Solving Context to Assess Help Quality in Computer-Mediated Peer Tutoring

Collaborative activities, like peer tutoring, can be beneficial for student learning, but only when students are supported in interacting effectively. Constructing intelligent tutors for collaborating students may be an improvement over fixed forms of support that do not adapt to student behaviors. We have developed an intelligent tutor to improve the help that peer tutors give to peer tutees by encouraging them to explain tutee errors and to provide more conceptual help. The intelligent tutor must be able to classify the type of peer tutor utterance (is it next step help, error feedback, both, or neither?) and the quality (does it contain conceptual content?). We use two techniques to improve automated classification of student utterances: incorporating domain context, and incorporating students' self-classifications of their chat actions. The domain context and self-classifications together significantly improve classification of student dialogue over a baseline classifier for help type. Using domain features alone significantly improves classification over baseline for conceptual content.

[1]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  The WEKA data mining software: an update , 2009, SKDD.

[2]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Tutorial Dialogue as Adaptive Collaborative Learning Support , 2007, AIED.

[3]  J. Fantuzzo,et al.  Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on academic achievement and psychological adjustment: A component analysis. , 1989 .

[4]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Providing support for adaptive scripting in an on-line collaborative learning environment , 2006, CHI.

[5]  Joan Gaustad,et al.  Peer and Cross-Age Tutoring , 1993 .

[6]  Rod D. Roscoe,et al.  Understanding Tutor Learning: Knowledge-Building and Knowledge-Telling in Peer Tutors’ Explanations and Questions , 2007 .

[7]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design , 2002 .

[8]  Patrícia C. A. R. Tedesco,et al.  MArCo: Building an Artificial Conflict Mediator to Support Group Planning Interactions , 2003, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[9]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Analyzing collaborative learning processes automatically: Exploiting the advances of computational linguistics in computer-supported collaborative learning , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[10]  N. Webb Peer interaction and learning in small groups , 1989 .

[11]  F. Fischer,et al.  Collaboration Scripts – A Conceptual Analysis , 2006 .

[12]  Antonija Mitrovic,et al.  Supporting collaborative learning and problem-solving in a constraint-based CSCL environment for UML class diagrams , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[13]  Debbie R. Robinson,et al.  Peer and Cross-Age Tutoring in Math:Outcomes and Their Design Implications , 2005 .

[14]  Robert M. Aiken,et al.  Supporting Collaborative Learning With An Intelligent Web-Based System , 2007, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[15]  Y. Lou,et al.  Small Group and Individual Learning with Technology: A Meta-Analysis , 2001 .

[16]  Kathryn B. Laskey,et al.  Introduction to the special issue on the fusion of domain knowledge with data for decision support , 2003 .

[17]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  New challenges in CSCL: towards adaptive script support , 2008, ICLS.

[18]  Joseph E. Beck,et al.  Using Knowledge Tracing in a Noisy Environment to Measure Student Reading Proficiencies , 2006, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[19]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Context Based Classification for Automatic Collaborative Learning Process Analysis , 2007, AIED.