Proving ground for social network analysis in the emerging research area “Internet of Things” (IoT)

This study examines the structural patterns of international co-institutions and co-authors in science citation index papers in the research domain of the Internet of Things (IoT). The study uses measures from the social network analysis method, including degree centrality, betweenness centrality, eigenvector centrality, and effectiveness, to investigate the effects of social networks. In addition, the study proposes a prediction model for assessing the semantic relevancy of research papers in the field of IoT (Regarding social science approach on semantic analysis, refer to Jung and Park in Gov Inf Q, 2015a. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2015.09.010, 32(3):353–358, 2015b). For the analysis, 815 research papers were selected from the Web of Science database for the 1993–2015 period. Empirical analysis results identify China as the most central country, followed by the U.S., Spain, the U.K., and Sweden, in terms of the co-authored network. Similarly, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, and Shanghai Jiao Tong University were ranked first, third, and fourth, respectively, among the top five co-institutions. Northeastern University (U.S.) and the University of Surrey (U.K.) ranked second and fifth, respectively. A confusion matrix was used to validate the accuracy of the proposed model. The accuracy of the prediction model was 76.84 %, whereas recall for the model (ability of a search to find all relevant items in the corpus) was 94.47 %.

[1]  J. Friedman Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. , 2001 .

[2]  Florian Michahelles,et al.  Architecting the Internet of Things , 2011 .

[3]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  A Small World of Citations? The Influence of Collaboration Networks on Citation Practices , 2011, PloS one.

[4]  M. Newman Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[6]  M. Leclerc,et al.  International scientific cooperation: The continentalization of science , 1994, Scientometrics.

[7]  Jeffrey Dean,et al.  Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space , 2013, ICLR.

[8]  Satoru Kawai,et al.  An Algorithm for Drawing General Undirected Graphs , 1989, Inf. Process. Lett..

[9]  Gohar Feroz Khan,et al.  Theories in communication science: a structural analysis using webometrics and social network approach , 2015, Scientometrics.

[10]  Masaki Nakamura,et al.  Sipping Science: The Interpretative Flexibility of Science Cafés in Denmark and Japan , 2015 .

[11]  Kyujin Jung,et al.  A semantic (TRIZ) network analysis of South Korea's "Open Public Data" policy , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[12]  D. Sonnenwald Scientific collaboration , 2007, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[13]  Christina Courtright,et al.  Context in information behavior research , 2007 .

[14]  Felix Wortmann,et al.  Internet of Things , 2015, Business & Information Systems Engineering.

[15]  Han Woo Park,et al.  Decomposing social and semantic networks in emerging "big data" research , 2013, J. Informetrics.

[16]  Yves Gingras,et al.  The globalization of social sciences? Evidence from a quantitative analysis of 30 years of production, collaboration and citations in the social sciences (1980–2009) , 2014 .

[17]  Matthew A. Shapiro,et al.  Regional development in South Korea: accounting for research area in centrality and networks , 2011, Scientometrics.

[18]  Antonio Iera,et al.  The Internet of Things: A survey , 2010, Comput. Networks.

[19]  Tian-Shyug Lee,et al.  Mapping the intellectual structure of the Internet of Things (IoT) field (2000–2014): a co-word analysis , 2015, Scientometrics.

[20]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  Longitudinal trends in networks of university-industry-government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives , 2009, 0912.3100.

[21]  Kevin Ashton,et al.  That ‘Internet of Things’ Thing , 1999 .

[22]  Kyujin Jung,et al.  Tracing interorganizational information networks during emergency response period: A webometric approach to the 2012 Gumi chemical spill in South Korea , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[23]  Sujin Choi,et al.  The triple helix and international collaboration in science , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[24]  Matthew A. Shapiro,et al.  Quantifying the national innovation system: inter-regional collaboration networks in South Korea , 2010, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[25]  Qingfang Wang,et al.  Immigrant underemployment across US metropolitan areas: From a spatial perspective , 2014 .

[26]  魏屹东,et al.  Scientometrics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Big Data.

[27]  Ke Jiang,et al.  A multi-level network analysis of web-citations among the world’s universities , 2013, Scientometrics.

[28]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences , 2002, J. Inf. Sci..

[29]  H. Park,et al.  Diagnosing “Collaborative Culture” Of Biomedical Science in South Korea: Misoriented Knowledge, Competition, and Failing Collaboration , 2015 .

[30]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[31]  Mari Carmen Domingo,et al.  An overview of the Internet of Things for people with disabilities , 2012, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[32]  Chi Harold Liu,et al.  The Emerging Internet of Things Marketplace From an Industrial Perspective: A Survey , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing.

[33]  G. Barnett,et al.  The flow of international students from a macro perspective: a network analysis , 2016 .

[34]  L. Freeman,et al.  Centrality in valued graphs: A measure of betweenness based on network flow , 1991 .

[35]  Yong Lu,et al.  Social Network Analysis of a Criminal Hacker Community , 2010, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Han Woo Park,et al.  How do social scientists use link data from search engines to understand Internet-based political and electoral communication? , 2011, Quality & Quantity.

[37]  R. Hanneman Introduction to Social Network Methods , 2001 .

[38]  Peter Friess,et al.  Internet of Things Strategic Research Roadmap , 2011 .

[39]  Imrich Chlamtac,et al.  Internet of things: Vision, applications and research challenges , 2012, Ad Hoc Networks.

[40]  C. Wagner,et al.  The New Invisible College , 2009 .

[41]  Wu He,et al.  Internet of Things in Industries: A Survey , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[42]  S. Borgatti,et al.  Making Invisible Work Visible: Using Social Network Analysis to Support Strategic Collaboration , 2002 .

[43]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Korean journals in the Science Citation Index: What do they reveal about the intellectual structure of S&T in Korea? , 2008, Scientometrics.

[44]  Ki-Seok KwonHan,et al.  Has globalization strengthened South Korea's national research system? National and international dynamics of the Triple Helix of scientific co-authorship relationships in South Korea , 2012 .

[45]  Y. Gingras,et al.  Cities and the geographical deconcentration of scientific activity: A multilevel analysis of publications (1987–2007) , 2014 .

[46]  Luming Tan,et al.  Future internet: The Internet of Things , 2010, 2010 3rd International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering(ICACTE).

[47]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  International Collaboration in Science: The Global Map and the Network , 2013, ArXiv.

[48]  Marimuthu Palaniswami,et al.  Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions , 2012, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[49]  Gohar Feroz Khan,et al.  International Collaboration within Electronic Government Research Domain , 2011 .

[50]  Lida Xu,et al.  The internet of things: a survey , 2014, Information Systems Frontiers.

[51]  Hildrun Kretschmer,et al.  Connection and stratification in research collaboration: An analysis of the COLLNET network , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..

[52]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Network Structure, Self-Organization and the Growth of International Collaboration in Science.Research Policy, 34(10), 2005, 1608-1618. , 2005, 0911.4299.

[53]  P. Bonacich Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification , 1972 .

[54]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[55]  Anurag Agarwal,et al.  The Internet of Things—A survey of topics and trends , 2014, Information Systems Frontiers.

[56]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[57]  Gohar Feroz Khan,et al.  The e-government research domain: A triple helix network analysis of collaboration at the regional, country, and institutional levels , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..