Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background Conventional endoscopic single-bundle transtibial anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction from the posterolateral tibial footprint to the anteromedial femoral footprint results in a vertical graft. A more oblique horizontal graft from the anteromedial tibial footprint to the posterolateral femoral footprint may offer a better alternative for all endoscopic ACL reconstruction. Hypothesis When compared with a conventional ACL single-bundle position, the horizontal graft ACL position has more obliquity and so undergoes a greater change in length during anterior translation and internal rotation. Study Design Controlled laboratory study. Methods A computer navigation system was used to acquire kinematic data during a flexion-extension cycle and outline the anteromedial and posterolateral aspects of the tibial and femoral footprints on 5 fresh-frozen cadaveric knees. Three virtual graft positions were defined: conventional (posterolateral tibia—anteromedial femur), central, and horizontal (anteromedial tibia— posterolateral femur). After transection of the ACL, the obliquity, anisometry, absolute length change, and apparent strain were computed for each graft position during the Lachman test, the anterior drawer test, and internal rotation at 0° and 30° of flexion. Results The horizontal position was more oblique than the other positions (P < .05). There were no differences in anisometry. The horizontal position elongated more than the other positions during the Lachman test (P < .05) and more than the conventional position during the anterior drawer test (P = .009). During internal rotation at 30° flexion, the horizontal position elongated more than the other positions (P < .05). The central and horizontal positions had more apparent strain than that of the vertical position during the Lachman test and internal rotation (P < .05); no significant difference was found during the anterior drawer test. Conclusion In ACL-deficient cadaveric knees, the horizontal graft position has greater obliquity and so undergoes greater elongation without increased apparent strain when compared to the central graft position, in response to anterior translation and internal rotation maneuvers. Clinical Relevance Horizontal graft placement of a single-bundle ACL may result in greater control of translation and rotation.

[1]  A L Otero,et al.  A comparison of the doubled semitendinosus/gracilis and central third of the patellar tendon autografts in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 1993, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[2]  M. Freeman,et al.  Tibiofemoral Kinematics following Successful Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Dynamic Multiple Resonance Imaging , 2004, The American journal of sports medicine.

[3]  Freddie H Fu,et al.  Double‐Bundle Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: Anatomic and Biomechanical Rationale , 2007, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[4]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  The Position of the Tibia during Graft Fixation Affects Knee Kinematics and Graft Forces for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction * , 2001, The American journal of sports medicine.

[5]  E. Arendt,et al.  Anterior cruciate ligament injuries. , 2001, Current women's health reports.

[6]  Paolo Aglietti,et al.  Patellar Tendon Versus Doubled Semitendinosus and Gracilis Tendons for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 1994, The American journal of sports medicine.

[7]  James R. Robinson,et al.  Morphology of anterior cruciate ligament attachments for anatomic reconstruction: a cadaveric dissection and radiographic study. , 2006, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[8]  B. Beynnon,et al.  The relationship between graft tensioning and the anterior—posterior laxity in the anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed goat knee , 2001, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[9]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison between 11 o'clock and 10 o'clock femoral tunnel placement. 2002 Richard O'Connor Award paper. , 2003, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[10]  Freddie H Fu,et al.  Tunnel Positioning of Anteromedial and Posterolateral Bundles in Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2008, The American journal of sports medicine.

[11]  Andrew D Pearle,et al.  Changes in the Length of Virtual Anterior Cruciate Ligament Fibers during Stability Testing , 2008, The American journal of sports medicine.

[12]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  The Role of the Anteromedial and Posterolateral Bundles of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament in Anterior Tibial Translation and Internal Rotation , 2007, The American journal of sports medicine.

[13]  A. Amis,et al.  The effect of femoral attachment location on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: graft tension patterns and restoration of normal anterior–posterior laxity patterns , 2005, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[14]  C. Schneck,et al.  Testing for isometry during reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Anatomical and biomechanical considerations. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  D. Altchek,et al.  Anterior cruciate ligament revision: double-bundle augmentation of primary vertical graft. , 2006, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[16]  M. S. Hefzy,et al.  Anterior cruciate ligament replacements: A mechanical study of femoral attachment location, flexion angle at tensioning, and initial tension , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[17]  S. Tashman,et al.  Dynamic Function of the ACL-reconstructed Knee during Running , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  Charles H. Brown,et al.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , 1994 .

[19]  Jon K. Sekiya,et al.  Anterior cruciate ligament anatomy and function relating to anatomical reconstruction , 2006, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[20]  Philippe Merloz,et al.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Navigation , 2006, The American journal of sports medicine.

[21]  B. Bach,et al.  An illustrated history of anterior cruciate ligament surgery. , 2010, The journal of knee surgery.

[22]  N. Stergiou,et al.  Effectiveness of Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament with Quadrupled Hamstrings and Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autografts , 2007 .

[23]  Scott Tashman,et al.  Abnormal Rotational Knee Motion during Running after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2004, The American journal of sports medicine.

[24]  T. Wickiewicz,et al.  Reliability of Navigated Knee Stability Examination , 2007, The American journal of sports medicine.

[25]  Darren L. Johnson,et al.  "Vertical grafts": a common reason for functional failure after ACL reconstruction. , 2007, Orthopedics.

[26]  T. Wickiewicz,et al.  Comparison of 3-Dimensional Obliquity and Anisometric Characteristics of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Positions Using Surgical Navigation , 2008, The American journal of sports medicine.

[27]  Claus Fink Jepsen,et al.  Does the position of the femoral tunnel affect the laxity or clinical outcome of the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee? A clinical, prospective, randomized, double-blind study. , 2007, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[28]  Ramprasad Papannagari,et al.  In Vivo Kinematics of the Knee after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2006, The American journal of sports medicine.

[29]  J. Sandelin,et al.  The effect of graft placement on the clinical outcome of the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective study , 2007, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[30]  J. Andrews,et al.  Management of intraoperative complications associated with autogenous patellar tendon graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 2003, Instructional course lectures.

[31]  S. Belkoff,et al.  The effect of oblique femoral tunnel placement on rotational constraint of the knee reconstructed using patellar tendon autografts. , 2004, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[32]  E P Wilkinson,et al.  Comparative tracking error analysis of five different optical tracking systems. , 2000, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[33]  H. Tohyama,et al.  Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction , 2010, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[34]  Andrew A. Amis,et al.  The pivot-shift phenomenon: a clinical and biomechanical perspective , 1998 .

[35]  Yuji Yamamoto,et al.  Knee Stability and Graft Function after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2004, The American journal of sports medicine.