A Mosquito Inspired Strategy to Implant Microprobes into the Brain

Mosquitos are among the deadliest insects on the planet due to their ability to transmit diseases like malaria through their bite. In order to bite, a mosquito must insert a set of micro-sized needles through the skin to reach vascular structures. The mosquito uses a combination of mechanisms including an insertion guide to enable it to bite and feed off of larger animals. Here, we report on a biomimetic strategy inspired by the mosquito insertion guide to enable the implantation of intracortical microelectrodes into the brain. Next generation microelectrode designs leveraging ultra-small dimensions and/or flexible materials offer the promise of increased performance, but present difficulties in reliable implantation. With the biomimetic guide in place, the rate of successful microprobe insertion increased from 37.5% to 100% due to the rise in the critical buckling force of the microprobes by 3.8-fold. The prototype guides presented here provide a reproducible method to augment the insertion of small, flexible devices into the brain. In the future, similar approaches may be considered and applied to the insertion of other difficult to implant medical devices.

[1]  Hamid Charkhkar,et al.  Design and demonstration of an intracortical probe technology with tunable modulus. , 2017, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[2]  R. Bellamkonda,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of silicon microelectrode-induced strain in the brain , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.

[3]  P. Tresco,et al.  Response of brain tissue to chronically implanted neural electrodes , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[4]  Shun-Ho Huang,et al.  In vitro and in vivo characterization of SU-8 flexible neuroprobe: From mechanical properties to electrophysiological recording , 2014 .

[5]  Weileun Fang,et al.  Flexible carbon nanotubes electrode for neural recording. , 2009, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[6]  A. Michael,et al.  Brain Tissue Responses to Neural Implants Impact Signal Sensitivity and Intervention Strategies , 2014, ACS chemical neuroscience.

[7]  J. Schouenborg,et al.  Gelatine-embedded electrodes—a novel biocompatible vehicle allowing implantation of highly flexible microelectrodes , 2010, Journal of neural engineering.

[8]  Jon A. Mukand,et al.  Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia , 2006, Nature.

[9]  Jessica K. Nguyen,et al.  Mechanically-compliant intracortical implants reduce the neuroinflammatory response , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[10]  U. Hofmann,et al.  Microfluidic drive for flexible brain implants , 2017 .

[11]  Dimitra Dodou,et al.  Buckling prevention strategies in nature as inspiration for improving percutaneous instruments: a review , 2016, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[12]  J Miller,et al.  Minocycline increases quality and longevity of chronic neural recordings , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[13]  Garrett B Stanley,et al.  The impact of chronic blood-brain barrier breach on intracortical electrode function. , 2013, Biomaterials.

[14]  Kelsey A. Potter,et al.  Stab injury and device implantation within the brain results in inversely multiphasic neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative responses , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[15]  M K Ramasubramanian,et al.  Mechanics of a mosquito bite with applications to microneedle design , 2007, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[16]  P. Tresco,et al.  The challenge of integrating devices into the central nervous system. , 2011, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[17]  John P. Donoghue,et al.  Bridging the Brain to the World: A Perspective on Neural Interface Systems , 2008, Neuron.

[18]  Francis R. Willett,et al.  Restoration of reaching and grasping in a person with tetraplegia through brain-controlled muscle stimulation: a proof-of-concept demonstration , 2017, The Lancet.

[19]  Huanan Zhang,et al.  Insertion of linear 8.4 μm diameter 16 channel carbon fiber electrode arrays for single unit recordings , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.

[20]  Stuart N. Baker,et al.  Newcastle University Eprints Date Deposited: 23 the Sinusoidal Probe: a New Approach to Improve Electrode Longevity , 2022 .

[21]  Lohitash Karumbaiah,et al.  Intracortical recording interfaces: current challenges to chronic recording function. , 2015, ACS chemical neuroscience.

[22]  Kip A Ludwig,et al.  Using a common average reference to improve cortical neuron recordings from microelectrode arrays. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  Brian J. Kim,et al.  3D Parylene sheath neural probe for chronic recordings , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[24]  Kevin J Otto,et al.  Materials approaches for modulating neural tissue responses to implanted microelectrodes through mechanical and biochemical means. , 2014, Current opinion in solid state & materials science.

[25]  J. Zahn,et al.  Coating flexible probes with an ultra fast degrading polymer to aid in tissue insertion , 2015, Biomedical microdevices.

[26]  Javier DeFelipe,et al.  The Evolution of the Brain, the Human Nature of Cortical Circuits, and Intellectual Creativity , 2011, Front. Neuroanat..

[27]  Joseph J Pancrazio,et al.  Neuroprosthetic devices: how far are we from recovering movement in paralyzed patients? , 2009, Expert review of neurotherapeutics.

[28]  Robert C. Wolpert,et al.  A Review of the , 1985 .

[29]  Christopher L. Frewin,et al.  Sterilization of Thiol-ene/Acrylate Based Shape Memory Polymers for Biomedical Applications , 2017 .

[30]  W. Voit,et al.  Characterization of a Thiol-Ene/Acrylate-Based Polymer for Neuroprosthetic Implants , 2017, ACS omega.

[31]  Christoph Weder,et al.  Polymer nanocomposites with nanowhiskers isolated from microcrystalline cellulose. , 2009, Biomacromolecules.

[32]  Nicolas Y. Masse,et al.  Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm , 2012, Nature.

[33]  A. Constantinesco,et al.  Fifty years of brain tissue mechanical testing: from in vitro to in vivo investigations. , 2010, Biorheology.

[34]  Theodore W. Berger,et al.  A flexible parylene probe for in vivo recordings from multiple subregions of the rat hippocampus , 2016, 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[35]  D. Tyler,et al.  Stimuli-Responsive Polymer Nanocomposites Inspired by the Sea Cucumber Dermis , 2008, Science.

[36]  Karl A. Sillay,et al.  The Substitute Brain and the Potential of the Gel Model , 2013, Annals of neurosciences.

[37]  Matthew D. Johnson,et al.  Spatiotemporal pH dynamics following insertion of neural microelectrode arrays , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[38]  X. Jia,et al.  One-Step Optogenetics with Multifunctional Flexible Polymer Fibers , 2017, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  D. Shreiber,et al.  Mechanical properties of dura mater from the rat brain and spinal cord. , 2008, Journal of neurotrauma.

[40]  D. Kipke,et al.  Insertion shuttle with carboxyl terminated self-assembled monolayer coatings for implanting flexible polymer neural probes in the brain , 2009, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[41]  Jens Schouenborg,et al.  Influence of Probe Flexibility and Gelatin Embedding on Neuronal Density and Glial Responses to Brain Implants , 2015, PloS one.

[42]  Karen L. Smith,et al.  Ultrafast resorbing polymers for use as carriers for cortical neural probes. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[43]  Christoph Weder,et al.  Influence of resveratrol release on the tissue response to mechanically adaptive cortical implants. , 2016, Acta biomaterialia.

[44]  Stéphanie P. Lacour,et al.  Flexible and stretchable micro-electrodes for in vitro and in vivo neural interfaces , 2010, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[45]  David A. Friedenberg,et al.  Using an Artificial Neural Bypass to Restore Cortical Control of Rhythmic Movements in a Human with Quadriplegia , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[46]  Robert L. Rennaker,et al.  Smart Polymers for Neural Interfaces , 2013 .

[47]  James P. Harris,et al.  Mechanically adaptive intracortical implants improve the proximity of neuronal cell bodies , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[48]  T. Jason,et al.  Mechanical properties of dura mater from the rat brain and spinal cord. , 2008 .

[49]  M. Fradin Mosquitoes and Mosquito Repellents: A Clinician's Guide , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[50]  Pedro P. Irazoqui,et al.  Magnetically Inserted Neural Electrodes: Tissue Response and Functional Lifetime , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[51]  Kelsey A. Potter,et al.  Curcumin-releasing mechanically adaptive intracortical implants improve the proximal neuronal density and blood-brain barrier stability. , 2014, Acta biomaterialia.

[52]  Christian Bergaud,et al.  A review on mechanical considerations for chronically-implanted neural probes , 2018, Journal of neural engineering.

[53]  Christoph Weder,et al.  Physiologically responsive, mechanically adaptive bio-nanocomposites for biomedical applications. , 2013, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[54]  J. J. Siegel,et al.  Ultraflexible nanoelectronic probes form reliable, glial scar–free neural integration , 2017, Science Advances.

[55]  Srikanth Vasudevan,et al.  Thiol-ene/acrylate substrates for softening intracortical electrodes. , 2014, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[56]  Jeffrey A. Loeb,et al.  A hybrid silicon-parylene neural probe with locally flexible regions , 2014 .

[57]  A flexible mesh to record the brain , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.

[58]  David C. Martin,et al.  Neuronal cell loss accompanies the brain tissue response to chronically implanted silicon microelectrode arrays , 2005, Experimental Neurology.

[59]  James P. Harris,et al.  In vivo deployment of mechanically adaptive nanocomposites for intracortical microelectrodes , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[60]  Christoph Weder,et al.  Progress towards biocompatible intracortical microelectrodes for neural interfacing applications , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.

[61]  Stuart J. Rowan,et al.  Mechanically adaptive nanocomposites for neural interfacing , 2012 .

[62]  Miguel A. L. Nicolelis,et al.  Brain–machine interfaces to restore motor function and probe neural circuits , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[63]  C. W. Wu,et al.  Mosquito proboscis: an elegant biomicroelectromechanical system. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[64]  Tanuj Gulati,et al.  Braided multi-electrode probes: mechanical compliance characteristics and recordings from spinal cords , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[65]  Lee W. Tien,et al.  Film‐Based Implants for Supporting Neuron–Electrode Integrated Interfaces for The Brain , 2014, Advanced functional materials.

[66]  Carl F. Lagenaur,et al.  Elastomeric and soft conducting microwires for implantable neural interfaces. , 2015, Soft matter.

[67]  S. Rowan,et al.  Stimuli-responsive, mechanically-adaptive polymer nanocomposites , 2011 .