Paradoxical low flow and/or low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: implications for diagnosis and treatment

Paradoxical low flow, low gradient, severe aortic stenosis (AS) despite preserved ejection fraction is a recently described clinical entity whereby patients with severe AS on the basis of aortic valve area have a lower than expected gradient in relation to generally accepted values. This mode of presentation of severe AS is relatively frequent (up to 35% of cases) and such patients have a cluster of findings, indicating that they are at a more advanced stage of their disease and have a poorer prognosis if treated medically rather than surgically. Yet, a majority of these patients do not undergo surgery likely due to the fact that the reduced gradient is conducive to an underestimation of the severity of the disease and/or of symptoms. The purpose of this article is to review and further analyse the distinguishing characteristics of this entity and to present its implications with regards to currently accepted guidelines for AS severity.

[1]  B. Carabello,et al.  Aortic stenosis , 2018, Rapid Cardiac Care.

[2]  Philippe Pibarot,et al.  Comparison of the hemodynamic performance of percutaneous and surgical bioprostheses for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  G. Cioffi,et al.  Low-flow aortic stenosis in asymptomatic patients: valvular-arterial impedance and systolic function from the SEAS Substudy. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[4]  P. Varadarajan,et al.  Survival benefit of aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis with low ejection fraction and low gradient with normal ejection fraction. , 2008, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[5]  N. Jander.  Low-gradient ‘severe’ aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction: new entity, or discrepant definitions? , 2008 .

[6]  Mario J. Garcia,et al.  Influence of concentric left ventricular remodeling on early mortality after aortic valve replacement. , 2008, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[7]  F. Neumann,et al.  Inconsistencies of echocardiographic criteria for the grading of aortic valve stenosis. , 2008, European heart journal.

[8]  Lukas Altwegg,et al.  Percutaneous Transarterial Aortic Valve Replacement in Selected High-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis , 2007, Circulation.

[9]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis Despite Preserved Ejection Fraction Is Associated With Higher Afterload and Reduced Survival , 2007, Circulation.

[10]  J. Serfaty,et al.  Comprehensive evaluation of preoperative patients with aortic valve stenosis: usefulness of cardiac multidetector computed tomography , 2007, Heart.

[11]  M. Enriquez-Sarano,et al.  Aortic Valve Calcification: Determinants and Progression in the Population , 2007, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[12]  S. Little,et al.  Impact of blood pressure on the Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of aortic stenosis , 2006, Heart.

[13]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Value and limitations of peak-to-peak gradient for evaluation of aortic stenosis. , 2006, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[14]  K. O’Brien.  Pathogenesis of calcific aortic valve disease: a disease process comes of age (and a good deal more). , 2006, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[15]  C. Otto,et al.  Valvular aortic stenosis: disease severity and timing of intervention. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch: definition, clinical impact, and prevention , 2005, Heart.

[17]  M. Simon,et al.  Prognostic Importance of Quantitative Exercise Doppler Echocardiography in Asymptomatic Valvular Aortic Stenosis , 2005, Circulation.

[18]  Damien Garcia,et al.  Reduced systemic arterial compliance impacts significantly on left ventricular afterload and function in aortic stenosis: implications for diagnosis and treatment. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  H. Rimington,et al.  Exercise testing to stratify risk in aortic stenosis. , 2005, European heart journal.

[20]  Rosario V. Freeman,et al.  Spectrum of Calcific Aortic Valve Disease: Pathogenesis, Disease Progression, and Treatment Strategies , 2005, Circulation.

[21]  Damien Garcia,et al.  Impact of systemic hypertension on the assessment of aortic stenosis , 2005, Heart.

[22]  H. Baumgartner,et al.  Natriuretic Peptides Predict Symptom-Free Survival and Postoperative Outcome in Severe Aortic Stenosis , 2004, Circulation.

[23]  H. White,et al.  Increased Plasma Natriuretic Peptide Levels Reflect Symptom Onset in Aortic Stenosis , 2003, Circulation.

[24]  Damien Garcia,et al.  Discrepancies between catheter and Doppler estimates of valve effective orifice area can be predicted from the pressure recovery phenomenon: practical implications with regard to quantification of aortic stenosis severity. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  B. Carabello.  Clinical practice. Aortic stenosis. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Assessment of aortic valve stenosis severity: A new index based on the energy loss concept. , 2000, Circulation.

[27]  G Maurer,et al.  "Overestimation" of catheter gradients by Doppler ultrasound in patients with aortic stenosis: a predictable manifestation of pressure recovery. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[28]  K. Chan,et al.  A new, simple and accurate method for determining ejection fraction by Doppler echocardiography. , 1995, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[29]  G. Aurigemma,et al.  Left ventricular hypertrophy and mortality after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. A high risk subgroup identified by preoperative relative wall thickness. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[30]  J. Dumesnil,et al.  Effect of the Geometry of the Left Ventricle on the Calculation of Ejection Fraction , 1982, Circulation.

[31]  N. Reichek,et al.  Severe isolated aortic stenosis with normal left ventricular systolic function and low transvalvular gradients: pathophysiologic and prognostic insights. , 2008, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[32]  G. Aurigemma,et al.  Left ventricular hypertrophy and mortality after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. A high risk subgroup identified by preoperative relative wall thickness. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.