The effects of kin and familiarity on interactions between fish

Fish have been shown to discriminate between individuals on very general bases such as species, body length and colour. More recently, evidence has been accumulating from a number of species that relatedness and familiarity may be extremely important in mediating a range of interactions between individual fish. Studies have shown that fish are able to recognize kin and/or familiars, and that this ability potentially conveys significant benefits, including increased inclusive fitness, reduced inbreeding costs, reduced competition and enhanced antipredator behaviour. Here, we review the literature and consider future directions and applications for this research.

[1]  J. Armstrong,et al.  The benefits of genetic diversity outweigh those of kin association in a territorial animal , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  S. Griffiths.  Preferences for familiar fish do not vary with predation risk in the European minnow , 1997 .

[3]  W. Potts,et al.  The Evolution of Mating Preferences and Major Histocompatibility Complex Genes , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[4]  S. Winberg,et al.  Learning and sibling odor preference in juvenile arctic char,Salvelinus alpinus (L.) , 1996, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[5]  J. Krause,et al.  Cross–species familiarity in shoaling fishes , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  K. Olsén.  Chemoattraction of juvenile Arctic charr [Salvelinus alpinus (L.)] to water scented by conspecific intestinal content and urine , 1987 .

[7]  M. Milinski.  TIT FOR TAT in sticklebacks and the evolution of cooperation , 1987, Nature.

[8]  A. Grafen.  Do animals really recognize kin? , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  L. Dill,et al.  An energy-based model of optimal feeding-territory size. , 1978, Theoretical population biology.

[10]  I. Barber,et al.  How strong are familiarity preferences in shoaling fish? , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  Joseph A. Brown,et al.  Kin discrimination in salmonids , 1996, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[12]  A. Magurran,et al.  Familiarity breeds contempt in guppies , 1999, Nature.

[13]  J. Dodson,et al.  An analysis of the distribution of juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in nature as a function of relatedness using microsatellites , 1999 .

[14]  E. Petersson,et al.  The importance of being familiar: individual recognition and social behavior in sea trout (Salmo trutta) , 1998 .

[15]  Anne E. Magurran,et al.  Familiarity in schooling fish: how long does it take to acquire? , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  A. Magurran,et al.  Schooling decisions in guppies (Poecilia reticulata) are based on familiarity rather than kin recognition by phenotype matching , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[17]  D. Madison,et al.  Time dependency and kin recognition of cannibalistic behavior among poeciliid fishes , 1982 .

[18]  J. Godin,et al.  Association patterns and shoal fidelity in the three–spined stickleback , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  T. C. Marshall,et al.  Statistical confidence for likelihood‐based paternity inference in natural populations , 1998, Molecular ecology.

[20]  P. Sherman,et al.  The Ontogeny of Kin Recognition in Two Species of Ground Squirrels1 , 1982 .

[21]  Kevin N. Laland,et al.  Familiarity facilitates social learning of foraging behaviour in the guppy , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  R. J. Smith,et al.  A re‐evaluation of the effect of shoalmate familiarity on the proliferation of alarm substance cells in ostariophysan fishes , 1998 .

[23]  J. Armstrong,et al.  Growth rates of wild stream‐dwelling Atlantic salmon correlate with activity and sex but not dominance , 2002 .

[24]  D. Chivers,et al.  Chemical alarm signalling in aquatic predator-prey systems: A review and prospectus , 1998 .

[25]  Tagging along: association among individual Pacific herring (Clupea pallasi) revealed by tagging , 2002 .

[26]  A. Magurran,et al.  Sex and schooling behaviour in the Trinidadian guppy , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  K. Olsén.  Sibling recognition in juvenile Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus (L.) , 1989 .

[28]  A. Blaustein,et al.  Kin Recognition in Tadpoles , 1986 .

[29]  T. Quinn,et al.  Chemosensory recognition of siblings in juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) , 1985, Animal Behaviour.

[30]  J. Avise,et al.  EVALUATING KINSHIP OF NEWLY SETTLED JUVENILES WITHIN SOCIAL GROUPS OF THE CORAL REEF FISH ANTHIAS SQUAMIPINNIS , 1986, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[31]  Agnese,et al.  Kin cohesiveness and possible inbreeding in the mouthbrooding tilapia Sarotherodon melanotheron (Pisces Cichlidae) , 1999 .

[32]  A. Meyer,et al.  Kin-structured subpopulations in Eurasian perch (Perca fluviatilis L.) , 2001, Heredity.

[33]  G. Helfman,et al.  Safety in numbers: shoal size choice by minnows under predatory threat , 1991, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[34]  Lee Alan Dugatkin,et al.  Guppies and the TIT FOR TAT strategy: preference based on past interaction , 1991, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[35]  Culum Brown.  Do female rainbowfish (Melanotaenia spp.) prefer to shoal with familiar individuals under predation pressure? , 2002, Journal of Ethology.

[36]  D. Penn.  The scent of genetic compatibility: Sexual selection and the major histocompatibility complex , 2002 .

[37]  A. Magurran,et al.  Schooling preferences for familiar fish vary with group size in a wild guppy population , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  N. van Havre,et al.  Shoaling and kin recognition in the threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.) , 1988 .

[39]  P. Colgan,et al.  Individual and species recognition in centrarchid fishes: evidence and hypotheses , 1986, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[40]  Joseph A. Brown,et al.  Do rainbow trout and Atlantic salmon discriminate kin , 1992 .

[41]  R. J. Post,et al.  Sibling competition and the advantage of mixed families , 1986 .

[42]  A. Magurran,et al.  Schooling preferences for familiar fish in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata , 1994 .

[43]  Kathryn E. Arnold.  Kin recognition in rainbowfish (Melanotaenia eachamensis): sex, sibs and shoaling , 2000, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[44]  T. Quinn,et al.  Sibling recognition and olfactory sensitivity in juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) , 1986 .

[45]  M. Taborsky.  Broodcare helpers in the cichlid fish Lamprologus brichardi: Their costs and benefits , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[46]  G. Ruxton,et al.  The importance of stable schooling: do familiar sticklebacks stick together? , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[47]  Bruce Waldman.  Mechanisms of kin recognition , 1987 .

[48]  T. Dowling,et al.  Absence of population subdivision in the common shiner, Notropis cornutus (Cyprinidae) , 1986, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[49]  A. Laurila,et al.  Early familiarity has fitness consequences for arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus) juveniles , 2001 .

[50]  Manfred Milinski,et al.  Tit for Tat: sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) ‘trusting’ a cooperating partner , 1990 .

[51]  R. J. Smith,et al.  Fathead minnows use chemical cues to discriminate natural shoalmates from unfamiliar conspecifics , 1994, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[52]  G D Ruxton,et al.  Fish shoal composition: mechanisms and constraints , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[53]  G. Helfman.  School fidelity in fishes: The yellow perch pattern , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[54]  N. Metcalfe,et al.  Familiarity influences body darkening in territorial disputes between juvenile salmon , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[55]  S. Winberg,et al.  The influence of rearing conditions on the sibling odour preference of juvenile arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus L. , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[56]  M. Grahn,et al.  Influence of MHC on Sibling Discrimination in Arctic Char, Salvelinus alpinus (L.) , 2002, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[57]  K. Warburton,et al.  Species discrimination in guppies: learned responses to visual cues , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[58]  K. Olsén.  Chemo-attraction between juveniles of two sympatric stocks of Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus (L.), and their gene frequency of serum esterases , 1986 .

[59]  A. Klimley,et al.  School fidelity and homing synchronicity of yellowfin tuna, Thunnus albacares , 1999 .

[60]  T. Quinn,et al.  Discrimination of family-specific odours by juvenile coho salmon: roles of learning and odour concentration* , 2001 .

[61]  Paul J. B. Hart,et al.  The effects of familiarity on competitive interactions between threespined sticklebacks , 2000 .

[62]  M. Keenleyside,et al.  Why are larger convict cichlid (Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum) fry sometimes adopted into broods of smaller fry? , 1995, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[63]  T. Caraco,et al.  Genetic relatedness and group size in an aggregation economy , 1993, Evolutionary Ecology.

[64]  G. Roberts.  Competitive altruism: from reciprocity to the handicap principle , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[65]  G. Barlow,et al.  Chemical Recognition of Young by the Midas Cichlid, Cichlasoma citrinellum , 1976 .

[66]  T. Pitcher,et al.  The genetic structure and microdistribution of shoals of Phoxinus phoxinus, the European minnow , 1993 .

[67]  G. J. Fitzgerald,et al.  Kin recognition and choice of shoal mates by threespine sticklebacks , 1992 .

[68]  Genetic population structure in the Lake Tanganyika sardine Limnothrissa miodon , 1998 .

[69]  J. Armstrong,et al.  Individual space use strategies of wild juvenile Atlantic salmon , 1999 .

[70]  L. Kell,et al.  The role of urine in sibling recognition in Atlantic salmon Salmo salar (L.) parr , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[71]  Bruce Waldman.  Kin recognition: Kin recognition in amphibians , 1991 .

[72]  A grid‐net technique for the analysis of fish positions within free‐ranging shoals , 2001 .

[73]  J. Armstrong,et al.  Kin-biased territory overlap and food sharing among Atlantic salmon juveniles , 2002 .

[74]  W. Hamilton.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[75]  D. Noakes,et al.  Social grouping and genetic variation in common shiners, Notropis cornutus (Pisces, Cyprinidae) , 1981, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[76]  M. Milinski,et al.  No sibling odor preference in juvenile three- spined sticklebacks , 1999 .

[77]  R. Jaeger.  Dear Enemy Recognition and the Costs of Aggression between Salamanders , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[78]  N. Peuhkuri,et al.  Do three-spined sticklebacks group with kin? , 1998 .

[79]  D. Chivers,et al.  Familiarity and shoal cohesion in fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas): implications for antipredator behaviour , 1995 .