Fuzzy sets and the organization of literary texts: a conceptualization and two-stage pilot study

– The purpose of this paper is to describe a conceptualization and two‐stage pilot study that explores ways in which fuzzy sets can be used to measure the indexability of literary texts., – Participants provided a subject description for each in a series of literary and nonliterary texts. Each participant was also randomly assigned to one of three tasks: using a visual analog scale to rate the clarity of each text, using a visual analog scale to rate the confidence each participant felt in describing the subject of each text, or sorting the texts from most to least clear without the use of a visual analog scale. Nonparametric statistics and qualitative analysis were used to analyze the data., – Participants and coders used the visual analog scales successfully. The participants perceived literary texts as less clear than nonliterary texts, and expressed less confidence in their subject description of literary texts than in their descriptions of literary texts. The study found preliminary support for the idea that fuzzy sets can provide a useful theoretical basis for examining the indexability of texts., – A measure of the indexability of literary texts could help provide sound theoretical guidance for construction of tools to organize those texts. A structured comparison of literary and nonliterary texts could help to build a theoretical base from which to make practical decisions about whether and how to perform subject analysis on each type of text.

[1]  Clare Beghtol The Classification of Fiction: The Development of a System Based on Theoretical Principles , 1994 .

[2]  Mary Dabney Wilson,et al.  Guidelines on Subject Access to Individual Works of Fiction, Drama, Etc. Second Edition. , 2000 .

[3]  Paul van Schaik,et al.  Using on-line surveys to measure three key constructs of the quality of human-computer interaction in web sites: psychometric properties and implications , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[4]  D. Feeny,et al.  Visual Analog Scales , 2001, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[5]  Stephen Paling Classification, Rhetoric, and the Classificatory Horizon , 2004, Libr. Trends.

[6]  Donald H. Kraft,et al.  Measurement in Information Science , 1994 .

[7]  Hari Prakash,et al.  A study of information needs of Members of the Legislative Assembly in the capital city of India , 2008, Aslib Proc..

[8]  C. Waltz,et al.  Measurement in Nursing and Health Research , 2010 .

[9]  Daniel P. Miranker,et al.  On a model of indexability and its bounds for range queries , 2002, JACM.

[10]  Leo Egghe,et al.  Construction of weak and strong similarity measures for ordered sets of documents using fuzzy set techniques , 2003, Inf. Process. Manag..

[11]  J. V. Bradley Distribution-Free Statistical Tests , 1968 .

[12]  G. Guyatt,et al.  A comparison of Likert and visual analogue scales for measuring change in function. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[13]  S. Bradford "Sources of information on specific subjects" by S.C. Bradford , 1985 .

[14]  A. Gift,et al.  Visual Analogue Scales: Measurement of Subjective Phenomena , 1989, Nursing research.

[15]  Howard B. Lee,et al.  Foundations of Behavioral Research , 1973 .

[16]  P. Bijur,et al.  Reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for acute abdominal pain in the ED. , 2002, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[17]  N. Hadjikhani,et al.  Early (M170) activation of face-specific cortex by face-like objects , 2009, Neuroreport.

[18]  Daniel Karlsson,et al.  A system for symptom assessment in advanced palliative home healthcare using digital pens , 2004, Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine.

[19]  E. Minium Statistical reasoning in psychology and education , 1970 .

[20]  C Maxwell,et al.  Sensitivity and accuracy of the visual analogue scale: a psycho-physical classroom experiment. , 1978, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[21]  D. R. Swanson Historical note: information retrieval and the future of an illusion , 1997 .

[22]  M E Cline,et al.  Standardization of the visual analogue scale. , 1992, Nursing research.

[23]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[24]  R. Barthes,et al.  The pleasure of the text , 1973, Positive emotions in early modern literature and culture.

[25]  M. Buckland What is a “document”? , 1997 .

[26]  Donald H. Kraft,et al.  Vocabulary mining for information retrieval: rough sets and fuzzy sets , 2001, Inf. Process. Manag..

[27]  D. Price,et al.  The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain , 1983, Pain.

[28]  Roger Tourangeau,et al.  Evaluating the Effectiveness of Visual Analog Scales , 2006 .

[29]  Timothy H. Monk,et al.  A visual analogue scale technique to measure global vigor and affect , 1989, Psychiatry Research.

[30]  Stephen J. Bensman Bradford's Law and Fuzzy Sets: Statistical Implications for Library Analyses , 2001 .

[31]  T. Harrison The shooting of Dan McGrew , 1988 .

[32]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[33]  G. Kieckhefer,et al.  Measuring Human Responses Using Visual Analogue Scales , 1989, Western journal of nursing research.

[34]  W. J. Conover,et al.  Practical Nonparametric Statistics , 1972 .

[35]  N. Lowe,et al.  A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. , 1990, Research in nursing & health.