Memory Change: An Intimate Measure of Persuasion

ABSTRACT A major goal for advertising is to have an enduring emotional impact on an audience by facilitating their creation of personally relevant understandings of an advertisement. This is achieved through a process of cocreation in which consumers integrate advertising content with their own attitudes, beliefs, and values to produce the meaning of an advertisement. This article proposes an approach to evaluating advertisements that builds on the reconstructive nature of memory, the dominant view of memory today. The reconstructive view of memory holds that the memory for the same event is different each time it is recalled and that the person doing the recalling is unaware of these changes. We present an experimental paradigm that assesses advertising's influence on consumers' own memory of their beliefs. We demonstrate that advertising can unconsciously alter consumers' beliefs as reflected by a change in how consumers recall their earlier reporting of these beliefs following an advertising exposure. That is, advertising that causes consumers to remember differently earlier (preadvertising exposure) reported beliefs and in which the change is in the direction of the advertisement's message is an advertisement that contains information the consumer has unconsciously adopted as their own and therefore is likely to be personally relevant and to have an enduring impact on their emotions.

[1]  L R Squire,et al.  Memory Distortions Develop Over Time: Recollections of the O.J. Simpson Trial Verdict After 15 and 32 Months , 2000, Psychological science.

[2]  J. Maloney Curiosity versus Disbelief in Advertising , 2000, Journal of Advertising Research.

[3]  George R. Goethals,et al.  The Perception of Consistency in Attitudes. , 1973 .

[4]  M. Ross Relation of Implicit Theories to the Construction of Personal Histories , 1989 .

[5]  Stewart Shapiro,et al.  Memory-Based Measures for Assessing Advertising Effects: A Comparison of Explicit and Implicit Memory Effects , 2001 .

[6]  G. Fauconnier,et al.  The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind''s Hidden Complexities. Basic Books , 2002 .

[7]  William R. Swinyard,et al.  Attitude-Behavior Consistency: The Impact of Product Trial versus Advertising: , 1983 .

[8]  K. Braun Postexperience Advertising Effects on Consumer Memory , 1999 .

[9]  D. Schacter Searching For Memory , 1996 .

[10]  C. Koch,et al.  Consciousness and neuroscience. , 1998, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  Joseph E LeDoux The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life , 1996 .

[12]  D. Wegner The Illusion of Conscious Will , 2018, The MIT Press.

[13]  A. Stone,et al.  The Seven Sins of Memory: How the Mind Forgets and Remembers , 2001 .

[14]  Bruce F. Hall A New Model For Measuring Advertising Effectiveness , 2002, Journal of Advertising Research.

[15]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  The Seven Sins of Memory: How the Mind Forgets and Remembers , 2001 .

[16]  Kathy Pezdek,et al.  Event Memory and Autobiographical Memory for the Events of September 11, 2001 , 2003 .

[17]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Changing Minds: The Art and Science of Changing Our Own and Other People's Minds , 2004 .

[18]  B. Libet Mind Time: The Temporal Factor in Consciousness , 2004 .

[19]  Z. Kövecses,et al.  Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling , 2000 .

[20]  G. Zaltman How Customers Think: Essential Insights into the Mind of the Market , 2003 .

[21]  J. Chaplin Dictionary of psychology , 1975 .

[22]  Jack M. Feldman,et al.  Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. , 1988 .

[23]  Eric Clark The Want Makers: Inside the World of Advertising , 1990 .

[24]  J. Bettman Memory Factors in Consumer Choice: A Review , 1979 .

[25]  David Ungar,et al.  Self , 2007, HOPL.

[26]  Andrew Ehrenberg,et al.  Brand Advertising As Creative Publicity , 2002, Journal of Advertising Research.

[27]  Edward F. McQuarrie,et al.  Have Laboratory Experiments Become Detached from Advertiser Goals? A Meta-Analysis , 1998 .

[28]  R. Hastie,et al.  Hindsight: Biased judgments of past events after the outcomes are known. , 1990 .

[29]  E. Loftus,et al.  Make my memory: How advertising can change our memories of the past , 2002 .

[30]  U. Neisser John Dean's memory: A case study , 1981, Cognition.

[31]  Gerald M. Edelman,et al.  Wider than the Sky , 2004 .

[32]  W. M. Weilbacher Point of View: Does Advertising Cause a ‘Hierarchy of Effects’? , 2001, Journal of Advertising Research.

[33]  U. Mayr False memories , 2005 .

[34]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. , 1977 .

[35]  Raymond R. Burke,et al.  Competitive Interference and Consumer Memory for Advertising , 1988 .

[36]  John Philip Jones,et al.  When Ads Work: New Proof That Advertising Triggers Sales , 1995 .

[37]  M. Blair Advertising Wearin and Wearout: Ten Years Later--More Empirical Evidence and Successful Practice , 1998 .

[38]  Leonard M. Lodish,et al.  How T.V. Advertising Works: A Meta-Analysis of 389 Real World Split Cable T.V. Advertising Experiments , 1995 .

[39]  E. Tulving,et al.  Associative encoding and retrieval: Weak and strong cues. , 1970 .

[40]  D. S. Lindsay,et al.  Memory impairment and source misattribution in postevent misinformation experiments with short retention intervals , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[41]  Russell I. Haley,et al.  The ARF Copy Research Validity Project , 2000, Journal of Advertising Research.

[42]  S. Pinker The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature , 2002 .

[43]  Margaret Hender Blair,et al.  Convergent findings increase our understanding of how advertising works , 1994 .