Teaching Q Methodology to Baccalaureate Nursing Students

There is a growing professional emphasize on providing patient-centered care, but teaching patient-centered research methods in nursing curricula is far from routine. Q methodology is a philosophical framework and set of techniques used to systematically study subjective attitudes, beliefs, and opinions in a way that minimizes researcher bias. Participants actively make their preferences known through a sorting process; then by-person factor analysis is used to find groups with shared viewpoints. Q methodology can be used for research, quality improvement, and program evaluation; but few nurses have a basic understanding of this mixedmethod design. The purpose of this project is to describe the implementation and evaluation of a oneday class in a baccalaureate nursing research course created to increase students’ awareness of Q methodology. Following a brief overview, students actively engaged in a mock Q study by generating opinion statements, known as a concourse, about their K-12 substance abuse education. Then students performed a Q sort and entered data into a web-based program. After reviewing the steps of data analysis, examples of undergraduate honor student Q methodology studies were shared with the group. Content was reinforced as students applied Q methodological principles and techniques to evaluate the class. The project was classified by the university Institutional Review Board as non-human subjects research. Students provided written responses to four evaluations questions regarding impressions of the class and the method to populate the concourse. The following week, students sorted their level of agreement with 35 subjective statements on a +4 to -4 grid. Anonymous data were analyzed with PQ Method software using centroid factor analysis and varimax rotation. Hensel, D. (2016). Q-methodology: An alternative design for undergraduate nursing honors research. Journal of Nursing Education, 55(11), 659662. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20161011-10 Judge, D., Opsahl, A., & Hensel, D. (2018). Q methodology: Teaching strategy to promote student engagement. Nurse Educator PAP. doi:10.1097/NNE.0000000000000503 Killam, L., Timmermans, K. E., & Raymond, J. M. (2013). The barriers to and benefits of conducting Q-sorts in the classroom. Nurse Researcher, 21(2), 24-29. doi: 10.7748/nr2013.11.21.2.24.e1210 Leach, M. J., Hofmeyer, A. and Bobridge, A. (2016). The impact of research education on student nurse attitude, skill and uptake of evidence-based practice: a descriptive longitudinal survey. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 25: 194–203. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13103 Lobo, V., Fisher, A., Baumann, A., & Akhtar-Danesh, N. (2012). Effective retention strategies for midcareer critical care nurses. Nursing Research, 61, 300-308. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e31825b69b1 Melnyk, B. M., Fineout-Overholt, E., Gallagher-Ford, L., & Kaplan, L. (2012). The state of evidence-based practice in US nurses: Critical implications for nurse leaders and educators. Journal of Nursing Administration, 42(9), 410-417. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e3182664e0a Shorten, A., & Smith, J. (2017). Mixed methods research: Expanding the evidence base. Evidence Based Nursing, 20 (3), 74-75. doi 10.1136/eb-2017-102699 Simons, J. (2013). An introduction to Q methodology. Nurse Researcher, 20(3): 28-32. doi: 10.7748/nr2013.01.20.3.28.c9494 Ramlo, S.E. (2016). Mixed method lessons learned from 80 years of Q methodology. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(1), 28-45. doi:10.1177/1558689815610998 Ramlo, S. E. (2015). Q methodology as a tool for program assessment. MidWestern Educational Researcher, 27(3), 207-223. Tiernon, P., Hensel, D., & Roy-Ehri, L. (2017). Using Q methodology in quality improvement projects. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 46 (4), 601-608. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2017.04.133 Results Thirty-three sorts resulted in a four-factor final solution that explained 45% of the variance: General Confusion (N=6), Seeing Usefulness (N=3), Valuing Practice (N=8), and Ambivalence to Research (N=11). The most favorable attitudes were found among the Seeing Usefulness group who perceived that Q methodology was a good way to do patientcentered research and find opinions. Overall, the interactive format (1, 1, 3, 4) and participating in the step-by-step mock study (0, 2, 4, 2) were positive aspects of the class. Perceiving that the session would have improved with prior knowledge (4, 0, 3, 3) and that there was too much to learn in one session (3, -2, 0, 4) represented areas for improvement. This was the first study to explore outcomes from teaching Q methodology to undergraduate nursing students. The findings reinforce the best teaching and learning practices of exposing students to content prior to class and using active learning strategies. What this study adds to the literature is that teaching undergraduate students about Q methodology can generate interest in alternative approaches for studying subjectivity in nursing practice. More research is needed to understand optimal content exposure. Benefits of Q Methodology for Undergraduate Nursing Research Methods Sample Data Sorting Sheet Conclusions