Proton beam therapy for gliomas: a multicenter prospective registry study from all proton beam facilities in Japan

Abstract We reviewed the outcomes of glioma patients enrolled in a prospective observational registry study of proton beam therapy (PBT) in Japan. The inclusion criteria were glioma patients registered in the Electronic Data Capture system, the Proton-net, between May 2016 and July 2019. Data on patient characteristics, treatments, late adverse events, survival status, recurrence and secondary tumors were extracted and statistically analyzed. The primary endpoint was the overall survival (OS) rate, and the secondary endpoints were the progression-free survival (PFS) rate and cumulative local recurrence rate (cLRR). Of the 65 primary brain tumor patients registered, 29 glioma patients from eight of 19 PBT facilities met the inclusion criteria. There were 19 glioblastoma patients, eight of other malignant gliomas, and two of low-grade gliomas. For glioblastomas, with a median follow-up period of 16 months, the median survival time was 21.2 months and the OS at 1, 2, 3 and 4 years were 77.4%, 44.9%, 23.9% and 23.9%, respectively. The median PFS period was 10.1 months, the 1, 2, 3 and 4-year PFS were 32.4%, 19.4%, 9.7% and 9.7%, respectively. The 1, 2, 3 and 4-year cLRR were 56.1%, 68.8%, 78.4 and 78.4%, respectively. Grade 3 brain necrosis was observed in two patients. No secondary tumor was observed. This is the first report on the current status of PBT for gliomas in Japan. For glioblastomas, the outcomes of PBT are estimated to be equivalent to historical data of photon therapy. The results of a prospective comparative evaluation of PBT and photon therapy are awaited.

[1]  Diane D. Liu,et al.  Phase II trial of proton therapy versus photon IMRT for GBM: secondary analysis comparison of progression-free survival between RANO versus clinical assessment , 2021, Neuro-oncology advances.

[2]  R. Mohan,et al.  Proton Therapy Reduces the Likelihood of High-Grade Radiation-Induced Lymphopenia in Glioblastoma Patients: Phase II Randomized Study of Protons vs. Photons. , 2020, Neuro-oncology.

[3]  Y. Mao,et al.  Particle radiation therapy in the management of malignant glioma: Early experience at the Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center , 2020, Cancer.

[4]  Johannes A Langendijk,et al.  Radiation dose constraints for organs at risk in neuro-oncology; the European Particle Therapy Network consensus. , 2018, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[5]  F. Yamasaki,et al.  JCOG0911 INTEGRA study: a randomized screening phase II trial of interferonβ plus temozolomide in comparison with temozolomide alone for newly diagnosed glioblastoma , 2018, Journal of neuro-oncology.

[6]  A. Lühr,et al.  Relative biological effectiveness in proton beam therapy – Current knowledge and future challenges , 2018, Clinical and translational radiation oncology.

[7]  J. Debus,et al.  Sequential proton boost after standard chemoradiation for high-grade glioma. , 2017, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[8]  M. Irie Brain Tumor Registry of Japan (2005–2008) , 2017, Neurologia medico-chirurgica.

[9]  H. Paganetti,et al.  Proton Treatment Techniques for Posterior Fossa Tumors: Consequences for Linear Energy Transfer and Dose-Volume Parameters for the Brainstem and Organs at Risk. , 2017, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Clinical evidence of variable proton biological effectiveness in pediatric patients treated for ependymoma. , 2016, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[11]  H. Ishikawa,et al.  Proton beam therapy with concurrent chemotherapy for glioblastoma multiforme: comparison of nimustine hydrochloride and temozolomide , 2016, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[12]  H. Shirato,et al.  Evaluation of the relative biological effectiveness of spot-scanning proton irradiation in vitro , 2016, Journal of radiation research.

[13]  H. Paganetti,et al.  Variable Proton Relative Biological Effectiveness: How Do We Move Forward? , 2016, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  Thomas C. Chen,et al.  Maintenance Therapy With Tumor-Treating Fields Plus Temozolomide vs Temozolomide Alone for Glioblastoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2015, JAMA.

[15]  W. Curry,et al.  Proton therapy for low‐grade gliomas: Results from a prospective trial , 2015, Cancer.

[16]  N. Yeh,et al.  The impact of adjuvant radiation therapy for high-grade gliomas by histology in the United States population. , 2014, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  T. Yock,et al.  The Use of Proton Therapy in the Treatment of Benign or Low-Grade Pediatric Brain Tumors , 2014, Cancer journal.

[18]  D. Indelicato,et al.  A treatment planning comparison of highly conformal radiation therapy for pediatric low-grade brainstem gliomas , 2013, Acta oncologica.

[19]  X. Zhu,et al.  Spot scanning proton therapy for craniopharyngioma. , 2012, Practical radiation oncology.

[20]  K. Herfarth,et al.  Comparison of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with intensity modulated particle therapy (IMPT) using fixed beams or an ion gantry for the treatment of patients with skull base meningiomas , 2012, Radiation oncology.

[21]  Anita Mahajan,et al.  Dosimetric comparison of three-dimensional conformal proton radiotherapy, intensity-modulated proton therapy, and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for treatment of pediatric craniopharyngiomas. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  A. Niemierko,et al.  Proton stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of benign meningiomas. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  Se Byeong Lee,et al.  Craniospinal irradiation techniques: a dosimetric comparison of proton beams with standard and advanced photon radiotherapy. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  R. Mirimanoff,et al.  Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. , 2009, The Lancet. Oncology.

[25]  Sairos Safai,et al.  Proton radiotherapy for childhood ependymoma: initial clinical outcomes and dose comparisons. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  Uwe Oelfke,et al.  Proton versus photon radiotherapy for common pediatric brain tumors: Comparison of models of dose characteristics and their relationship to cognitive function , 2008, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[27]  Martin J. van den Bent,et al.  Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  M. Walker,et al.  An analysis of dose-effect relationship in the radiotherapy of malignant gliomas. , 1979, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[29]  E. Alexander,et al.  Evaluation of BCNU and/or radiotherapy in the treatment of anaplastic gliomas. A cooperative clinical trial. , 1978, Journal of neurosurgery.

[30]  E. Gehan,et al.  Evaluation of mithramycin in the treatment of anaplastic gliomas. , 1976, Journal of neurosurgery.

[31]  S. Miyatake,et al.  Long-term survival after treatment of glioblastoma multiforme with hyperfractionated concomitant boost proton beam therapy. , 2015, Practical radiation oncology.

[32]  M. Urie,et al.  Comparative treatment planning: proton vs. x-ray beams against glioblastoma multiforme. , 1992, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[33]  J. Slater,et al.  Role for proton beam irradiation in treatment of pediatric CNS malignancies. , 1992, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[34]  A. Andersen Postoperative irradiation of glioblastomas. Results in a randomized series. , 1978, Acta radiologica: oncology, radiation, physics, biology.