Variability in target volume delineation on CT scans of the breast.

PURPOSE To determine the intra- and interobserver variation in delineation of the target volume of breast tumors on computed tomography (CT) scans in order to perform conformal radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS The clinical target volume (CTV) of the breast was delineated in CT slices by four radiation oncologists on our clinically used delineation system. The palpable glandular breast tissue was marked with a lead wire on 6 patients before CT scanning, whereas 4 patients were scanned without a lead wire. The CTV was drawn by each observer on three separate occasions. Planning target volumes (PTVs) were constructed by expanding the CTV by 7 mm in each direction, except toward the skin. The deviation in the PTV extent from the average extent was quantified in each orthogonal direction for each patient to find a possible directional dependence in the observer variations. In addition, the standard deviation of the intra- and interobserver variation in the PTV volume was quantified. For each patient, the common volumes delineated by all observers and the smallest volume encompassing all PTVs were also calculated. RESULTS The patient-averaged deviations in PTV extent were larger in the posterior (42 mm), cranial (28 mm), and medial (24 mm) directions than in the anterior (6 mm), caudal (15 mm), and lateral (8 mm) directions. The mean intraobserver variation in volume percentage (5.5%, 1 SD) was much smaller than the interobserver variation (17.5%, 1 SD). The average ratio between the common and encompassing volume for the four observers separately was 0.82, 0.74, 0.82, and 0.80. A much lower combined average ratio of 0.43 was found because of the large interobserver variations. For the observer who placed the lead wire, the intraobserver variation in volume was decreased by a factor of 4 on scans made with a lead wire in comparison to scans made without a lead wire. For the other observers, no improvement was seen. Based on these results, an improved delineation protocol was designed. CONCLUSIONS Intra- and especially interobserver variation in the delineation of breast target volume on CT scans can be rather large. A detailed delineation protocol making use of CT scans with lead wires placed on the skin around the palpable breast by the delineating observer reduces the intraobserver variation. To reduce the interobserver variation, better imaging techniques and pathology studies relating glandular breast tissue to imaging may be needed to provide more information on the extent of the clinical target volume.

[1]  S Senan,et al.  Evaluation of a target contouring protocol for 3D conformal radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. , 1999, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  P M Evans,et al.  Practical implementation of compensators in breast radiotherapy. , 1998, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[3]  K Okajima,et al.  Differences in target outline delineation from CT scans of brain tumours using different methods and different observers. , 1999, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[4]  B. Zackrisson,et al.  Optimized MLC-beam arrangements for tangential breast irradiation. , 2000, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[5]  J. Lebesque,et al.  Cardiac and lung complication probabilities after breast cancer irradiation. , 2000, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  Sha X. Chang,et al.  A comparison of different intensity modulation treatment techniques for tangential breast irradiation. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  I. Lax,et al.  Evaluation of irradiated heart volumes in stage I breast cancer patients treated with postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  T. Buchholz,et al.  Dosimetric analysis of intact breast irradiation in off-axis planes. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  M van Herk,et al.  Definition of the prostate in CT and MRI: a multi-observer study. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  Icru Prescribing, recording, and reporting photon beam therapy , 1993 .

[11]  P M Evans,et al.  Evaluation of compensation in breast radiotherapy: a planning study using multiple static fields. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  J. G. Li,et al.  Breast-conserving radiation therapy using combined electron and intensity-modulated radiotherapy technique. , 2000, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[13]  G. Stücklschweiger,et al.  [Evaluation of irradiation techniques in breast carcinoma using dose-volume histograms. Comparison of the heart and lung exposure]. , 1991, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al].

[14]  S. Asplund,et al.  Radiotherapy of breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery: an improved technique using mixed electron-photon beams with a multileaf collimator. , 1998, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[15]  E van der Schueren,et al.  Quality assessment of medical decision making in radiation oncology: variability in target volume delineation for brain tumours. , 1993, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[16]  M. Ciocca,et al.  Clinical target volume localization using conventional methods (anatomy and palpation) and ultrasonography in early breast cancer post-operative external irradiation. , 1997, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[17]  G J Kutcher,et al.  Intensity-modulated tangential beam irradiation of the intact breast. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  L. Marks,et al.  Variability of the location of internal mammary vessels and glandular breast tissue in breast cancer patients undergoing routine CT-based treatment planning. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  C. Fiorino,et al.  Intra- and inter-observer variability in contouring prostate and seminal vesicles: implications for conformal treatment planning. , 1998, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[20]  M. Urie,et al.  Intensity modulation for breast treatment using static multi-leaf collimators. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  P. Roberson,et al.  Dose to lung in primary breast irradiation. , 1983, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  R. Siddon,et al.  Three-dimensional photon dose distributions with and without lung corrections for tangential breast intact treatments. , 1989, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  L. Stitt,et al.  Variability of target volume delineation in cervical esophageal cancer. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.