Quantifying local tumor morphological changes with Jacobian map for prediction of pathologic tumor response to chemo-radiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal cancer

We proposed a framework to detect and quantify local tumor morphological changes due to chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) using a Jacobian map and to extract quantitative radiomic features from the Jacobian map to predict the pathologic tumor response in locally advanced esophageal cancer patients. In 20 patients who underwent CRT, a multi-resolution BSpline deformable registration was performed to register the follow-up (post-CRT) CT to the baseline CT image. The Jacobian map (J) was computed as the determinant of the gradient of the deformation vector field. The Jacobian map measured the ratio of local tumor volume change where J  <  1 indicated tumor shrinkage and J  >  1 denoted expansion. The tumor was manually delineated and corresponding anatomical landmarks were generated on the baseline and follow-up images. Intensity, texture and geometry features were then extracted from the Jacobian map of the tumor to quantify tumor morphological changes. The importance of each Jacobian feature in predicting pathologic tumor response was evaluated by both univariate and multivariate analysis. We constructed a multivariate prediction model by using a support vector machine (SVM) classifier coupled with a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) for feature selection. The SVM-LASSO model was evaluated using ten-times repeated 10-fold cross-validation (10  ×  10-fold CV). After registration, the average target registration error was 4.30  ±  1.09 mm (LR:1.63 mm AP:1.59 mm SI:3.05 mm) indicating registration error was within two voxels and close to 4 mm slice thickness. Visually, the Jacobian map showed smoothly-varying local shrinkage and expansion regions in a tumor. Quantitatively, the average median Jacobian was 0.80  ±  0.10 and 1.05  ±  0.15 for responder and non-responder tumors, respectively. These indicated that on average responder tumors had 20% median volume shrinkage while non-responder tumors had 5% median volume expansion. In univariate analysis, the minimum Jacobian (p  =  0.009, AUC  =  0.98) and median Jacobian (p  =  0.004, AUC  =  0.95) were the most significant predictors. The SVM-LASSO model achieved the highest accuracy when these two features were selected (sensitivity  =  94.4%, specificity  =  91.8%, AUC  =  0.94). Novel features extracted from the Jacobian map quantified local tumor morphological changes using only baseline tumor contour without post-treatment tumor segmentation. The SVM-LASSO model using the median Jacobian and minimum Jacobian achieved high accuracy in predicting pathologic tumor response. The Jacobian map showed great potential for longitudinal evaluation of tumor response.

[1]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[2]  Emily L. Dennis,et al.  Tensor-Based Morphometry Reveals Volumetric Deficits in Moderate=Severe Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury , 2016, Journal of neurotrauma.

[3]  Shan Tan,et al.  Modeling pathologic response of esophageal cancer to chemoradiation therapy using spatial-temporal 18F-FDG PET features, clinical parameters, and demographics. , 2014, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  Mary M. Galloway,et al.  Texture analysis using gray level run lengths , 1974 .

[5]  P. Lambin,et al.  Robust Radiomics Feature Quantification Using Semiautomatic Volumetric Segmentation , 2014, PloS one.

[6]  Xue Hua,et al.  Detecting brain growth patterns in normal children using tensor‐based morphometry , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[7]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A Unified Statistical Approach to Deformation-Based Morphometry , 2001, NeuroImage.

[8]  Nicholas Petrick,et al.  Quantitative imaging to assess tumor response to therapy: common themes of measurement, truth data, and error sources. , 2009, Translational oncology.

[9]  Hyunjin Park,et al.  Quantitative growth measurement of lesions in hepatic interval CT exams , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[10]  Gregory Sharp,et al.  Analytic regularization for landmark-based image registration , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Eric A. Hoffman,et al.  Registration-based estimates of local lung tissue expansion compared to xenon CT measures of specific ventilation , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[12]  D. Altman,et al.  Agreement Between Methods of Measurement with Multiple Observations Per Individual , 2007, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[13]  G Baroni,et al.  Regularization in deformable registration of biomedical images based on divergence and curl operators. , 2014, Methods of information in medicine.

[14]  Kengo Ito,et al.  Evaluation of accuracy of B-spline transformation-based deformable image registration with different parameter settings for thoracic images , 2014, Journal of radiation research.

[15]  Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt,et al.  A Stochastic Quasi-Newton Method for Non-Rigid Image Registration , 2015, MICCAI.

[16]  Wei Lu,et al.  Tracking lung tissue motion and expansion/compression with inverse consistent image registration and spirometry. , 2007, Medical physics.

[17]  T. Watabe,et al.  Evaluation of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Esophageal Cancer: PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors Versus Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  Cristian Lorenz,et al.  4D modeling and estimation of respiratory motion for radiation therapy , 2013 .

[19]  Jean-Philippe Thirion,et al.  Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell's demons , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[20]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[21]  X. Duan,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resectable esophageal cancer: an in-depth study of randomized controlled trials and literature review , 2014, Cancer biology & medicine.

[22]  S. Leung,et al.  Assessing chemotherapy response of squamous cell oesophageal carcinoma with spiral CT. , 1999, The British journal of radiology.

[23]  F. Detterbeck,et al.  Inadequacy of computed tomography in assessing patients with esophageal carcinoma after induction chemoradiotherapy , 1999, Cancer.

[24]  H. Mukaida,et al.  Which is the Optimal Response Criteria for Evaluating Preoperative Treatment in Esophageal Cancer: RECIST or Histology? , 2013, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[25]  J. Petiot,et al.  Pathologic assessment of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy of esophageal carcinoma. Clinicopathologic correlations , 1994, Cancer.

[26]  J. Yu,et al.  Morphometry-based measurements of the structural response to whole-brain radiation , 2015, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[27]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  elastix: A Toolbox for Intensity-Based Medical Image Registration , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[28]  D. Fried,et al.  The emerging field of radiomics in esophageal cancer: current evidence and future potential. , 2016, Translational cancer research.

[29]  Michael L Maitland,et al.  RECIST: no longer the sharpest tool in the oncology clinical trials toolbox---point. , 2012, Cancer research.

[30]  Otto S Hoekstra,et al.  Esophageal cancer: CT, endoscopic US, and FDG PET for assessment of response to neoadjuvant therapy--systematic review. , 2005, Radiology.

[31]  Xiaoou Tang,et al.  Texture information in run-length matrices , 1998, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[32]  D. Sargent,et al.  Comparison of error rates in single-arm versus randomized phase II cancer clinical trials. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[33]  J. Donovan,et al.  A prospective longitudinal study examining the quality of life of patients with esophageal carcinoma , 2000, Cancer.

[34]  E. Rummeny,et al.  Adenocarcinomas of esophagogastric junction: multi-detector row CT to evaluate early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2006, Radiology.

[35]  E. Conant,et al.  Deformable registration for quantifying longitudinal tumor changes during neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[36]  Stefan Klein,et al.  Fast parallel image registration on CPU and GPU for diagnostic classification of Alzheimer's disease , 2013, Front. Neuroinform..

[37]  G. Peters,et al.  Positron emission tomography using 2-deoxy-2-[18F]-fluoro-D-glucose for response monitoring in locally advanced gastroesophageal cancer; a comparison of different analytical methods. , 2003, Molecular imaging and biology : MIB : the official publication of the Academy of Molecular Imaging.

[38]  C. Compton,et al.  The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and the Future of TNM , 2010, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[39]  Patrick Granton,et al.  Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. , 2012, European journal of cancer.

[40]  D. Heron,et al.  The use of strain tensor to estimate thoracic tumors deformation. , 2014, Medical physics.

[41]  Yaoqin Xie,et al.  Image-based modeling of tumor shrinkage in head and neck radiation therapy. , 2010, Medical physics.

[42]  D. Hill,et al.  Medical image registration , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[43]  M. Suntharalingam,et al.  Outcomes After Trimodality Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: The Impact of Histology on Failure Patterns , 2011, American journal of clinical oncology.

[44]  Kai Ding,et al.  4DCT-based measurement of changes in pulmonary function following a course of radiation therapy. , 2010, Medical physics.

[45]  H. Igaki,et al.  Longitudinal assessments of quality of life and late toxicities before and after definitive chemoradiation for esophageal cancer. , 2014, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[46]  Zheng Li,et al.  A New Approach to Evaluate Drug Treatment Response of Ovarian Cancer Patients Based on Deformable Image Registration , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[47]  L. Schwartz,et al.  Variability of lung tumor measurements on repeat computed tomography scans taken within 15 minutes. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[48]  L. Gaspar,et al.  Lung deformations and radiation-induced regional lung collapse in patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy. , 2015, Medical physics.

[49]  Shan Tan,et al.  Spatial-temporal [¹⁸F]FDG-PET features for predicting pathologic response of esophageal cancer to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[50]  Hervé Delingette,et al.  Automatic Detection and Segmentation of Evolving Processes in 3D Medical Images: Application to Multiple Sclerosis , 1999, IPMI.

[51]  Jean-Philippe Thirion,et al.  Deformation Analysis to Detect and Quantify Active Lesions in 3D Medical Image Sequences , 1999, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[52]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  Accuracy and reproducibility of 3D-CT measurements for early response assessment of chemoradiotherapy in patients with oesophageal cancer. , 2011, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.