Development of the Football Game Passing Learning Model

This study aims to develop a passing learning model in the VIII grade junior high school soccer game. This study uses a development model. There are 10 steps in the development procedure including: (1) Potential and Problems (2) data collection (3) product design (4) product validation (5) design revision (6) product testing (7) product revision (8) testing use (9) product revision (10) mass product. This research is only at the product validation stage. The development of the passing model for the soccer game is validated by experts. This research resulted in 5 passing models, namely, the paired passing technique learning model, the passing technique model with the empty space movement of soccer games, the passing technique learning model with a combination of dribbling soccer games, the triangle passing technique learning model moving empty spaces, and the technical learning model. passing with backward and forward movements. The results of the validation obtained a percentage of 75% so that it was categorized as quite feasible and the validation of the soccer experts also got a percentage of 75% which was categorized as quite feasible, so the product draft was said to be quite feasible to become a product with revisions.

[1]  Carlos Lago-Peñas,et al.  Passing Networks and Tactical Action in Football: A Systematic Review , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[2]  Y. Yamazaki,et al.  Degree Distribution of Position-Dependent Ball-Passing Networks in Football Games , 2015, 1504.00208.

[3]  H. Larsson,et al.  What did they learn in school today? A method for exploring aspects of learning in physical education , 2014 .

[4]  D. Penney,et al.  Learning ‘in’, ‘through’ and ‘about’ movement in senior physical education? The new Victorian Certificate of Education Physical Education , 2013 .

[5]  M. O’Sullivan.  New directions, new questions: relationships between curriculum, pedagogy, and assessment in physical education , 2013 .

[6]  Jan Wright,et al.  Health imperatives in primary schools across three countries: intersections of class, culture and subjectivity , 2012 .

[7]  Dawn Penney,et al.  Assessment in Physical Education: A Sociocultural Perspective , 2012 .

[8]  K. Cliff.  A sociocultural perspective as a curriculum change in health and physical education , 2012 .

[9]  Matthew Atencio,et al.  Complexity theory: supporting curriculum and pedagogy developments in Scottish physical education , 2011 .

[10]  New Directions, New Questions: Relationships between Curriculum, Pedagogy and Assessment in Physical Education , 2011 .

[11]  J. Sproule,et al.  Developing pupils’ performance in team invasion games , 2011 .

[12]  Bent Mørken.  Assessment in physical education , 2010 .

[13]  David Kirk,et al.  Situated Learning in Physical Education , 1998 .

[14]  B. Lam.  Constructivist perspectives on learning , 2011 .

[15]  R. Light.  Complex learning theory - its epistemology and its assumptions about learning: implications for physical education. , 2008 .

[16]  David Kirk,et al.  Handbook of Physical Education , 2006 .

[17]  D. Macdonald.  Understanding learning in physical education , 2004 .