A Competition between Relative Stability and Binding Energy in Caffeine Phenyl-Glucose Aggregates: Implications in Biological Mechanisms

Hydrogen bonds and stacking interactions are pivotal in biological mechanisms, although their proper characterisation within a molecular complex remains a difficult task. We used quantum mechanical calculations to characterise the complex between caffeine and phenyl-β-D-glucopyranoside, in which several functional groups of the sugar derivative compete with each other to attract caffeine. Calculations at different levels of theory (M06-2X/6-311++G(d,p) and B3LYP-ED=GD3BJ/def2TZVP) agree to predict several structures similar in stability (relative energy) but with different affinity (binding energy). These computational results were experimentally verified by laser infrared spectroscopy, through which the caffeine·phenyl-β-D-glucopyranoside complex was identified in an isolated environment, produced under supersonic expansion conditions. The experimental observations correlate with the computational results. Caffeine shows intermolecular interaction preferences that combine both hydrogen bonding and stacking interactions. This dual behaviour had already been observed with phenol, and now with phenyl-β-D-glucopyranoside, it is confirmed and maximised. In fact, the size of the complex’s counterparts affects the maximisation of the intermolecular bond strength because of the conformational adaptability given by the stacking interaction. Comparison with the binding of caffeine within the orthosteric site of the A2A adenosine receptor shows that the more strongly bound caffeine·phenyl-β-D-glucopyranoside conformer mimics the interactions occurring within the receptor.

[1]  J. A. Fernández,et al.  Exploration of the theobromine-water dimer: comparison with DNA microhydration. , 2020, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[2]  M. Suhm,et al.  The reduced cohesion of homoconfigurational 1,2-diols. , 2019, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[3]  J. A. Fernández,et al.  Revisiting the spectroscopy of xanthine derivatives: theobromine and theophylline. , 2019, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[4]  J. A. Fernández,et al.  Cigarette and coffee: Exploring caffeine-phenol interactions by the inseparable duet of experimental and theoretical data. , 2019, Chemistry.

[5]  I. Alkorta,et al.  Competing Dispersive Interactions: From Small Energy Differences to Large Structural Effects in Methyl Jasmonate and Zingerone. , 2018, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[6]  J. A. Fernández,et al.  Phenyl-β-D-glucopyranoside and Phenyl-β-D-galactopyranoside Dimers: Small Structural Differences but Very Different Interactions , 2018, Front. Phys..

[7]  E. Segala,et al.  Structures of Human A1 and A2A Adenosine Receptors with Xanthines Reveal Determinants of Selectivity. , 2017, Structure.

[8]  J. A. Fernández,et al.  Sugar-peptidic bond interactions: spectroscopic characterization of a model system. , 2017, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[9]  M. Suhm,et al.  Correcting the record: the dimers and trimers of trans-N-methylacetamide. , 2017, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[10]  H. Lieberman,et al.  A review of caffeine’s effects on cognitive, physical and occupational performance , 2016, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[11]  J. Friedrich,et al.  Understanding Stacking Interactions between an Aromatic Ring and Nucleobases in Aqueous Solution: Experimental and Theoretical Study. , 2016, The Journal of organic chemistry.

[12]  J. A. Fernández,et al.  Modeling the tyrosine-sugar interactions in supersonic expansions: glucopyranose-phenol clusters. , 2016, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[13]  M. Suhm,et al.  A Symmetric Recognition Motif between Vicinal Diols: The Fourfold Grip in Ethylene Glycol Dimer , 2016, Angewandte Chemie.

[14]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Improved Peptide and Protein Torsional Energetics with the OPLS-AA Force Field , 2015, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[15]  Jolanta Natalia Latosińska,et al.  Topology of the Interactions Pattern in Pharmaceutically Relevant Polymorphs of Methylxanthines (Caffeine, Theobromine, and Theophiline): Combined Experimental (1H-14N Nuclear Quadrupole Double Resonance) and Computational (DFT and Hirshfeld-Based) Study , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[16]  J. A. Fernández,et al.  Mimicking anesthetic-receptor interactions in jets: the propofol-isopropanol cluster. , 2014, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[17]  J. Jiménez-Barbero,et al.  Carbohydrate-aromatic interactions. , 2013, Accounts of chemical research.

[18]  M. Himmel,et al.  Caffeine and sugars interact in aqueous solutions: a simulation and NMR study. , 2012, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[19]  Seiji Tsuzuki,et al.  CH/π interactions , 2012 .

[20]  M. Congreve,et al.  Structure of the adenosine A(2A) receptor in complex with ZM241385 and the xanthines XAC and caffeine. , 2011, Structure.

[21]  B. Fredholm,et al.  International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXXI. Nomenclature and Classification of Adenosine Receptors—An Update , 2011, Pharmacological Reviews.

[22]  Ana M Sebastião,et al.  Caffeine and adenosine. , 2010, Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD.

[23]  T. Pyrkov,et al.  The Role of Stacking Interactions in Complexes of Proteins with Adenine and Guanine Fragments of Ligands , 2009, Acta naturae.

[24]  J. Simons,et al.  Carbohydrate–aromatic interactions: A computational and IR spectroscopic investigation of the complex, methyl α-l-fucopyranoside · toluene, isolated in the gas phase , 2009 .

[25]  Hyung Min Kim,et al.  Molecular beam resonant two-photon ionization study of caffeine and its hydrated clusters. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.

[26]  D. Truhlar,et al.  The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 other functionals , 2008 .

[27]  P. Hobza,et al.  Gas-phase spectroscopy of biomolecular building blocks. , 2007, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[28]  Richard A. Friesner,et al.  Integrated Modeling Program, Applied Chemical Theory (IMPACT) , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[29]  Holger Gohlke,et al.  The Amber biomolecular simulation programs , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[30]  T. Halgren Merck molecular force field. I. Basis, form, scope, parameterization, and performance of MMFF94 , 1996, J. Comput. Chem..

[31]  Astrid Nehlig,et al.  Caffeine and the central nervous system: mechanisms of action, biochemical, metabolic and psychostimulant effects , 1992, Brain Research Reviews.

[32]  S H Snyder,et al.  Adenosine receptors and behavioral actions of methylxanthines. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  J. Oomens,et al.  Gas-Phase IR Spectroscopy and Structure of Biological Molecules , 2015 .

[34]  J. Oomens,et al.  IR Spectroscopic Techniques to Study Isolated Biomolecules. , 2015, Topics in current chemistry.

[35]  V. Preedy Caffeine : chemistry, analysis, function and effects , 2012 .