Waste collection systems for recyclables: an environmental and economic assessment for the municipality of Aarhus (Denmark).

Recycling of paper and glass from household waste is an integrated part of waste management in Denmark, however, increased recycling is a legislative target. The questions are: how much more can the recycling rate be increased through improvements of collection schemes when organisational and technical limitations are respected, and what will the environmental and economic consequences be? This was investigated in a case study of a municipal waste management system. Five scenarios with alternative collection systems for recyclables (paper, glass, metal and plastic packaging) were assessed by means of a life cycle assessment and an assessment of the municipality's costs. Kerbside collection would provide the highest recycling rate, 31% compared to 25% in the baseline scenario, but bring schemes with drop-off containers would also be a reasonable solution. Collection of recyclables at recycling centres was not recommendable because the recycling rate would decrease to 20%. In general, the results showed that enhancing recycling and avoiding incineration was recommendable because the environmental performance was improved in several impact categories. The municipal costs for collection and treatment of waste were reduced with increasing recycling, mainly because the high cost for incineration was avoided. However, solutions for mitigation of air pollution caused by increased collection and transport should be sought.

[1]  J H Tanskanen,et al.  Comparison of methods used in the collection of source-separated household waste , 2001, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[2]  Sara Tyskeng,et al.  Energi- och miljömässiga skillnader mellan materialåtervinning och energiutvinning av avfall : en litteratursammanställning , 2007 .

[3]  T. H. Christensen,et al.  Chemical composition of material fractions in Danish household waste. , 2009, Waste management.

[4]  Hanna Kristina Merrild.  Indicators for waste management: How representative is global warming as an indicator for environmental performance of waste management ? , 2009 .

[5]  J. Prins.  Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council , 2006 .

[6]  Yasuhiro Matsui,et al.  Study of the effect of political measures on the citizen participation rate in recycling and on the environmental load reduction. , 2007, Waste management.

[7]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Life-cycle assessment as a decision-support tool—the case of recycling versus incineration of paper , 1998 .

[8]  L Rigamonti,et al.  Life cycle assessment for optimising the level of separated collection in integrated MSW management systems. , 2009, Waste management.

[9]  Anders Lagerkvist,et al.  Comparison of different collection systems for sorted household waste in Sweden. , 2007, Waste management.

[10]  M. Hauschild,et al.  Methodology, tools and case studies in product development , 2000 .

[11]  Stefan Salhofer,et al.  The ecological relevance of transport in waste disposal systems in Western Europe. , 2007, Waste management.

[12]  Janus T Kirkeby,et al.  Evaluation of environmental impacts from municipal solid waste management in the municipality of Aarhus, Denmark (EASEWASTE) , 2006, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[13]  Mary Ann Curran,et al.  The international workshop on electricity data for life cycle inventories , 2005 .

[14]  M. Hauschild,et al.  Life cycle assessment of disposal of residues from municipal solid waste incineration: recycling of bottom ash in road construction or landfilling in Denmark evaluated in the ROAD-RES model. , 2007, Waste management.

[15]  D W Pennington,et al.  Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications , 2004 .

[16]  H. Wenzel,et al.  Paper waste - recycling, incineration or landfilling? A review of existing life cycle assessments. , 2007, Waste management.

[17]  Anders Klang,et al.  Sustainable management of combustible household waste—Expanding the integrated evaluation model , 2008 .

[18]  Anna Björklund,et al.  What life-cycle assessment does and does not do in assessments of waste management. , 2007, Waste management.

[19]  Janus T Kirkeby,et al.  Environmental assessment of solid waste systems and technologies: EASEWASTE , 2006, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[20]  Tomas Ekvall,et al.  System boundaries and input data in consequential life cycle inventory analysis , 2004 .

[21]  Thomas H Christensen,et al.  Diesel consumption in waste collection and transport and its environmental significance , 2009, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[22]  Darren Perrin,et al.  Issues associated with transforming household attitudes and opinions into materials recovery: a review of two kerbside recycling schemes , 2001 .

[23]  Anna Björklund,et al.  Life cycle assessment of fuels for district heating: A comparison of waste incineration, biomass- and natural gas combustion , 2007 .

[24]  Christian Riber,et al.  Environmental assessment of waste incineration in a life-cycle-perspective (EASEWASTE) , 2008, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[25]  B. Weidema.  Market information in life cycle assessment , 2003 .

[26]  Jiri Hyks,et al.  Long-term leaching from MSWI air-pollution-control residues: leaching characterization and modeling. , 2009, Journal of hazardous materials.

[27]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Life cycle assessment of energy from solid waste—part 1: general methodology and results , 2005 .

[28]  Brian Vad Mathiesen,et al.  Uncertainties related to the identification of the marginal energy technology in consequential life cycle assessments , 2009 .