3D Molecular Descriptors Important for Clinical Success
暂无分享,去创建一个
David Kombo | Kartik Tallapragada | Rachit Jain | Joseph Chewning | Anatoly A. Mazurov | Jason D. Speake | Terry A. Hauser | Steve Toler | D. Kombo | Kartik Tallapragada | Rachit Jain | J. Chewning | A. Mazurov | J. Speake | T. Hauser | S. Toler
[1] Peter C. Jurs,et al. Descriptions of molecular shape applied in studies of structure/activity and structure/property relationships , 1987 .
[2] M. Hahn. Receptor surface models. 1. Definition and construction. , 1995, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[3] T. Halgren. MMFF VI. MMFF94s option for energy minimization studies , 1999, J. Comput. Chem..
[4] B. Shoichet,et al. A common mechanism underlying promiscuous inhibitors from virtual and high-throughput screening. , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[5] John D. Storey. A direct approach to false discovery rates , 2002 .
[6] Stephen R. Johnson,et al. Molecular properties that influence the oral bioavailability of drug candidates. , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[7] J. Schmitt,et al. Targeting neuronal nicotinic receptors: a path to new therapies. , 2002, Current drug targets. CNS and neurological disorders.
[8] Brian K Shoichet,et al. Kinase inhibitors: not just for kinases anymore. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[9] Tingjun Hou,et al. ADME Evaluation in Drug Discovery. 4. Prediction of Aqueous Solubility Based on Atom Contribution Approach , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[10] S. R. Breining. Recent developments in the synthesis of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor ligands. , 2004, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.
[11] Stephen K Burley,et al. A Novel Mode of Gleevec Binding Is Revealed by the Structure of Spleen Tyrosine Kinase* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[12] D. Bojanic,et al. Keynote review: in vitro safety pharmacology profiling: an essential tool for successful drug development. , 2005, Drug discovery today.
[13] Charles Kung,et al. Chemical genomic profiling to identify intracellular targets of a multiplex kinase inhibitor. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[14] L. Wodicka,et al. A small molecule–kinase interaction map for clinical kinase inhibitors , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.
[15] B. Shoichet,et al. High-throughput assays for promiscuous inhibitors , 2005, Nature chemical biology.
[16] Brian T. O’Neill,et al. Varenicline: An α4β2 Nicotinic Receptor Partial Agonist for Smoking Cessation , 2005 .
[17] A. Mazurov,et al. 2-(Arylmethyl)-3-substituted quinuclidines as selective α7 nicotinic receptor ligands , 2005 .
[18] John P. Overington,et al. Can we rationally design promiscuous drugs? , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.
[19] Brian K Shoichet,et al. Synergy and antagonism of promiscuous inhibition in multiple-compound mixtures. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[20] A. Mazurov,et al. Selective α7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Ligands , 2006 .
[21] Z. Deng,et al. Bridging chemical and biological space: "target fishing" using 2D and 3D molecular descriptors. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[22] David S. Wishart,et al. DrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..
[23] Sanjivanjit K. Bhal,et al. The Rule of Five revisited: applying log D in place of log P in drug-likeness filters. , 2007, Molecular pharmaceutics.
[24] M. Romanelli,et al. Central Nicotinic Receptors: Structure, Function, Ligands, and Therapeutic Potential , 2007, ChemMedChem.
[25] M. Bencherif,et al. Nicotinic receptors as targets for therapeutic discovery , 2007, Expert opinion on drug discovery.
[26] A. Bender,et al. Modeling Promiscuity Based on in vitro Safety Pharmacology Profiling Data , 2007, ChemMedChem.
[27] Clemencia Pinilla,et al. A Similarity‐based Data‐fusion Approach to the Visual Characterization and Comparison of Compound Databases , 2007, Chemical biology & drug design.
[28] Jean M. Severin,et al. Toxicological evaluation of thiol-reactive compounds identified using a la assay to detect reactive molecules by nuclear magnetic resonance. , 2007, Chemical research in toxicology.
[29] Jeffrey R. Huth,et al. Enhancement of chemical rules for predicting compound reactivity towards protein thiol groups , 2007, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[30] W. S. Caldwell,et al. Synthesis of 2-(pyridin-3-yl)-1-azabicyclo[3.2.2]nonane, 2-(pyridin-3-yl)-1-azabicyclo[2.2.2]octane, and 2-(pyridin-3-yl)-1-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octane, a class of potent nicotinic acetylcholine receptor-ligands. , 2008, The Journal of organic chemistry.
[31] David S. Wishart,et al. DrugBank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..
[32] C. Humblet,et al. Escape from flatland: increasing saturation as an approach to improving clinical success. , 2009, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[33] K. Azzaoui,et al. In vitro safety pharmacology profiling: what else beyond hERG? , 2009, Future medicinal chemistry.
[34] T. Ritchie,et al. The impact of aromatic ring count on compound developability--are too many aromatic rings a liability in drug design? , 2009, Drug discovery today.
[35] J. Peters,et al. Pharmacological Promiscuity: Dependence on Compound Properties and Target Specificity in a Set of Recent Roche Compounds , 2009, ChemMedChem.
[36] Antoine Taly,et al. Nicotinic receptors: allosteric transitions and therapeutic targets in the nervous system , 2009, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[37] L. Price,et al. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and depression: a review of the preclinical and clinical literature , 2010, Psychopharmacology.
[38] Stuart L. Schreiber,et al. Small molecules of different origins have distinct distributions of structural complexity that correlate with protein-binding profiles , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[39] J. Baell,et al. New substructure filters for removal of pan assay interference compounds (PAINS) from screening libraries and for their exclusion in bioassays. , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[40] David DeCaprio,et al. Cheminformatics approaches to analyze diversity in compound screening libraries. , 2010, Current opinion in chemical biology.
[41] David S. Wishart,et al. DrugBank 3.0: a comprehensive resource for ‘Omics’ research on drugs , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..
[42] Stuart L. Schreiber,et al. Quantifying structure and performance diversity for sets of small molecules comprising small-molecule screening collections , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[43] Ajay N. Jain,et al. Chemical structural novelty: on-targets and off-targets. , 2011, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[44] N. Meanwell. Improving drug candidates by design: a focus on physicochemical properties as a means of improving compound disposition and safety. , 2011, Chemical research in toxicology.
[45] D. Kombo,et al. Discovery of 3-(5-chloro-2-furoyl)-3,7-diazabicyclo[3.3.0]octane (TC-6683, AZD1446), a novel highly selective α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist for the treatment of cognitive disorders. , 2012, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[46] Wolfgang Guba,et al. Can we discover pharmacological promiscuity early in the drug discovery process? , 2012, Drug discovery today.
[47] Gary Maurice Dull,et al. Discovery of (2S,3R)-N-[2-(pyridin-3-ylmethyl)-1-azabicyclo[2.2.2]oct-3-yl]benzo[b]furan-2-carboxamide (TC-5619), a selective α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist, for the treatment of cognitive disorders. , 2012, Journal of medicinal chemistry.