Waveform Approach for Assessing Conformity of CISPR 16-1-1 Measuring Receivers

An alternative approach for assessing the conformity of electromagnetic interference measuring receivers with respect to the baseline CISPR 16-1-1 requirements is proposed. The method’s core is based on the generation of digitally synthesized complex waveforms comprising multisine excitation signals and modulated pulses. The superposition of multiple narrowband reference signals populating the standard frequency bands allows for a single-stage evaluation of the receiver’s voltage accuracy and frequency selectivity. Moreover, characterizing the response of the weighting detectors using modulated pulses is more repeatable and less restrictive than the conventional approach. This methodology significantly reduces the amount of time required to complete the verification of the receiver’s baseline magnitudes, because time-domain measurements enable a broadband assessment while the typical calibration methodology follows the time-consuming narrow band frequency sweep scheme. Since the reference signals are generated using arbitrary waveform generators, they can be easily reproduced from a standard numerical vector. For different test receivers, the results of such assessment are presented in the 9 kHz–1 GHz frequency range. Finally, a discussion on the measurement uncertainty of this methodology for assessing measuring receivers is given.

[1]  Victor Iglesias,et al.  Implementation of a Real-Time Spectrum Analyzer on FPGA Platforms , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[2]  Massimo Monti,et al.  Hidden aspects in CISPR 16-1-1 full compliant fast fourier transform EMI receivers , 2016, 2016 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility - EMC EUROPE.

[3]  K. Feser,et al.  Fast Emission Measurement in Time Domain , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[4]  Marc Pous,et al.  A measurement system for radiated transient electromagnetic interference based on general purpose instruments , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC).

[5]  Marc Pous,et al.  Fast and automated verification of multi-channel full time-domain EMI measurement systems , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC).

[6]  Peter Russer,et al.  EMC measurements in the time-domain , 2011, 2011 XXXth URSI General Assembly and Scientific Symposium.

[7]  Rado Lapuh,et al.  Digital oscilloscope calibration using asynchronously sampled signal estimation , 2010, CPEM 2010.

[8]  Robert B. Andrews An Impulse Spectral Intensity Measurement System , 1966 .

[9]  P. Russer,et al.  A Real-Time Time-Domain EMI Measurement System for Full-Compliance Measurements According to CISPR 16-1-1 , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[10]  Peter Russer,et al.  A novel multichannel amplitude probability distribution for a time-domain EMI measurement system according to CISPR 16-1-1 , 2011, 10th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[11]  Mathias Friese,et al.  Multitone signals with low crest factor , 1997, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[12]  Jens Medler,et al.  Use of FFT-based measuring instruments for EMI compliance measurements , 2016, 2016 ESA Workshop on Aerospace EMC (Aerospace EMC).

[13]  S. Cakir,et al.  Improving time-domain EMI measurements through digital signal processing , 2015, IEEE Electromagnetic Compatibility Magazine.

[14]  Paul Jespers,et al.  Calibration of Nanosecond Pulse Generators , 1972 .

[15]  A. Mariscotti On Time- and Frequency-domain equivalence for compliant EMI measurements , 2007, 2007 IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Technology Conference IMTC 2007.