Usability evaluation of attitude control for a robotic wheelchair for tip mitigation in outdoor environments.

Tips and falls are the most prominent causes of wheelchair accidents that occur when driving on uneven terrains and less accessible environments. The Mobility Enhancement Robotic Wheelchair (MEBot) was designed to improve the stability of Electric Powered Wheelchairs (EPW) when driving over these environments. MEBot offers six independently height-adjustable wheels to control attitude of its seat over uneven and angled terrains. Its attitude control application uses an inertial measurement unit to detect seat angles changes to adjust each wheel-height accordingly. MEBot was compared to commercial EPWs in terms of EPW performance (seat angle changes and response time) and participant perception (satisfaction and task-load demand) towards each device. Ten participants drove their own EPW and MEBot for five trials each through driving tasks that replicated outdoor environments. Results showed less change in the pitch angle when driving up and down a 10° slope using MEBot (5.6 ± 1.6°, 6.6 ± 0.5°) compared to the participants' own EPW (14.6 ± 2.6°, 12.1 ± 2.6°). However, MEBot required 7.8 ± 3.0 s to self-adjust to the minimum angle when driving over the tasks. Participants reported no difference in satisfaction and task load demand between EPWs due to similarities in comfort and ease-of-use. Improving the speed and efficiency of MEBot's attitude control application will be addressed in future work based upon participants' feedback.

[1]  Rory A Cooper,et al.  The Voice of the Consumer: A Survey of Veterans and Other Users of Assistive Technology. , 2018, Military medicine.

[2]  Shirley G Fitzgerald,et al.  Tips and falls during electric-powered wheelchair driving: effects of seatbelt use, legrests, and driving speed. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  Ari Voutilainen,et al.  How to ask about patient satisfaction? The visual analogue scale is less vulnerable to confounding factors and ceiling effect than a symmetric Likert scale. , 2016, Journal of advanced nursing.

[4]  Rory A Cooper,et al.  Kinematics and Stability Analysis of a Novel Power Wheelchair When Traversing Architectural Barriers. , 2017, Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

[5]  M. Boninger,et al.  Driving characteristics of electric-powered wheelchair users: how far, fast, and often do people drive? , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  Hongwu Wang,et al.  Design and evaluation of a seat orientation controller during uneven terrain driving. , 2016, Medical engineering & physics.

[7]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Normal walking speed: a descriptive meta-analysis. , 2011, Physiotherapy.

[8]  Robert Riener,et al.  The Cybathlon promotes the development of assistive technology for people with physical disabilities , 2016, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[9]  Rory A Cooper,et al.  A Heuristic Approach to Overcome Architectural Barriers Using a Robotic Wheelchair , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[10]  Yuh Jang,et al.  Wheelchair-related accidents: relationship with wheelchair-using behavior in active community wheelchair users. , 2011, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  R.A. Cooper,et al.  Electric powered wheelchairs , 2005, IEEE Control Systems.

[12]  D. Elbourne,et al.  Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: New concepts are needed to study research participation effects☆ , 2014, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[13]  W. Miller,et al.  The power of power wheelchairs: Mobility choices of community-dwelling, older adults , 2015, Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy.

[14]  Etienne Larissa Duim,et al.  Walking speed of older people and pedestrian crossing time , 2017 .

[15]  Paula W Rushton,et al.  Measurement properties of the Wheelchair Skills Test – Questionnaire for powered wheelchair users* , 2016, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[16]  Rory A Cooper,et al.  Usability Evaluation of a Novel Robotic Power Wheelchair for Indoor and Outdoor Navigation. , 2019, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  Daniel P. J. Bruneau,et al.  A self-analysis of the NASA-TLX workload measure , 2007, Ergonomics.

[18]  Dan Ding,et al.  Usage of tilt-in-space, recline, and elevation seating functions in natural environment of wheelchair users. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[19]  Rory A. Cooper,et al.  Design features that affect the maneuverability of wheelchairs and scooters. , 2010, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[20]  D. Cunningham,et al.  Age-related changes in speed of walking. , 1988 .

[21]  Panagiotis Tsiotras,et al.  Achieving Increased Mobility and Autonomy for Ground Vehicles Over Rough Terrain , 2008 .

[22]  Hongwu Wang,et al.  Participatory design and validation of mobility enhancement robotic wheelchair. , 2015, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[23]  L Demers,et al.  Development of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST). , 1996, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[24]  J. J. Higgins,et al.  Comparison of the power of the paired samples t test to that of Wilcoxon's signed-ranks test under various population shapes. , 1985 .

[25]  Rory A. Cooper,et al.  Development of an advanced mobile base for personal mobility and manipulation appliance generation II robotic wheelchair , 2013, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[26]  Rosemarie Cooper,et al.  RESNA Position on the Application of Tilt, Recline, and Elevating Legrests for Wheelchairs , 2009, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[27]  Shuro Nakajima,et al.  RT-Mover: a rough terrain mobile robot with a simple leg–wheel hybrid mechanism , 2011, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[28]  Louise Demers,et al.  The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0): An overview and recent progress , 2002 .

[29]  H Stephen Kaye,et al.  Demographics and Trends in Wheeled Mobility Equipment Use and Accessibility in the Community , 2010, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[30]  Robert A. Virzi,et al.  Refining the Test Phase of Usability Evaluation: How Many Subjects Is Enough? , 1992 .

[31]  Bogdan T. Fijałkowski Automotive Mechatronics: Operational and Practical Issues , 2011 .

[32]  Gail Powell-Cope,et al.  Wheelchair‐related Falls: Current Evidence and Directions for Improved Quality Care , 2005, Journal of nursing care quality.

[33]  Kara Edwards,et al.  A survey of adult power wheelchair and scooter users , 2010, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[34]  G. A. Smith,et al.  Wheelchair related injuries treated in US emergency departments , 2006, Injury Prevention.

[35]  Siamak Arzanpour,et al.  The dynamics of electric powered wheelchair sideways tips and falls: experimental and computational analysis of impact forces and injury , 2016, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.