Computer Self-Efficacy, Computer Anxiety, and Attitudes toward the Internet: A Study among Undergraduates in Unimas

Eighty-one female and sixty-seven male undergraduates at a Malaysian university, from seven faculties and a Center for Language Studies completed a Computer Self-Efficacy Scale, Computer Anxiety Scale, and an Attitudes toward the Internet Scale and give information about their use of the Internet. This survey research investigated undergraduates’ computer anxiety, computer self-efficacy, and reported use of and attitudes toward the Internet. This study also examined differences in computer anxiety, computer selfefficacy, attitudes toward the Internet and reported use of the Internet for undergraduates with different demographic variables. The findings suggest that the undergraduates had moderate computer anxiousness, medium attitudes toward the Internet, and high computer self-efficacy and used the Internet extensively for educational purposes such as doing research, downloading electronic resources and e-mail communications. This study challenges the long perceived male bias in the computer environment and supports recent studies that have identified greater gender equivalence in interest, use, and skills levels. However, there were differences in undergraduates’ Internet usage levels based on the discipline of study. Furthermore, higher levels of Internet usage did not necessarily translate into better computer self-efficacy among the undergraduates. A more important factor in determining computer self-efficacy could be the discipline of study and undergraduates studying computer related disciplines appeared to have higher self-efficacy towards computers and the Internet. Undergraduates who used the Internet more often may not necessarily feel more comfortable using them. Possibly, other factors such as the types of application used, the purpose for using, and individual satisfaction could also influence computer self-efficacy and computer anxiety. However, although Internet usage levels may not have any impact on computer self-efficacy, higher usage of the Internet does seem to decrease the levels of computer anxiety among the undergraduates. Undergraduates with lower computer anxiousness demonstrated more positive attitudes toward the Internet in this study.

[1]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Electronic Collaborators: Learner-Centered Technologies for Literacy, Apprenticeship, and Discourse , 1998 .

[2]  J. Gackenbach.  Psychology and the Internet : intrapersonal, interpersonal, and transpersonal implications , 1998 .

[3]  Thérèse Bouffard-Bouchard,et al.  Influence of Self-Efficacy on Performance in a Cognitive Task , 1990 .

[4]  N. Sussman,et al.  Sex and power: gender differences in computer-mediated interactions , 2000 .

[5]  G. Hackett.  Role of Mathematics Self-Efficacy in the Choice of Math- Related Majors of College Women and Men: A Path Analysis , 1985 .

[6]  Afzaal H. Seyal,et al.  A Study of Computer Attitudes of Non-Computing Students of Technical Colleges in Brunei Darussalam , 2002, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[7]  Anne Lee Paxton,et al.  The Application of Human Factors to the Needs of the Novice Computer User , 1984, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[8]  A. Durndell,et al.  Gender and computing: A decade of change? , 1997, Comput. Educ..

[9]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Handbook of Research for educational Communications and Technology , 1997 .

[10]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Cultural socialization to computing in college , 1986 .

[11]  Robert A. Reiser.  A history of instructional design and technology: Part I: A history of instructional media , 2001 .

[12]  Joseph B. Giacquinta,et al.  A Survey of Graduate Students as End Users of Computer Technology: New Roles for Faculty , 2000 .

[13]  M. Brosnan,et al.  A cross-cultural comparison of gender differences in computer attitudes and anxieties : the united kingdom and Hong Kong , 1998 .

[14]  S. Owen,et al.  Development and Validation of the Computer Self-Efficacy Scale , 1989 .

[15]  Phyllis Schumacher,et al.  Gender, Internet and computer attitudes and experiences , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[16]  Larry D. Rosen,et al.  The psychological impact of technology from a global perspective , 1995 .

[17]  B. Whitley.  Gender Differences in Computer-Related Attitudes and Behavior: A Meta-Analysis , 1997 .

[18]  Lauren B. Resnick,et al.  Linking schools and work : roles for standards and assessment , 1996 .

[19]  R. Heinssen,et al.  Assessing computer anxiety: Development and validation of the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale , 1987 .

[20]  David C. Morris.  A Survey of Age and Attitudes toward Computers , 1988 .

[21]  John R. Anderson.  Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications , 1980 .

[22]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperation and the Use of Technology , 2007 .

[23]  J. Morahan-Martin.  Males, females, and the Internet. , 1998 .

[24]  I. Miura,et al.  The relationship of computer self-efficacy expectations to computer interest and course enrollment in college , 1987 .

[25]  G. Torkzadeh,et al.  Factorial Validity of a Computer Self-Efficacy Scale and the Impact of Computer Training , 1994 .

[26]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[27]  Kevin Tierney,et al.  The relation of gender and background experience to self-reported computing anxieties and cognitions , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[28]  W. Gardner,et al.  Cognitive, motivation, and affective processes associated with computer-related performance: a path analysis , 2000 .

[29]  T. Busch.  Gender Differences in Self-Efficacy and Attitudes toward Computers , 1995 .

[30]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[31]  Alan Durndell,et al.  Computer self efficacy and gender: a cross cultural study of Scotland and Romania , 2000 .

[32]  Yixin Zhang,et al.  Relationships Among Computer Self-Efficacy, Attitudes Toward Computers, and Desirability of Learning Computing Skills , 1998 .

[33]  Sarah M. Butzin.  Using Instructional Technology in Transformed Learning Environments , 2001 .

[34]  J. Woodrow.  A Comparison of Four Computer Attitude Scales , 1991 .

[35]  D. Drew,et al.  The American Freshman: National Norms for Fall 1971 , 1971 .

[36]  Joseph J. Martocchio,et al.  Microcomputer playfulness: development of a measure with workplace implications , 1992 .

[37]  Brenda H. Loyd,et al.  Gender and Computer Experience as Factors in the Computer Attitudes of Middle School Students , 1987 .

[38]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? , 1998, The American psychologist.

[39]  G. Knezek,et al.  Using a Technology-Enriched Environment to Improve Higher-Order Thinking Skills , 2001 .

[40]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[41]  G. Torkzadeh,et al.  The concept and correlates of computer anxiety , 1992 .

[42]  Angela F. L. Wong,et al.  Computer anxiety and its correlates : a meta-analysis , 1999 .

[43]  Lauren B. Resnick,et al.  Linking School and Work: Roles for Standards and Assessment. First Edition. , 1996 .

[44]  K. Hong.  Relationships between students' and instructional variables with satisfaction and learning from a Web-based course , 2002, Internet High. Educ..

[45]  Andrew S. Chirwa,et al.  Computer Attitude Scale , 1992 .

[46]  Ellen Balka,et al.  Women, Work and Computerization , 2000, IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing.

[47]  A. Bandura,et al.  Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[48]  James C. McElroy,et al.  Computer Anxiety and Computer-Based Training: A Laboratory Experiment , 1990 .

[49]  A. Durndell,et al.  Gender and computing: a decade of change? , 1997 .

[50]  Robin Kay,et al.  Predicting Student Teacher Commitment to the Use of Computers , 1990 .

[51]  Robert A. Reiser.  A history of instructional design and technology: Part II: A history of instructional design , 2001 .

[52]  Robert M. Fano.  Computer-Mediated Communication , 1985, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[53]  Raymond A. Noe,et al.  SELF‐ASSESSED TRAINING NEEDS: THE EFFECTS OF ATTITUDES TOWARD TRAINING, MANAGERIAL LEVEL, AND FUNCTION , 1987 .

[54]  Joanne M. Badagliacco,et al.  Gender and Race Differences in Computing Attitudes and Experience , 1990 .

[55]  M. Kinzie,et al.  Computer technologies: Attitudes and self-efficacy across undergraduate disciplines , 1994 .