Influence of Emotions on the Acceptance of an Oil Drilling Project

In 2014, the Canary Islands were exposed to a decision-making process for an oil drilling project 80 kilometers offshore. Whereas the national government was in favor of oil drilling, the local government was against it because of the environmental impact, and the effect on tourism and the coastal ecosystem. In this study, we analyze the reactions of the local community to this project by connecting beliefs, perceived benefits, perceived risk, procedural justice, negative emotions, and acceptance through a tested structural equation model. The results showed that acceptance was essentially explained by perceived benefits and negative emotions, whereas perceived benefits and procedural justice predicted negative emotions. Several differences between males and females were found. These results are discussed in relation to the importance of understanding the effects and emotional reactions of this type of project on the population before the final decision making.

[1]  Mar Durán,et al.  The role of anticipated emotions in recycling intention: an extension of the Theory of Planned Behaviour / Emociones anticipadas en la intención de reciclar: una extensión de la Teoría de la Conducta Planificada , 2016 .

[2]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Perception of risk: the influence of general trust, and general confidence , 2005 .

[3]  I. Dincer Environmental impacts of energy , 1999 .

[4]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[5]  Edward Sagarin,et al.  Humanistic Psychotherapy: The Rational-Emotive Approach , 1974 .

[6]  G. Georgiou,et al.  Examining the direct and indirect effects of visual-verbal paired associate learning on Chinese word reading. , 2017, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[7]  Beatriz Gandarillas,et al.  Emoción y meta-cognición: implicaciones para el cambio de actitud , 2010 .

[8]  Jeremy Firestone,et al.  The effect of the 2010 Gulf oil spill on public attitudes toward offshore oil drilling and wind development , 2013 .

[9]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Personal Values, Beliefs, and Ecological Risk Perception , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[11]  Thomas M. Parris,et al.  Sustainability Values, Attitudes, and Behaviors: A Review of Multinational and Global Trends , 2006 .

[12]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  EQS : structural equations program manual , 1989 .

[13]  U.S. consumer attitudes and expectations about energy , 2015 .

[14]  Yves Rosseel,et al.  lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling , 2012 .

[15]  E. Kals,et al.  Emotional Affinity toward Nature as a Motivational Basis to Protect Nature , 1999 .

[16]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Find the differences and the similarities: Relating perceived benefits, perceived costs and protected values to acceptance of five energy technologies , 2014 .

[17]  K. Scherer,et al.  Appraisal Theories of Emotion: State of the Art and Future Development , 2013 .

[18]  Dominique Brossard,et al.  Interpersonal Amplification of Risk? Citizen Discussions and Their Impact on Perceptions of Risks and Benefits of a Biological Research Facility , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[19]  Ralph Adolphs,et al.  Neuropsychology: How Many Emotions Are There? , 2015, Current Biology.

[20]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  Melinda J. Milligan Displacement and Identity Discontinuity: The Role of Nostalgia in Establishing New Identity Categories , 2003 .

[22]  Jean-Christophe Gaillard,et al.  Alternative paradigms of volcanic risk perception: The case of Mt Pinatubo in the Philippines , 2008 .

[23]  L. Dominelli Environmental justice at the heart of social work practice: Greening the profession , 2013 .

[24]  L. Sjöberg Risk perception, emotion and policy: the case of nuclear technology , 2003, European Review.

[25]  Dominik Möst,et al.  Carbon Capture and Storage on its way to large-scale deployment: Social acceptance and willingness to pay in Germany , 2012 .

[26]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Enhancing local distinctiveness fosters public acceptance of tidal energy: A UK case study , 2011 .

[27]  W. Kempton,et al.  Public opinion about large offshore wind power: Underlying factors , 2007 .

[28]  E. Thompson Development and Validation of an Internationally Reliable Short-Form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) , 2007 .

[29]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[30]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Social acceptance of low carbon energy and associated infrastructures: A critical discussion , 2013 .

[31]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Fair play in energy policy decisions: Procedural fairness, outcome fairness and acceptance of the decision to rebuild nuclear power plants , 2012 .

[32]  La regulación de las emociones , 2005 .

[33]  Karine J. Lavergne,et al.  The role of perceived government style in the facilitation of self-determined and non self-determined motivation for pro-environmental behavior , 2010 .

[34]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Are risk or benefit perceptions more important for public acceptance of innovative food technologies: A meta-analysis , 2016 .

[35]  D. López‐Carr,et al.  Social identity, perception and motivation in adaptation to climate risk in the coffee sector of Chiapas, Mexico , 2011 .

[36]  Sandra J. Garren,et al.  The role of individual well-being in risk perception and evacuation for chronic vs. acute natural hazards in Mexico , 2011 .

[37]  U. Kreuter,et al.  Examining the direct and indirect effects of environmental change and place attachment on land management decisions in the Hill Country of Texas, USA , 2012 .

[38]  Jaime L. Napier,et al.  Does Moral Conviction Really Override Concerns About Procedural Justice? A Reexamination of the Value Protection Model , 2008 .

[39]  Mónica Alzate,et al.  Emociones y comportamiento pro-ambiental , 2007 .

[40]  M. O. Edino,et al.  Perceptions and attitudes towards gas flaring in the Niger Delta, Nigeria , 2010 .

[41]  G. Evans,et al.  Environment and Behavior , 2001 .

[42]  Paul Upham,et al.  Towards a cross-paradigmatic framework of the social acceptance of energy systems , 2015 .

[43]  A. Omer Energy, environment and sustainable development , 2008 .

[44]  Stacia J. Dreyer,et al.  Are acceptance, support, and the factors that affect them, different? Examining perceptions of U.S. fuel economy standards , 2015 .

[45]  Jacqueline Davis,et al.  Procedural justice and police legitimacy: a systematic review of the research evidence , 2013, Journal of Experimental Criminology.

[46]  L. Sjöberg,et al.  Factors in risk perception. , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[47]  G. Carrus,et al.  Emotions, habits and rational choices in ecological behaviours: The case of recycling and use of public transportation , 2008 .

[48]  D. Subramanian,et al.  How Risk Perceptions Influence Evacuations from Hurricanes and Compliance with Government Directives , 2013 .

[49]  C. K. Mertz,et al.  An Emotion‐Based Model of Risk Perception and Stigma Susceptibility: Cognitive Appraisals of Emotion, Affective Reactivity, Worldviews, and Risk Perceptions in the Generation of Technological Stigma † , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[50]  Timothy F. Smith,et al.  Institutional credibility and leadership: critical challenges for community-based natural resource governance in rural and remote Australia , 2008 .

[51]  R. J. Bord,et al.  Risk Perceptions, General Environmental Beliefs, and Willingness to Address Climate Change , 1999 .

[52]  M. Fried,et al.  CONTINUITIES AND DISCONTINUITIES OF PLACE , 2000 .

[53]  Arjun Chaudhuri,et al.  A study of emotion and reason in products and services , 2002 .

[54]  H. Christensen,et al.  A short form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule: evaluation of factorial validity and invariance across demographic variables in a community sample , 1999 .

[55]  I. Ajzen Nature and operation of attitudes. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[56]  Andreas Ritter,et al.  Structural Equations With Latent Variables , 2016 .

[57]  Eric R. A. N. Smith,et al.  The public’s trust in scientific claims regarding offshore oil drilling , 2010, Public understanding of science.

[58]  Khorshed Alam,et al.  Environmental orientations and environmental behaviour: Perceptions of protected area tourism stakeholders , 2014 .

[59]  B. Hernández,et al.  The Relationship between Social and Environmental Interdependence as an Explanation of Proenvironmental Behavior , 2015 .

[60]  W. Abrahamse,et al.  Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory , 2005 .

[61]  P. Devine‐Wright Reconsidering public attitudes and public acceptance of renewable energy technologies: a critical review , 2007 .

[62]  Anne Beaudry,et al.  Understanding User Responses to Information Technology: A Coping Model of User Adaption , 2005, MIS Q..

[63]  P. Devine‐Wright Rethinking NIMBYism: The role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place‐protective action , 2009 .

[64]  Pilar-Ester Arroyo-López Design of e-waste recycling programmes taking participant motivations into account: An exploratory study in the State of Mexico , 2012 .

[65]  A. Leiserowitz Climate Change Risk Perception and Policy Preferences: The Role of Affect, Imagery, and Values , 2006 .

[66]  P. Jaramillo,et al.  Energy development and Native Americans: Values and beliefs about energy from the Navajo Nation , 2015 .

[67]  B. Wiersma,et al.  Community benefits, framing and the social acceptance of offshore wind farms: An experimental study in England , 2014 .

[68]  David Bidwell,et al.  The role of values in public beliefs and attitudes towards commercial wind energy , 2013 .

[69]  B. Hernández,et al.  Emotions and coping strategies during an episode of volcanic activity and their relations to place attachment , 2014 .

[70]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Salient Value Similarity, Social Trust, and Risk/Benefit Perception , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[71]  김재영 Siting Hazardous Waste Treatment Facilities : The NIMBY Syndrome , 1992 .

[72]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale , 2000 .

[73]  M. Seligman,et al.  The Optimistic Child , 1995 .

[74]  Mohammad Arshad Rahman,et al.  To drill or not to drill? An econometric analysis of US public opinion , 2016 .

[75]  Giuseppe Carrus,et al.  Environmental Beliefs and Endorsement of Sustainable Development Principles in Water Conservation , 2008 .

[76]  Troy D. Abel,et al.  A Value-Belief-Norm Theory of Support for Social Movements: The Case of Environmentalism , 1999 .