Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2015.

PROBLEM/CONDITION: Since the first U.S. infant conceived with assisted reproductive technology (ART) was born in 1981, both the use of ART and the number of fertility clinics providing ART services have increased steadily in the United States. ART includes fertility treatments in which eggs or embryos are handled in the laboratory (i.e., in vitro fertilization [IVF] and related procedures). Although the majority of infants conceived through ART are singletons, women who undergo ART procedures are more likely than women who conceive naturally to deliver multiple-birth infants. Multiple births pose substantial risks for both mothers and infants, including obstetric complications, preterm delivery ( 37 years). Among women aged <35 years, the national elective single-embryo transfer (eSET) rate was 34.7% (range: 11.3% in Puerto Rico to 88.1% in Delaware). In 2015, ART contributed to 1.7% of all infants born in the United States (range: 0.3% in Puerto Rico to 4.5% in Massachusetts). ART also contributed to 17.0% of all multiple-birth infants, 16.8% of all twin infants, and 22.2% of all triplets and higher-order infants. The percentage of multiple-birth infants was higher among infants conceived with ART (35.3%) than among all infants born in the total birth population (3.4%). Approximately 34.0% of ART-conceived infants were twins and 1.0% were triplets and higher-order infants. Nationally, infants conceived with ART contributed to 5.1% of all low birthweight infants. Among ART-conceived infants, 25.5% had low birthweight, compared with 8.1% among all infants. ART-conceived infants contributed to 5.3% of all preterm (gestational age <37 weeks) infants. The percentage of preterm births was higher among infants conceived with ART (31.2%) than among all infants born in the total birth population (9.7%). Among singletons, the percentage of ART-conceived infants who had low birthweight was 8.7% compared with 6.4% among all infants born. The percentage of ART-conceived infants who were born preterm was 13.4% among singletons compared with 7.9% among all infants. INTERPRETATION: Multiple births from ART contributed to a substantial proportion of all twins, triplets, and higher-order infants born in the United States. For women aged <35 years, who are typically considered good candidates for eSET, the national average of 1.6 embryos was transferred per ART procedure. Of the four states (Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Rhode Island) with comprehensive mandated health insurance coverage for ART procedures (i.e., coverage for at least four cycles of IVF), three (Illinois, Massachusetts, and New Jersey) had rates of ART use exceeding 1.5 times the national rate. This type of mandated insurance coverage has been associated with greater use of ART and likely accounts for some of the difference in per capita ART use observed among states. PUBLIC HEALTH ACTION: Twins account for the majority of ART-conceived multiple births. Reducing the number of embryos transferred and increasing use of eSET when clinically appropriate could help reduce multiple births and related adverse health consequences for both mothers and infants. State-based surveillance of ART might be useful for monitoring and evaluating maternal and infant health outcomes of ART in states with high ART use.

[1]  Alan S. Penzias,et al.  Guidance on the limits to the number of embryos to transfer: a committee opinion. , 2021, Fertility and sterility.

[2]  W. Barfield,et al.  Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance — United States, 2014 , 2017, Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries.

[3]  D. Kissin,et al.  Fertility Treatments in the United States: Improving Access and Outcomes. , 2016, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  M. Gissler,et al.  Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2012: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. , 2016, Human reproduction.

[5]  B. Luke,et al.  Factors associated with the use of elective single-embryo transfer and pregnancy outcomes in the United States, 2004-2012. , 2016, Fertility and sterility.

[6]  G. Copeland,et al.  Assisted Reproductive Technology and Birth Defects Among Liveborn Infants in Florida, Massachusetts, and Michigan, 2000-2010. , 2016, JAMA pediatrics.

[7]  D. Kissin,et al.  Costs of achieving live birth from assisted reproductive technology: a comparison of sequential single and double embryo transfer approaches. , 2015, Fertility and sterility.

[8]  W. Barfield,et al.  CDC releases a National Public Health Action Plan for the Detection, Prevention, and Management of Infertility. , 2015, Journal of women's health.

[9]  Morton B. Brown,et al.  Application of a validated prediction model for in vitro fertilization: comparison of live birth rates and multiple birth rates with 1 embryo transferred over 2 cycles vs 2 embryos in 1 cycle. , 2015, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  P. Bearman,et al.  Association between assisted reproductive technology conception and autism in California, 1997-2007. , 2015, American journal of public health.

[11]  L. Warner,et al.  Embryo transfer practices and multiple births resulting from assisted reproductive technology: an opportunity for prevention. , 2015, Fertility and sterility.

[12]  C. Coddington,et al.  Multiple pregnancy: changing expectations for patients and patterns for physicians. , 2015, Fertility and sterility.

[13]  J. Norman,et al.  Multiple pregnancies following assisted reproductive technologies--a happy consequence or double trouble? , 2014, Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine.

[14]  W. Barfield,et al.  Monitoring health outcomes of assisted reproductive technology. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  D. Kissin,et al.  Number of Embryos Transferred After In Vitro Fertilization and Good Perinatal Outcome , 2014, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  E. Adashi,et al.  Fertility treatments and multiple births in the United States. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  E. Lemos,et al.  Healthcare expenses associated with multiple vs singleton pregnancies in the United States. , 2013, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  H. Jones,et al.  Refuting a misguided campaign against the goal of single-embryo transfer and singleton birth in assisted reproduction. , 2013, Human reproduction.

[19]  D. Kissin,et al.  Embryo transfer practices and perinatal outcomes by insurance mandate status. , 2013, Fertility and sterility.

[20]  Denise V. D’Angelo,et al.  Assessment of Assisted Reproductive Technology Use Questions: Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System Survey, 2004 , 2012, Public health reports.

[21]  S. Bhattacharya,et al.  Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2012, Human reproduction update.

[22]  B. Hamilton,et al.  The effects of insurance mandates on choices and outcomes in infertility treatment markets. , 2012, Health economics.

[23]  Denise V. D’Angelo,et al.  Birth outcomes of intended pregnancies among women who used assisted reproductive technology, ovulation stimulation, or no treatment. , 2011, Fertility and sterility.

[24]  M. Bundorf,et al.  The effects of competition on assisted reproductive technology outcomes. , 2010, Fertility and sterility.

[25]  Michael R. Kramer,et al.  What causes racial disparities in very preterm birth? A biosocial perspective. , 2009, Epidemiologic reviews.

[26]  S. Rasmussen,et al.  Assisted reproductive technology and major structural birth defects in the United States. , 2009, Human reproduction.

[27]  L. Rombauts,et al.  Can an educational DVD improve the acceptability of elective single embryo transfer? A randomized controlled study. , 2008, Fertility and sterility.

[28]  O. Devine,et al.  Perinatal outcomes of twin births conceived using assisted reproduction technology: a population-based study. , 2008, Human reproduction.

[29]  B. V. Van Voorhis,et al.  A mandatory single blastocyst transfer policy with educational campaign in a United States IVF program reduces multiple gestation rates without sacrificing pregnancy rates. , 2007, Fertility and sterility.

[30]  L. Schieve,et al.  Pregnancy loss among pregnancies conceived through assisted reproductive technology, United States, 1999-2002. , 2007, American journal of epidemiology.

[31]  Assuring Healthy Outcomes,et al.  Preterm Birth : Causes , Consequences , and Prevention , 2005 .

[32]  W. Callaghan,et al.  The Contribution of Preterm Birth to Infant Mortality Rates in the United States , 2006, Pediatrics.

[33]  C. Berg,et al.  Pregnancy-Related Mortality Among Women With Multifetal Pregnancies , 2006, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[34]  L. Schieve,et al.  Trends in embryo transfer practices and multiple gestation for IVF procedures in the USA, 1996-2002. , 2006, Human reproduction.

[35]  C. Wren,et al.  Cardiovascular Malformations Among Preterm Infants , 2005, Pediatrics.

[36]  L. Schieve,et al.  Multiple-birth risk associated with IVF and extended embryo culture: USA, 2001. , 2005, Human reproduction.

[37]  D. Hellberg,et al.  The couple's decision-making in IVF: one or two embryos at transfer? , 2005, Human reproduction.

[38]  L. Schieve,et al.  Monozygotic twinning associated with day 5 embryo transfer in pregnancies conceived after IVF. , 2004, Human reproduction.

[39]  S. Bhattacharya,et al.  A randomized comparison of alternative methods of information provision on the acceptability of elective single embryo transfer. , 2004, Human reproduction.

[40]  L. Schieve,et al.  Live-birth rates and multiple-birth risk of assisted reproductive technology pregnancies conceived using thawed embryos, USA 1999-2000. , 2003, Human reproduction.

[41]  Gary Jeng,et al.  Trends in multiple births conceived using assisted reproductive technology, United States, 1997-2000. , 2003, Pediatrics.

[42]  Tarun Jain,et al.  Insurance coverage and outcomes of in vitro fertilization. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[43]  L. Schieve,et al.  Risk of multiple birth associated with in vitro fertilization using donor eggs. , 2001, American journal of epidemiology.

[44]  W. Grobman,et al.  Patient perceptions of multiple gestations: an assessment of knowledge and risk aversion. , 2001, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[45]  S. Rasmussen,et al.  Risk for birth defects among premature infants: a population-based study. , 2001, The Journal of pediatrics.

[46]  L. Schieve,et al.  Does assisted hatching pose a risk for monozygotic twinning in pregnancies conceived through in vitro fertilization? , 2000, Fertility and sterility.

[47]  L. Schieve,et al.  Live-birth rates and multiple-birth risk using in vitro fertilization. , 1999, JAMA.

[48]  D. Braat,et al.  Assisted Reproductive Technology , 2017, Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine.

[49]  J. Martin,et al.  Three decades of twin births in the United States, 1980-2009. , 2012, NCHS data brief.

[50]  S. Bhattacharya,et al.  Global variations in the uptake of single embryo transfer. , 2011, Human reproduction update.

[51]  M. Bundorf,et al.  Insurance mandates and trends in infertility treatments. , 2008, Fertility and sterility.

[52]  C. Dirksen,et al.  Economic evaluations of single- versus double-embryo transfer in IVF. , 2007, Human reproduction update.