Effect of Adaptive Threshold Filtering on Ultrasonic Nakagami Parameter to Detect Variation in Scatterer Concentration

The Nakagami parameter is associated with the Nakagami distribution estimated from ultrasonic backscattered signals and closely reflects the scatterer concentrations in tissues. There is an interest in exploring the possibility of enhancing the ability of the Nakagami parameter to characterize tissues. In this paper, we explore the effect of adaptive threshold filtering based on the noise-assisted empirical mode decomposition of the ultrasonic backscattered signals on the Nakagami parameter as a function of scatterer concentration for improving the Nakagami parameter performance. We carried out phantom experiments using 5 MHz focused and nonfocused transducers. Before filtering, the dynamic ranges of the Nakagami parameter, estimated using focused and nonfocused transducers between the scatterer concentrations of 2 and 32 scatterers/mm3, were 0.44 and 0.1, respectively. After filtering, the dynamic ranges of the Nakagami parameter, using the focused and nonfocused transducers, were 0.71 and 0.79, respectively. The experimental results showed that the adaptive threshold filter makes the Nakagami parameter measured by a focused transducer more sensitive to the variation in the scatterer concentration. The proposed method also endows the Nakagami parameter measured by a nonfocused transducer with the ability to differentiate various scatterer concentrations. However, the Nakagami parameters estimated by focused and nonfocused transducers after adaptive threshold filtering have different physical meanings: the former represents the statistics of signals backscattered from unresolvable scatterers while the latter is associated with stronger resolvable scatterers or local inhomogeneity due to scatterer aggregation.

[1]  B. Goldberg,et al.  Classification of ultrasonic B-mode images of breast masses using Nakagami distribution , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[2]  C. Burckhardt Speckle in ultrasound B-mode scans , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[3]  P M Shankar,et al.  A model for ultrasonic scattering from tissues based on the K distribution. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  P. Shankar,et al.  Ultrasound speckle analysis based on the K distribution. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  P M Shankar,et al.  The use of the compound probability density function in ultrasonic tissue characterization. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  K. Parker,et al.  Deviations from Rayleigh Statistics in Ultrasonic Speckle , 1988, Ultrasonic imaging.

[7]  W. A. Verhoef,et al.  Texture of B-Mode Echograms: 3-D Simulations and Experiments of the Effects of Diffraction and Scatterer Density , 1985 .

[8]  Gabriel Rilling,et al.  Empirical mode decomposition as a filter bank , 2004, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[9]  J. Greenleaf,et al.  Ultrasound Echo Envelope Analysis Using a Homodyned K Distribution Signal Model , 1994 .

[10]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Statistics of envelope of high-frequency ultrasonic backscatter from human skin in vivo , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[11]  Gabriel Rilling,et al.  Sampling Effects on the Empirical Mode Decomposition , 2009, Adv. Data Sci. Adapt. Anal..

[12]  J.M. Reid,et al.  Classification of ultrasonic B mode images of the breast using frequency diversity and Nakagami statistics , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[13]  T. Wilson,et al.  Intervening attenuation affects first-order statistical properties of ultrasound echo signals , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[14]  Chien-Cheng Chang,et al.  An adaptive threshold filter for ultrasound signal rejection. , 2009, Ultrasonics.

[15]  N. Huang,et al.  The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[16]  N. Huang,et al.  A new view of nonlinear water waves: the Hilbert spectrum , 1999 .

[17]  Chien-Cheng Chang,et al.  Feasibility study of using high-frequency ultrasonic Nakagami imaging for characterizing the cataract lens in vitro. , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  Rajeev Agrawal,et al.  Study of ultrasonic echo envelope based on Nakagami-inverse Gaussian distribution. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[19]  P. Tsui,et al.  The effect of transducer characteristics on the estimation of Nakagami paramater as a function of scatterer concentration. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[20]  V.A. Dumane,et al.  Use of frequency diversity and Nakagami statistics in ultrasonic tissue characterization , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[21]  Chien-Cheng Chang,et al.  Imaging local scatterer concentrations by the Nakagami statistical model. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[22]  P. Shankar A general statistical model for ultrasonic backscattering from tissues , 2000 .

[23]  P.M. Shankar,et al.  A compound scattering pdf for the ultrasonic echo envelope and its relationship to K and Nakagami distributions , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[24]  Saralees Nadarajah,et al.  Statistical distributions of potential interest in ultrasound speckle analysis , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  Chien-Cheng Chang,et al.  Performance Evaluation of Ultrasonic Nakagami Image in Tissue Characterization , 2008, Ultrasonic imaging.