From a marketplace of electronics to a digital entrepreneurial ecosystem (DEE): The emergence of a meta‐organization in Zhongguancun, China

Extant studies on digital entrepreneurship have mainly focused on firm‐level characteristics and overlooked the external environment, ie, the digital entrepreneurial ecosystem (DEE). This study intends to fill that gap by exploring how a DEE emerges. We adopt the meta‐organization theory as our theoretical lens and conduct an in‐depth case study at Zhongguancun, a budding DEE often referred to as China's Silicon Valley. Case analysis reveals that the emergence of a DEE is a process of forming a meta‐organization, whereby labour is divided into 3 roles and effort is integrated via 2 processes. Our study contributes to the digital entrepreneurship literature by offering a community perspective. It also contributes to the literature on meta‐organization, which has mainly focused on the globally distributed meta‐organizations and overlooked the collocated meta‐organizations such as a DEE. Regarding practical implications, policymakers and community leaders responsible for DEE development can use our findings to develop their local DEEs.

[1]  Christine Moser,et al.  Communicative genres as organising structures in online communities – of team players and storytellers , 2013, Inf. Syst. J..

[2]  Josep Lluís Cano Giner,et al.  Technology Ecosystem Governance , 2013, Organ. Sci..

[3]  R. Nelson,et al.  American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry , 1994 .

[4]  Lakshmi Goel,et al.  Exploring the dynamics of blog communities: the case of MetaFilter , 2009, Inf. Syst. J..

[5]  Sue Newell,et al.  Strategy, Resource Orchestration and E-commerce Enabled Social Innovation in Rural China , 2017, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Elizabeth J. Davidson,et al.  Digital Entrepreneurship and Its Sociomaterial Enactment , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[7]  Llewellyn D. W. Thomas,et al.  Modeling the ecosystem: a meta-synthesis of ecosystem and related literatures , 2012 .

[8]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  Local Entrepreneurship in Context , 2012 .

[9]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Digitally enabled affordances for community‐driven environmental movement in rural Malaysia , 2018, Inf. Syst. J..

[10]  P. Puranam,et al.  Integrating Distributed Work: Comparing Task Design, Communication and Tacit Coordination Mechanisms , 2008 .

[11]  Teemu Kautonen,et al.  Regional Social Legitimacy of Entrepreneurship: Implications for Entrepreneurial Intention and Start-up Behaviour , 2014 .

[12]  S. Nambisan Digital Entrepreneurship: Toward a Digital Technology Perspective of Entrepreneurship , 2017 .

[13]  Christos N. Pitelis,et al.  Clusters, entrepreneurial ecosystem co-creation, and appropriability: A conceptual framework , 2012 .

[14]  Sue Newell,et al.  The Emergence of Self-Organizing E-Commerce Ecosystems in Remote Villages of China: A Tale of Digital Empowerment for Rural Development , 2016, MIS Q..

[15]  Sonali K. Shah Motivation, Governance, and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[16]  Arvind Parkhe,et al.  Orchestrating Innovation Networks , 2006 .

[17]  J. Manyika,et al.  Disruptive technologies: Advances that will transform life, business, and the global economy , 2013 .

[18]  Prabin Khakurel,et al.  Measuring an entrepreneurial ecosystem , 2018 .

[19]  Richard T. Harrison,et al.  Voodoo Institution or Entrepreneurial University? Spin-off Companies, the Entrepreneurial System and Regional Development in the UK , 2010 .

[20]  Claudia Loebbecke,et al.  Commoditized digital processes and business community platforms: new opportunities and challenges for digital business strategies , 2013 .

[21]  AnnaLee Saxenian,et al.  The Silicon Valley Connection: Transnational Networks and Regional Development in Taiwan, China and India , 2002 .

[22]  Mümin Kurtulus,et al.  Retail Assortment Planning Under Category Captainship , 2010, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[23]  Paul Fox,et al.  Technology Ecosystem Governance , 2013 .

[24]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  Context is king! Considering particularism in research design and reporting , 2016, J. Inf. Technol..

[25]  Pamela Jordan Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques , 1994 .

[26]  Susan L. Cohen What Do Accelerators Do? Insights from Incubators and Angels , 2013, Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization.

[27]  Clay Shirky Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations , 2008 .

[28]  J. A. Carrillo-Castrillo,et al.  Success variables in science and technology parks , 2016 .

[29]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation and Strategy , 2007 .

[30]  M. Tushman,et al.  Meta‐organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts , 2012 .

[31]  John Lim,et al.  Retaining and attracting users in social networking services: An empirical investigation of cyber migration , 2014, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Varun Grover,et al.  Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms , 2003, MIS Q..

[33]  Barney Tan,et al.  Demystifying case research: A structured-pragmatic-situational (SPS) approach to conducting case studies , 2011, Inf. Organ..

[34]  Yunjie Calvin Xu,et al.  Information Seeking in an Information Systems Project Team , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[35]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Digitally enabled crime-fighting communities: Harnessing the boundary spanning competence of social media for civic engagement , 2017, Inf. Manag..

[36]  Dane Stangler,et al.  Measuring an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem , 2015 .

[37]  Deborah Perry Piscione Secrets of Silicon Valley: What Everyone Else Can Learn from the Innovation Capital of the World , 2013 .

[38]  F. Sautet,et al.  Entrepreneurial Policy: The Case of Regional Specialization vs. Spontaneous Industrial Diversity , 2008 .

[39]  Nils Brunsson,et al.  Organizations and meta-organizations , 2005 .

[40]  M. Reitzig,et al.  What’s ‘New’ About New Forms of Organizing? , 2013 .

[41]  Anindya Ghose,et al.  An Empirical Examination of the Antecedents and Consequences of Contribution Patterns in Crowd-Funded Markets , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[42]  B. Spigel The Relational Organization of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems , 2017 .

[43]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[44]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  IT and Entrepreneurism: An On-Again, Off-Again Love Affair or a Marriage? , 2011 .

[45]  C. Gibson,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[46]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[47]  Johanna L. Francis,et al.  Creating a Cluster While Building a Firm: Entrepreneurs and the Formation of Industrial Clusters , 2005 .

[48]  Aaron K. Chatterji,et al.  Spawned with a silver spoon? Entrepreneurial performance and innovation in the medical device industry , 2009 .

[49]  Øystein D. Fjeldstad,et al.  The architecture of collaboration , 2012 .

[50]  Brian L. Dos Santos,et al.  Venture Capital Funding for Information Technology Businesses , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[51]  Chrisanthi Avgerou,et al.  Relational and institutional embeddedness of Web‐enabled entrepreneurial networks: case studies of netrepreneurs in China , 2013, Inf. Syst. J..

[52]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[53]  Steven Casper,et al.  How do technology clusters emerge and become sustainable? Social network formation and inter-firm mobility within the San Diego biotechnology cluster , 2007 .

[54]  Veroniek Collewaert,et al.  Angel Investors’ and Entrepreneurs’ Intentions to Exit Their Ventures: A Conflict Perspective , 2012 .

[55]  Yun Xu,et al.  The role of multidimensional social capital in crowdfunding: A comparative study in China and US , 2014, Inf. Manag..