The pursuit of multiple objectives in face‐to‐face persuasive interactions: Effects of construct differentiation on message organization

This is paper describes the development of a system for analyzing the management of multiple communicative goals in interpersonal arguments. The message analysis system was designed to classify conversationally produced messages in terms of (1) the communicative role of the message producer; (2) the position taken toward the issue on the floor; (3) the explicitness with which conflict is acknowledged; and (4) the manner in which the subsidiary communicative goals of face protection and interaction maintenance are managed. In an initial investigation using this system, differential reliance on goal management strategies was associated, on the one hand, with individual differences in construct differentiation, and on the other hand, with differing degrees of interpersonal success. Associations among the four dimensions of the message analysis system were also observed, and were consistent with a rational goal‐based analysis of communication.

[1]  H. Grice.  Logic and conversation , 1975 .

[2]  M. Fitzpatrick,et al.  You always hurt the one you love: Strategies and tactics in interpersonal conflict , 1979 .

[3]  Susan L. Kline,et al.  The development of persuasive communication strategies in kindergarteners through twelfth‐graders , 1979 .

[4]  W. H. Crockett.  Cognitive complexity and impression formation. , 1965, Progress in experimental personality research.

[5]  William A. Donohue.  ANALYZING NEGOTIATION TACTICS: DEVELOPMENT OF A NEGOTIATION INTERACT SYSTEM , 1981 .

[6]  Alan L. Sillars.  The Sequential and Distributional Structure of Conflict Interactions as a Function of Attributions Concerning the Locus of Responsibility and Stability of Conflicts , 1980 .

[7]  D. Kipnis,et al.  Intraorganizational Influence Tactics: Explorations in Getting One's Way , 1980 .

[8]  B. Maher,et al.  Progress in experimental personality research , 1964 .

[9]  Sally Jackson,et al.  Strategy and structure in conversational influence attempts , 1983 .

[10]  K. Tracy.  The effect of multiple goals on conversational relevance and topic shift , 1984 .

[11]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  Reciprocity in negotiations: An analysis of bargaining interaction , 1982 .

[12]  H. Guetzkow.  Unitizing and categorizing problems in coding qualitative data , 1950 .

[13]  G. Miller,et al.  Handbook of Interpersonal Communication , 1985 .

[14]  Michael C. Corballis,et al.  Beyond tests of significance: Estimating strength of effects in selected ANOVA designs. , 1969 .

[15]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[16]  P. Brown,et al.  Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena , 1978 .

[17]  C. Riggs.  Dimensions of Organizational Conflict: A Functional Analysis of Communication Tactics , 1983 .

[18]  William R. Beardslee,et al.  Assessing adolescent interpersonal negotiation strategies: Toward the integration of structural and functional models. , 1986 .

[19]  A. Koller,et al.  Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language , 1969 .

[20]  P. Watzlawick,et al.  Pragmatics of human communication , 1975 .

[21]  Thomas D. Beisecker.  Verbal persuasive strategies in mixed‐motive interactions , 1970 .

[22]  Brant R. Burleson,et al.  The Development of Comforting Communication Skills in Childhood and Adolescence. , 1982 .

[23]  Margaret McLaughlin,et al.  Conversation: How Talk Is Organized , 1984 .

[24]  R. Freedle.  Discourse production and comprehension , 1978 .

[25]  James L. Applegate.  Adaptive Communication in Educational Contexts: A Study of Teachers' Communicative Strategies. , 1980 .