The impacts of job and household decentralization on commuting distances and travel modes Experiences from the Copenhagen region and other Nordic urban areas

The main topic of this article is the influence of urban sprawl on commuting distances and modes of travel. This is an issue much debated in the urban planning literature. In particular, this discussion has been vivid as objectives of environmentally sustainable mobility appeared on planners’ agenda in the wake of the report from the World Commission on Environment and Development . More recently, the Kyoto protocol implies an obligation for the European Union to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 8 % within 2010, compared to the 1990 level. The internally agreed distribution of emissions between EU countries implies that some countries, such as Denmark and Germany, are obliged to reduce their emissions by more than 20 per cent. Obtaining these objectives may prove difficult unless current trends within the transportation sector are changed dramatically. For example, based on current transport policies, the emissions from the transportation sector will make up 32 % of the internationally agreed limit for the total, national CO 2 emissions in Denmark in 2010, compared to 21 % in 1997.

[1]  Dominic Stead,et al.  The Relationships between Urban Form and Travel Patterns. An International Review and Evaluation , 2001, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research.

[2]  Peter Newman,et al.  Cities and automobile dependence , 1993 .

[3]  J. Brotchie Technological Change and Urban Form , 1984 .

[4]  T. Sieverts Zwischenstadt: Zwischen Ort und Welt, Raum und Zeit, Stadt und Land , 1999 .

[5]  Petter Naess,et al.  Workplace Location, Modal Split and Energy Use for Commuting Trips , 1996 .

[6]  Petter Næss,et al.  Energy Use for Transportation in 22 Nordic Towns , 1996 .

[7]  Petter Næss,et al.  Travelling Distances, Modal Split and Transportation Energy in Thirty Residential Areas in Oslo , 1995 .

[8]  Petter Næss,et al.  Are Short Daily Trips Compensated by Higher Leisure Mobility? , 2006 .

[9]  Jeffrey Kenworthy,et al.  Sustainability and Cities: Overcoming Automobile Dependence , 1999 .

[10]  John F. McDonald,et al.  Determinants of Commuting Time and Distance for Seoul Residents: The Impact of Family Status on the Commuting of Women , 2003 .

[11]  Petter Næss Accessibility, Activity Participation and Location of Activities: Exploring the Links between Residential Location and Travel Behaviour , 2006 .

[12]  M. Dijst,et al.  Travel behaviour in Dutch monocentric and policentric urban systems , 2001 .

[13]  Petter Næss Urban structure matters , 2007 .

[14]  M. Breheny The compact city and transport energy consumption , 1995 .

[15]  Petter Næss Residential location affects travel behavior: but how and why? the case of Copenhagen metropolitan area , 2005 .

[16]  Ole B. Jensen,et al.  Urban structure matters, even in a small town , 2004 .

[17]  Petter Næss,et al.  Transportation energy in Swedish towns and regions , 1993 .

[18]  Petter Næss Residential location and travel in Hangzhou Metropolitan Area , 2007 .