Short term implantation studies of periodontal dressings.

A modified implantation technique was used to study the early tissue reactions to three periodontal dressings (Coe-pak, Peripac, and Wondrpak). The dressings were placed in contact with an intact non-epithelialized tissue surface for 15 minutes and 3 days. The tissue reactions were assessed by histochemical and histological techniques. After 15 minutes of tissue-material contact, the most severe tissue reactions were caused by Wondrpak. When the contact period was increased to 3 days, Peripac generally showed a more severe tissue response than Wondrpak. At both contact periods Coe-pak had caused the mildest reactions.

[1]  I. Mjör,et al.  Methodological assessments of subcutaneous implantation techniques. , 1980, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[2]  I. Mjör,et al.  Bone tissue reactions to periodontal dressings. , 1979, Journal of periodontal research.

[3]  A. Hensten-Pettersen,et al.  The Sensitizing Potential of Periodontal Dressings , 1978, Journal of dental research.

[4]  I. Mjör,et al.  Subcutaneous implants for assessments of dental materials with emphasis on periodontal dressings. , 1978, Journal of periodontal research.

[5]  P. Gjermo,et al.  Clinical assessment of periodontal dressings. , 1978, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[6]  A. Wennberg,et al.  A method for evaluation of initial tissue response to biomaterials. , 1978, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[7]  N. Gjerdet,et al.  Dimensional Changes of Periodontal Dressings , 1977, Journal of dental research.

[8]  R. Oglesby,et al.  Presence of adipose fat as a criterion of implant compatibility. , 1977, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[9]  W. H. Lawrence,et al.  Development of a toxicity evaluation program for dental materials and products. I. Screening for irritant responses. , 1970, Journal of biomedical materials research.