Predicting Individual Treatment Effects of Large-scale Team Competitions in a Ride-sharing Economy

Millions of drivers worldwide have enjoyed financial benefits and work schedule flexibility through a ride-sharing economy, but meanwhile they have suffered from the lack of a sense of identity and career achievement. Equipped with social identity and contest theories, financially incentivized team competitions have been an effective instrument to increase drivers' productivity, job satisfaction, and retention, and to improve revenue over cost for ride-sharing platforms. While these competitions are overall effective, the decisive factors behind the treatment effects and how they affect the outcomes of individual drivers have been largely mysterious. In this study, we analyze data collected from more than 500 large-scale team competitions organized by a leading ride-sharing platform, building machine learning models to predict individual treatment effects. Through a careful investigation of features and predictors, we are able to reduce out-sample prediction error by more than 24%. Through interpreting the best-performing models, we discover many novel and actionable insights regarding how to optimize the design and the execution of team competitions on ride-sharing platforms. A simulated analysis demonstrates that by simply changing a few contest design options, the average treatment effect of a real competition is expected to increase by as much as 26%. Our procedure and findings shed light on how to analyze and optimize large-scale online field experiments in general.

[1]  Susan Athey,et al.  Recursive partitioning for heterogeneous causal effects , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Sean J. Taylor,et al.  Social Influence Bias: A Randomized Experiment , 2013, Science.

[3]  Uri Shalit,et al.  Estimating individual treatment effect: generalization bounds and algorithms , 2016, ICML.

[4]  Joaquin Quiñonero Candela,et al.  Counterfactual reasoning and learning systems: the example of computational advertising , 2012, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[5]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  Online controlled experiments at large scale , 2013, KDD.

[6]  Stefan Siersdorfer,et al.  Groupsourcing: Team Competition Designs for Crowdsourcing , 2015, WWW.

[7]  Tannaz Moin,et al.  A randomized, controlled trial of team-based competition to increase learner participation in quality-improvement education. , 2016, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[8]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[9]  Beibei Li,et al.  A Quasi-experimental Estimate of the Impact of P2P Transportation Platforms on Urban Consumer Patterns , 2017, KDD.

[10]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  The Value of Flexible Work: Evidence from Uber Drivers , 2017, Journal of Political Economy.

[11]  Luca Becchetti,et al.  Online team formation in social networks , 2012, WWW.

[12]  Alain Pinsonneault,et al.  Electronic Brainstorming: The Illusion of Productivity , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[13]  Adith Swaminathan,et al.  A Distillation Approach to Data Efficient Individual Treatment Effect Estimation , 2019, AAAI.

[14]  Rainer Alt,et al.  Sharing Economy , 2016, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[15]  Joaquin Quiñonero Candela,et al.  Counterfactual reasoning and learning systems: the example of computational advertising , 2013, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[16]  V. S. Subrahmanian,et al.  Predicting human behavior: The next frontiers , 2017, Science.

[17]  Arthur E. Hoerl,et al.  Ridge Regression: Biased Estimation for Nonorthogonal Problems , 2000, Technometrics.

[18]  George A. Akerlof,et al.  Economics and Identity , 2000 .

[19]  Yueting Zhuang,et al.  What Makes a Good Team? A Large-scale Study on the Effect of Team Composition in Honor of Kings , 2019, WWW.

[20]  Benjamin E. Hermalin Toward an Economic Theory of Leadership: Leading by Example , 1997 .

[21]  Ruth Kanfer,et al.  Age and gender diversity as determinants of performance and health in a public organization: the role of task complexity and group size. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[22]  Qiaozhu Mei,et al.  Recommending teams promotes prosocial lending in online microfinance , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  --Understanding Effects of Proximity on Collaboration : Implications for Technologies to Support Remote Collaborative Work , 2001 .

[24]  Juho Hamari,et al.  The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[25]  Ruocheng Guo Learning Individual Causal Effects from Networked Observational Data , 2020, WSDM.

[26]  Milan Vojnovic,et al.  Contest Theory: Incentive Mechanisms and Ranking Methods , 2016 .

[27]  Qiaozhu Mei,et al.  Does team competition increase pro-social lending? Evidence from online microfinance , 2017, Games Econ. Behav..

[28]  B. Moldovanu,et al.  Contests for Status , 2005, Journal of Political Economy.

[29]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. , 1998 .

[30]  Jieping Ye,et al.  Recommendation-based Team Formation for On-demand Taxi-calling Platforms , 2019, CIKM.

[31]  Joshua D. Angrist,et al.  Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion , 2008 .

[32]  Thorsten Joachims,et al.  The Self-Normalized Estimator for Counterfactual Learning , 2015, NIPS.

[33]  Adam Wierman,et al.  Prices and Subsidies in the Sharing Economy , 2016, WWW.

[34]  Gang Fang,et al.  Applying machine learning to predict real-world individual treatment effects: insights from a virtual patient cohort , 2019, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[35]  J. Friedman Stochastic gradient boosting , 2002 .

[36]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Network Analysis in the Social Sciences , 2009, Science.