Entry timing, exploration, and firm survival in the early U.S. bicycle industry

We explore the relationship between a firm's entry timing and its probability of surviving the early, uncertain period of its industry, and consider the trade-off between entering early and potentially establishing a strong position in the industry vs. waiting until technological uncertainty is reduced. We hypothesize that, owing to inertial forces, firms that enter the industry at the earliest point in its history are least likely to make the conversion to the product generation that becomes the dominant design in the industry. Exploration through the introduction of new products appears to reflect a local search process and retards the transition to the dominant design. We also hypothesize that, though firms entering early may exhibit longer life spans, their advantages are limited to the period before the emergence of the dominant design. We test our hypotheses in the early U.S. bicycle industry, and find evidence consistent with the idea that inertia limits firms' abilities to make the transition between generations of product configurations. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  K. Srinivasan,et al.  Broader product line: a necessity to achieve success? , 1990 .

[2]  Glenn R. Carroll,et al.  Concentration and Specialization: Dynamics of Niche Width in Populations of Organizations , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[3]  G. Dosi Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories , 1993 .

[4]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Strategies for Survival in Fast-Changing Industries , 1998 .

[5]  G. Carroll,et al.  Density Delay in the Evolution of Organizational Populations: A Model and Five Empirical Tests , 1989 .

[6]  T. P. Hughes Networks of power : electrification in Western society, 1880-1930 , 1984 .

[7]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[8]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[9]  James N. Baron,et al.  The Road Taken: Origins and Evolution of Employment Systems in Emerging Companies , 1996 .

[10]  R. Katila,et al.  SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF SEARCH BEHAVIOR AND NEW PRODUCT INTRODUCTION , 2002 .

[11]  M. Tushman,et al.  On the Organizational Determinants of Technological Change: Towards a Sociology of Technological Evolution , 1992 .

[12]  Glenn R. Carroll,et al.  Cascading Organizational Change , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[13]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[14]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society , 1984 .

[15]  Donald E. Hatfield,et al.  Doomed from the start: what is the value of selecting a future dominant design? , 1999 .

[16]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change , 1990 .

[17]  Dong-Sung Cho,et al.  Latecomer Strategies: Evidence From the Semiconductor Industry in Japan and Korea , 1998 .

[18]  Robert A. Burgelman Intraorganizational Ecology of Strategy Making and Organizational Adaptation: Theory and Field Research , 1991 .

[19]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[20]  Warren Boeker,et al.  Strategic Change: The Effects Of Founding And History , 1989 .

[21]  D. B. Montgomery,et al.  First-mover (dis)advantages: Retrospective and link with the resource-based view , 1998 .

[22]  Taylor Randall,et al.  Product Variety, Supply Chain Structure, and Firm Performance: Analysis of the U.S. Bicycle Industry , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[23]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma , 1997 .

[24]  M. Hannan Rethinking Age Dependence in Organizational Mortality: Logical Fromalizations1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.

[25]  Mustafa Uzumeri,et al.  The Innovation Imperative: Strategies for Managing Product Models and Families , 1996 .

[26]  James M. Utterback,et al.  A dynamic model of process and product innovation , 1975 .

[27]  Bruce J. Hunt,et al.  The Continuous Wave: Technology and American Radio, 1900-1932 , 1985 .

[28]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  Too Much of a Good Thing? Product Proliferation and Organizational Failure , 2001 .

[29]  Anand Swaminathan,et al.  Racing and Back-Pedalling into the Future: New Product Introduction and Organizational Mortality in the US Bicycle Industry, 1880-1918 , 2000 .

[30]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Dominant Designs and the Survival of Firms , 1995 .

[31]  T. Pinch,et al.  The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other , 1984 .

[32]  C. K. Prahalad,et al.  THE DOMINANT LOGIC: RETROSPECTIVE AND EXTENSION , 1995 .

[33]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Standard Setting in High-Definition Television , 1992 .

[34]  Jesper B. Sørensen,et al.  Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation , 2000 .

[35]  H. Greve Performance, Aspirations, and Risky Organizational Change , 1998 .

[36]  Richard N. Foster,et al.  Timing technological transitions , 1985 .

[37]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Evolution: A Metamorphosis Model of Convergence and Reorientation , 1985 .

[38]  Hans-Peter Blossfeld,et al.  Techniques of event history modeling : new approaches to causal analysis , 2001 .

[39]  N. Phillips,et al.  The concept of industry and the case of radical technological change , 2002 .

[40]  S. Klepper Industry Life Cycles , 1997 .

[41]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  The red queen in organizational evolution , 2007 .

[42]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[43]  O. Sorenson Letting the market work for you: an evolutionary perspective on product strategy , 2000 .

[44]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[45]  Mark Jenkins,et al.  Trajectories in the Evolution of Technology: A Multi-Level Study of Competition in Formula 1 Racing , 2001 .

[46]  G. Dosi Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[47]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[48]  James B. Wade A Community-Level Analysis of Sources and Rates of Technological Variation in the Microprocessor Market , 1996 .

[49]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  MODELING INTERNAL ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE , 1995 .

[50]  A. Stinchcombe Social Structure and Organizations , 2000, Political Organizations.

[51]  Johann Peter Murmann,et al.  Dominant Designs, Technological Cycles and Organizational Outcomes , 2002 .

[52]  Robert A. Burgelman Fading Memories: A Process Theory of Strategic Business Exit in Dynamic Environments , 1994 .

[53]  M. Hannan,et al.  A Time to Grow and a Time to Die: Growth and Mortality of Credit Unions in New York City, 1914-1990 , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[54]  Glenn R. Carroll,et al.  Creative Self-Destruction among Organizations: An Empirical Study of Technical Innovation and Organizational Failure in the American Automobile Industry, 1885-1981 , 1996 .

[55]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[56]  J. March,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 1964 .

[57]  Daniel A. Levinthal Adaptation on rugged landscapes , 1997 .

[58]  G. Dosi Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation , 1988 .