Proposing behavior-oriented strategies for earthquake emergency evacuation: A behavioral data analysis from New Zealand, Italy and Japan

Abstract Individuals’ safety in an earthquake highly depends on human reactions and emergency behaviours, especially in first evacuation phases and in urban scenarios. To increase community resilience, Civil Defense Bodies in several earthquake prone countries have defined a list of recommended behaviours to take during and after an earthquake. Following those recommended behaviours could avoid exposing people to additional risks and allow them to reach an effective help from rescuers. Nevertheless, previous studies suggested that differences between recommended behaviors and real-life actions exist and increase the probabilities of casualties. Hence, solutions to assist communities in reducing the occurrence of such “unsafe” phenomena are needed. In this work, we adopt a behavioral approach to examine spontaneous real-life behaviours observed through a database of videotapes of earthquakes from New Zealand, Italy, and Japan. The presence of response actions recommended by Civil Defense Bodies of those three Countries is also assessed. Observed behaviors are organized according to evacuation phases, and comparisons between the three Countries results are provided. An uncertainty assessment is performed to investigate the sample size impact on the proposed analysis. Finally, behavioral results are employed to trace possible valuable solutions aimed at increasing community resilience and individuals’ safety, by limiting the impact of hazardous spontaneous behaviors and providing an effective support to evacuees’ decisions as well as possible. Main solutions categories include assistance tools (e.g.: building components, individual devices), educational training (e.g.: by using serious games), evacuation plans according to the probable evacuation process.

[1]  Jaime Santos-Reyes,et al.  Earthquake Risk Perception and Mexico City's Public Safety , 2014 .

[2]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[3]  K. Ronan,et al.  The role of prior experience in informing and motivating earthquake preparedness , 2017 .

[4]  Nick Chater,et al.  Herding in humans , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Pedestrian, Crowd and Evacuation Dynamics , 2013, Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science.

[6]  Dani Gamerman,et al.  Markov Chain Monte Carlo: Stochastic Simulation for Bayesian Inference , 1997 .

[7]  Ali Asghar Alesheikh,et al.  GIS: agent-based modeling and evaluation of an earthquake-stricken area with a case study in Tehran, Iran , 2013, Natural Hazards.

[8]  Masahiro Inoue,et al.  An Evacuation Route Planning for Safety Route Guidance System after Natural Disaster Using Multi-objective Genetic Algorithm , 2016, KES.

[9]  Yasamin O. Izadkhah,et al.  Main challenges on community-based approaches in earthquake risk reduction: case study of Tehran, Iran , 2014 .

[10]  Michael J. Pennock,et al.  Social media applications and emergency management: A literature review and research agenda , 2018, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction.

[11]  Hong Guan,et al.  A smart phone-based system for post-earthquake investigations of building damage , 2018 .

[12]  Zhongliang Wu,et al.  Difference between real-life escape panic and mimic exercises in simulated situation with implications to the statistical physics models of emergency evacuation: The 2008 Wenchuan earthquake , 2011 .

[13]  Jie Shan,et al.  A comprehensive review of earthquake-induced building damage detection with remote sensing techniques , 2013 .

[14]  Elise Beck,et al.  A Review on the Influence of Social Attachment on Human Mobility During Crises , 2017, ISCRAM.

[15]  G. Grünthal European Macroseismic Scale 1998 , 1998 .

[16]  Enrico Quagliarini,et al.  Dynamic guidance tool for a safer earthquake pedestrian evacuation in urban systems , 2017, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[17]  Li-Lin Rao,et al.  Disadvantage and prosocial behavior: the effects of the Wenchuan earthquake , 2011 .

[18]  Erol Gelenbe,et al.  Resilient Emergency Evacuation Using Opportunistic Communications , 2012, ISCIS.

[19]  Enrico Quagliarini,et al.  Towards a "behavioural design" approach for seismic risk reduction strategies of buildings and their environment , 2016 .

[20]  T. Wilson,et al.  Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) Earthquake Behaviour Coding Methodology: analysis of Christchurch Public Hospital video data from the 22 February Christchurch earthquake event , 2017, Natural Hazards.

[21]  Bauke de Vries,et al.  Building safety and human behaviour in fire : a literature review , 2010 .

[22]  A. Mawson,et al.  Mass Panic and Social Attachment: The Dynamics of Human Behavior , 2012 .

[23]  Daniela Isidori,et al.  Damage detection in a precast structure subjected to an earthquake: A numerical approach , 2016 .

[24]  S. Schmidt,et al.  Better safe than sorry - Emergency knowledge and preparedness in the German population , 2017 .

[25]  Mubashir Husain Rehmani,et al.  Applications of wireless sensor networks for urban areas: A survey , 2016, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[26]  Xiaolin Yang,et al.  Civilian monitoring video records for earthquake intensity: a potentially unbiased online information source of macro-seismology , 2012, Natural Hazards.

[27]  Zhi-Hua Hu,et al.  Post-disaster evacuation and temporary resettlement considering panic and panic spread , 2014, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.

[28]  Enrico Quagliarini,et al.  Towards creating a combined database for earthquake pedestrians’ evacuation models , 2016 .

[29]  Daniel Nilsson,et al.  Enhancing egress drills: Preparation and assessment of evacuee performance , 2019 .

[30]  C.-a. Tai,et al.  A STUDY OF EVACUATION BEHAVIOR DURING EARTHQUAKES , 2014 .

[31]  Rakesh Kumar Jha,et al.  Device-to-Device Communication in Cellular Networks: A Survey , 2016, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[32]  Erik Brogt,et al.  Human behaviour during and immediately following earthquake shaking: developing a methodological approach for analysing video footage , 2015, Natural Hazards.

[33]  Carlos E. Palau,et al.  Technologies of Internet of Things applied to an Earthquake Early Warning System , 2017, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[34]  David Alexander,et al.  What can we do about earthquakes? Towards a systematic approach to seismic risk mitigation. , 2012 .

[35]  Natalie Fridman,et al.  The impact of culture on crowd dynamics: an empirical approach , 2013, AAMAS.

[36]  Hubert Klüpfel,et al.  Evacuation Dynamics: Empirical Results, Modeling and Applications , 2009, Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science.

[37]  Nuno Sousa,et al.  Design of evacuation plans for densely urbanised city centres , 2016 .

[38]  Edwin R. Galea,et al.  Investigating the impact of culture on evacuation response behaviour , 2015 .

[39]  Ragnar Sigbjörnsson,et al.  Perception and observation of residential safety during earthquake exposure: A case study , 2006 .

[40]  Luca Pietrantoni,et al.  Emotional and behavioural reactions to tremors of the Umbria-Marche earthquake. , 2012, Disasters.

[41]  K. Mora,et al.  Public perceptions of building seismic safety following the Canterbury earthquakes: a qualitative analysis using Twitter and focus groups , 2015 .

[42]  Céline Lutoff,et al.  The street as an area of human exposure in an earthquake aftermath: the case of Lorca, Spain, 2011 , 2017 .

[43]  Paolo Zampieri,et al.  Post-quake urban road network functionality assessment for seismic emergency management in historical centres , 2017 .

[44]  Kincho H. Law,et al.  Simulating individual, group, and crowd behaviors in building egress , 2015, Simul..

[45]  Fran H. Norris,et al.  Predicting Evacuation in Two Major Disasters: Risk Perception, Social Influence, and Access to Resources , 1999 .

[46]  Ruggiero Lovreglio,et al.  Prototyping Virtual Reality Serious Games for Building Earthquake Preparedness: The Auckland City Hospital Case Study , 2018, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[47]  Enrico Ronchi,et al.  An Evacuation Decision Model based on perceived risk, social influence and behavioural uncertainty , 2016, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[48]  A. R. Syversveen,et al.  NONINFORMATIVE BAYESIAN PRIORS � INTERPRETATION AND PROBLEMS WITH CONSTRUCTION AND APPLICATIONS , 1998 .

[49]  Nirajan Shiwakoti,et al.  Video-based analysis of school students' emergency evacuation behavior in earthquakes , 2016 .

[50]  Jiqiang Guo,et al.  Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language. , 2017, Journal of statistical software.

[51]  Yi Ma,et al.  Effective leadership for crowd evacuation , 2016 .

[52]  Luca Pietrantoni,et al.  The 2012 Northern Italy Earthquakes: modelling human behaviour , 2013, Natural Hazards.