In The Netherlands, on bicycle paths, single-bicycle accidents, bicycle-bicycle and bicycle-moped accidents constitute a considerable share of all bicyclist injuries. Over three quarters of all hospitalised bicyclist victims in the Netherlands cannot be directly related to a crash with motorised traffic. As the usage of bicycle paths steadily increases, it is to be expected that safety on bicycle paths will become a major issue in the coming years in The Netherlands. A study was conducted into the behaviour of bicyclists and moped riders to improve traffic safety on bicycle paths. By behavioural observations with video, mutual conflicts and bicyclist behaviour on bicycle paths were recorded and analysed, among other things by means of the conflict observation method DOCTOR (Dutch Objective Conflict Technique for Operation and Research). The explorative phase of the study (phase 1), included two research locations, one in the city of Amsterdam and one in Eindhoven. The results gave guidance for a better understanding of the behaviour between different users of separate two-directional bicycle paths. An example includes the relationship between bicyclist-moped rider behaviour and the width of the bicycle path. For a condition with busy bicycle traffic in both directions the width of the bicycle path in Amsterdam (effectively 3.55m) is relatively narrow, whereas the bicycle path width in Eindhoven (>4.94m) appears to be sufficient to accommodate large flows of bicyclists. Because of a large flow of crossing pedestrians resulting in (severe) conflicts with bicyclists in Amsterdam, additional countermeasures to better control these interactions are needed. The DOCTOR conflict observation method from video appears to be applicable for conflicts between intersecting road users and for head-on conflicts on the bicycle path. Conflict situations between bicyclists in the same direction (constituting an important share of injury accidents on bicycle paths) require an additional and more general systematic observation of specific behaviour. Therefore, phase 2 of the project will focus in particular on interactions between bicycle path users in the same direction and underlying processes.
[1]
Åse Svensson,et al.
A method for analysing the traffic process in a safety perspective
,
1998
.
[2]
Melissa J. Williams,et al.
Validity of the traffic conflicts technique
,
1981
.
[3]
C. Hydén.
THE DEVELOPMENT OF A METHOD FOR TRAFFIC SAFETY EVALUATION: THE SWEDISH TRAFFIC CONFLICTS TECHNIQUE
,
1987
.
[4]
Stuart R Perkins,et al.
Traffic conflict characteristics-accident potential at intersections
,
1968
.
[5]
A. Horst.
A time-based analysis of road user behaviour in normal and critical encounters
,
1990
.
[6]
J H Kraay,et al.
DUTCH CONFLICT OBSERVATION TECHNIQUE 'DOCTOR'
,
1988
.
[7]
Ara Van Der Horst.
THE ICTCT CALIBRATION STUDY AT MALMOE: A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF VIDEO RECORDING
,
1984
.
[8]
John C Hayward,et al.
NEAR-MISS DETERMINATION THROUGH USE OF A SCALE OF DANGER
,
1972
.
[9]
S Oppe,et al.
THE MALMOE STUDY: A CALIBRATION OF TRAFFIC CONFLICT TECHNIQUES
,
1984
.
[10]
A.R.A. van der Horst,et al.
Safety measures at railway level crossings and road user behaviour
,
2004
.
[11]
J H Kraay,et al.
THE TRAUTENFELS STUDY: A DIAGNOSIS OF ROAD SAFETY USING THE DUTCH CONFLICT OBSERVATION TECHNIQUE DOCTOR
,
1985
.
[12]
E Hauer,et al.
Research into the validity of the traffic conflicts technique.
,
1986,
Accident; analysis and prevention.
[13]
Brian L Allen,et al.
ANALYSIS OF TRAFFIC CONFLICTS AND COLLISIONS
,
1978
.