Short-term psychological impact of the BRCA1/2 test result in women with breast cancer according to their perceived probability of genetic predisposition to cancer

[1]  C. Isaacs,et al.  Long-Term Psychosocial Outcomes of BRCA1/BRCA2 Testing: Differences across Affected Status and Risk-Reducing Surgery Choice , 2012, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention.

[2]  A. Stiggelbout,et al.  Exploring the short-term impact of DNA-testing in breast cancer patients: the counselees' perception matters, but the actual BRCA1/2 result does not. , 2012, Patient education and counseling.

[3]  G. Dunn,et al.  The perceived personal control (PPC) questionnaire: Reliability and validity in a sample from the United Kingdom , 2012, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[4]  A. Troxel,et al.  Long-term reactions to genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations: does time heal women's concerns? , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  A. Stiggelbout,et al.  Opening the psychological black box in genetic counseling. The psychological impact of DNA testing is predicted by the counselees' perception, the medical impact by the pathogenic or uninformative BRCA1/2‐result , 2012, Psycho-oncology.

[6]  F. Bernier,et al.  Distress and Psychosocial Needs of a Heterogeneous High Risk Familial Cancer Population , 2011, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[7]  D. Evans,et al.  Genetic testing for familial/hereditary breast cancer—comparison of guidelines and recommendations from the UK, France, the Netherlands and Germany , 2011, Journal of Community Genetics.

[8]  R. van Hillegersberg,et al.  Behavioral and psychosocial effects of rapid genetic counseling and testing in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients: Design of a multicenter randomized clinical trial , 2011, BMC Cancer.

[9]  Bernard Asselain,et al.  Is the breast-conserving treatment with radiotherapy appropriate in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers? Long-term results and review of the literature , 2010, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[10]  P. Bennett,et al.  “I have always believed I was at high risk…” The role of expectation in emotional responses to the receipt of an average, moderate or high cancer genetic risk assessment result: a thematic analysis of free-text questionnaire comments , 2010, Familial Cancer.

[11]  Rachel E. Goldsmith,et al.  Distress among women receiving uninformative BRCA1/2 results: 12‐month outcomes , 2009, Psycho-oncology.

[12]  Rachel E. Goldsmith,et al.  Cognitive and emotional factors predicting decisional conflict among high-risk breast cancer survivors who receive uninformative BRCA1/2 results. , 2009, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[13]  J. Hamilton,et al.  Emotional distress following genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a meta-analytic review. , 2009, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[14]  R. Pilarski.  Risk Perception Among Women at Risk for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer , 2009, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[15]  Chris M. R. Smerecnik,et al.  A Systematic Review of the Impact of Genetic Counseling on Risk Perception Accuracy , 2009, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[16]  L. Huiart,et al.  Subjective interpretation of inconclusive BRCA1/2 cancer genetic test results and transmission of information to the relatives , 2009, Psycho-oncology.

[17]  M. Friedlander,et al.  Genetic counselling and testing for inherited gene mutations in newly diagnosed patients with breast cancer: a review of the existing literature and a proposed research agenda , 2008, Breast Cancer Research.

[18]  P. Bennett,et al.  Understanding emotional responses to breast/ovarian cancer genetic risk assessment: An applied test of a cognitive theory of emotion , 2008, Psychology, health & medicine.

[19]  P. Ganz,et al.  The Trajectory of Psychological Impact in BRCA1/2 Genetic Testing: Does Time Heal? , 2008, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[20]  A. Baum,et al.  Psychological distress and quality of life associated with genetic testing for breast cancer risk , 2008, Psycho-oncology.

[21]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Psychological Factors Associated with Emotional Responses to Receiving Genetic Risk Information , 2008, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[22]  M. Ausems,et al.  BRCA1/2 mutation testing in breast cancer patients: a prospective study of the long-term psychological impact of approach during adjuvant radiotherapy , 2007, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[23]  Giovanni Parmigiani,et al.  Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  M. Ausems,et al.  Short term psychological distress in patients actively approached for genetic counselling after diagnosis of breast cancer. , 2006, European journal of cancer.

[25]  W. Otten,et al.  Clinical characteristics affect the impact of an uninformative DNA test result: the course of worry and distress experienced by women who apply for genetic testing for breast cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  J. Klijn,et al.  Experience of parental cancer in childhood is a risk factor for psychological distress during genetic cancer susceptibility testing. , 2006, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[27]  E. Smets,et al.  The perceived personal control (PPC) questionnaire as an outcome of genetic counseling: Reliability and validity of the instrument , 2006, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[28]  B. Meiser,et al.  Psychological impact of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: an update of the literature , 2005, Psycho-oncology.

[29]  J. Simard,et al.  No Evidence of False Reassurance among Women with an Inconclusive BRCA1/2 Genetic Test Result , 2005, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[30]  P. Devilee,et al.  Unclassified variants in disease-causing genes: nonuniformity of genetic testing and counselling, a proposal for guidelines , 2005, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[31]  W. Otten,et al.  What’s the message? Interpretation of an uninformative BRCA1/2 test result for women at risk of familial breast cancer , 2005, Genetics in Medicine.

[32]  W. Otten,et al.  Feeling at risk: How women interpret their familial breast cancer risk , 2004, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[33]  R. Eeles,et al.  Psychosocial impact of breast/ovarian (BRCA1/2) cancer-predictive genetic testing in a UK multi-centre clinical cohort , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[34]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  Psychological distress in women at increased risk for breast cancer: the role of risk perception. , 2004, European journal of cancer.

[35]  E. Legius,et al.  Diagnostic genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in cancer patients: women's looking back on the pre-test period and a psychological evaluation. , 2004, Genetic testing.

[36]  J. Oosterwijk,et al.  Impact of BRCA1/2 testing and disclosure of a positive test result on women affected and unaffected with breast or ovarian cancer , 2004, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[37]  P. Butow,et al.  Psychological impact of genetic testing in women from high-risk breast cancer families. , 2002, European journal of cancer.

[38]  C. Isaacs,et al.  Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing on psychologic distress in a clinic-based sample. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[39]  I. Hickie,et al.  Psychometric properties of the Impact of Event Scale amongst women at increased risk for hereditary breast cancer , 2001, Psycho-oncology.

[40]  P. Hopwood,et al.  Breast cancer risk perception: what do we know and understand? , 2000, Breast Cancer Research.

[41]  A. Howell,et al.  Screening for psychiatric morbidity in patients with advanced breast cancer: validation of two self-report questionnaires. , 1991, British Journal of Cancer.

[42]  N Risch,et al.  Genetic analysis of breast cancer in the cancer and steroid hormone study. , 1991, American journal of human genetics.

[43]  D. Razavi,et al.  Screening for Adjustment Disorders and Major Depressive Disorders in Cancer In-Patients , 1990, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[44]  L. Lin,et al.  A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. , 1989, Biometrics.

[45]  G. Lathrop,et al.  Easy calculations of lod scores and genetic risks on small computers. , 1984, American journal of human genetics.

[46]  S. Thompson.  Will it hurt less if i can control it? A complex answer to a simple question. , 1981 .

[47]  M. Horowitz,et al.  Impact of Event Scale: A Measure of Subjective Stress , 1979, Psychosomatic medicine.

[48]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[49]  J. Saurin,et al.  Cancer patients who experienced diagnostic genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: reactions and behavior after the disclosure of a positive test result. , 2002, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[50]  S. Shiloh,et al.  Perceived personal control (PPC): a new concept in measuring outcome of genetic counseling. , 1999, American journal of medical genetics.

[51]  J. E. Nash,et al.  Psychological responses to BRCA1 mutation testing: preliminary findings. , 1997, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[52]  G. Huston.  The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. , 1987, The Journal of rheumatology.