Ordering adverbs by their scaling effect on adjective intensity

In recent years, theoretical and computational linguistics has paid much attention to linguistic items that form scales. In NLP, much research has focused on ordering adjectives by intensity (tiny < small). Here, we address the task of automatically ordering English adverbs by their intensifying or diminishing effect on adjectives (e.g. extremely small < very small). We experiment with 4 different methods: 1) using the association strength between adverbs and adjectives; 2) exploiting scalar patterns (such as not only X but Y); 3) using the metadata of product reviews; 4) clustering. The method that performs best is based on the use of metadata and ranks adverbs by their scaling factor relative to unmodified adjectives.

[1]  Ted Pedersen,et al.  Fishing for Exactness , 1996, ArXiv.

[2]  Maite Taboada,et al.  Lexicon-Based Methods for Sentiment Analysis , 2011, CL.

[3]  TaboadaMaite,et al.  Lexicon-based methods for sentiment analysis , 2011 .

[4]  L. Hubert,et al.  Comparing partitions , 1985 .

[5]  Bing Liu,et al.  Opinion spam and analysis , 2008, WSDM '08.

[6]  Janyce Wiebe,et al.  Recognizing Contextual Polarity in Phrase-Level Sentiment Analysis , 2005, HLT.

[7]  Carita Paradis.  Adjectives and boundedness , 2001 .

[8]  Michael Wiegand,et al.  Comparing methods for deriving intensity scores for adjectives , 2014, EACL.

[9]  S. Gries,et al.  Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on `alternations' , 2004 .

[10]  G. N. Lance,et al.  Computer Programs for Hierarchical Polythetic Classification ("Similarity Analyses") , 1966, Comput. J..

[11]  Laurence R. Horn,et al.  On the semantic properties of logical operators in english' reproduced by the indiana university lin , 1972 .

[12]  R. Fisher.  On the Interpretation of χ 2 from Contingency Tables , and the Calculation of P Author , 2022 .

[13]  Jan Svartvik,et al.  A __ comprehensive grammar of the English language , 1988 .

[14]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Sentiment in short strength detection informal text , 2010 .

[15]  Silvia Bernardini,et al.  The WaCky wide web: a collection of very large linguistically processed web-crawled corpora , 2009, Lang. Resour. Evaluation.

[16]  Carita Paradis.  Degree Modifiers of Adjectives in Spoken British English , 1997 .

[17]  Diego Reforgiato Recupero,et al.  Sentiment Analysis: Adjectives and Adverbs are Better than Adjectives Alone , 2007, ICWSM.

[18]  J. H. Ward.  Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function , 1963 .

[19]  Christiane Fellbaum,et al.  Large, huge or gigantic? Identifying and encoding intensity relations among adjectives in WordNet , 2013, Lang. Resour. Evaluation.

[20]  Hinrich Schütze,et al.  Introduction to information retrieval , 2008 .

[21]  Marco Guerini,et al.  Assessing Sentiment Strength in Words Prior Polarities , 2012, COLING.

[22]  Christopher Potts,et al.  Learning the meaning of scalar adjectives , 2010 .

[23]  Oliver Schütz,et al.  A generic approach to generate opinion lists of phrases for opinion mining applications , 2012, WISDOM '12.

[24]  R. Fisher.  On the Interpretation of χ2 from Contingency Tables, and the Calculation of P , 2018, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society).

[25]  B. Erman.  There is no such thing as a free combination: a usage-based study of specific construals in adverb–adjective combinations1 , 2014, English Language and Linguistics.

[26]  Lawrence Hubert,et al.  Phipps Arabie 1948–2011 , 2012, J. Classif..

[27]  Gerard de Melo,et al.  Good, Great, Excellent: Global Inference of Semantic Intensities , 2013, Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics.

[28]  Roberto V. Zicari,et al.  A phrase-based opinion list for the German language , 2012, KONVENS.