Validation of a Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) System Designed for Patients with Disorders of Consciousness (DOC): Regular and Sham Testing with Healthy Participants

Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology is increasingly used to research new methods to provide assessment and communication for patients diagnosed with a disorder of consciousness (DOC). As this technology advances, it could lead to tools that could support clinical diagnoses, provide communication to some persons who cannot otherwise communicate, and further impact families, friends, and carers. Hence, validation studies are needed to ensure that BCI systems that are intended for these patients operate as expected. This study aimed to validate different components of a hardware and software platform that is being used for research with patients with DOC called mindBEAGLE. This real-time EEG system uses four different paradigms for assessment and communication. We assessed regular and sham conditions with healthy participants and report on the resulting EEG data and BCI performance results.

[1]  Qiuyou Xie,et al.  An Auditory BCI System for Assisting CRS-R Behavioral Assessment in Patients with Disorders of Consciousness , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[2]  Brendan Z. Allison,et al.  P300 brain computer interface: current challenges and emerging trends , 2012, Front. Neuroeng..

[3]  Ganesh R. Naik,et al.  Emerging Theory and Practice in Neuroprosthetics , 2014 .

[4]  Sung Chan Jun,et al.  Steady-State Somatosensory Evoked Potential for Brain-Computer Interface—Present and Future , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[5]  Brendan Z. Allison,et al.  Workload assessment of computer gaming using a single-stimulus event-related potential paradigm , 2008, Biological Psychology.

[6]  Brendan Z. Allison,et al.  Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness , 2017, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[7]  Steven Laureys,et al.  How should functional imaging of patients with disorders of consciousness contribute to their clinical rehabilitation needs? , 2006, Current opinion in neurology.

[8]  J. Giacino,et al.  Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: evidentiary support for hierarchical grading of level of consciousness. , 2014, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[9]  Brendan Z. Allison.  The I of BCIs: Next Generation Interfaces for Brain-Computer Interface Systems That Adapt to Individual Users , 2009, HCI.

[10]  Steven Laureys,et al.  A vibrotactile P300-based BCI for consciousness detection and communication , 2014 .

[11]  Chris P. Brennan,et al.  An SSVEP and Eye Tracking Hybrid BNCI: Potential Beyond Communication and Control , 2016, HCI.

[12]  Srivas Chennu,et al.  Bedside detection of awareness in the vegetative state: a cohort study , 2011, The Lancet.

[13]  José del R. Millán,et al.  BNCI Horizon 2020: Towards a Roadmap for the BCI Community , 2015 .

[14]  Brendan Z. Allison,et al.  Brain–computer interfacing: more than the sum of its parts , 2012, Soft Computing.

[15]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  How many people are able to operate an EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI)? , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[16]  Jeffrey G Malins,et al.  Neuroimage: Clinical the Reliability of the N400 in Single Subjects: Implications for Patients with Disorders of Consciousness , 2022 .

[17]  J. Polich,et al.  P300 amplitude is determined by target-to-target interval. , 2002, Psychophysiology.

[18]  Jonathan R. Wolpaw,et al.  Brain–Computer InterfacesPrinciples and Practice , 2012 .

[19]  Lorina Naci,et al.  Somatosensory attention identifies both overt and covert awareness in disorders of consciousness , 2016, Annals of neurology.

[20]  Brendan Z. Allison,et al.  The Hybrid BCI , 2010, Frontiers in Neuroscience.

[21]  José del R. Millán,et al.  Recent and Upcoming BCI progress: Overview, Analysis, and Recommendations , 2012 .

[22]  M. Boly,et al.  Willful modulation of brain activity in disorders of consciousness. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Brain-computer communication: unlocking the locked in. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  Ithabi S. Gantner,et al.  A Vibrotactile P300-Based Brain–Computer Interface for Consciousness Detection and Communication , 2014, Clinical EEG and neuroscience.

[25]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[26]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Electrical and magnetic readings of mental functions , 1997 .

[27]  Laura Astolfi,et al.  On ERPs detection in disorders of consciousness rehabilitation , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[28]  K. Andrews,et al.  Misdiagnosis of the vegetative state: retrospective study in a rehabilitation unit , 1996, BMJ.