Comparative analysis of the efficacy of different treatments for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a retrospectively real-world study

BACKGROUND This study aimed to explore the clinical efficacy of different treatment regimens for idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN). METHODS Patients with IMN were retrospectively analyzed by dividing into two groups: glucocorticoids combined with cyclophosphamide group (GC + CYC) and glucocorticoids combined with calcineurin inhibitor group (GC + CNIs). After 1 year of treatment, those who found that the initial treatment was not effective were switched to another regimen. Patients continued to be followed up for at least 1 year to observe the treatment effects of different treatment regimens. RESULTS This study found that the rate of complete and partial remission (CR + PR) in the GC + CYC and GC + CNIs groups was 76.19% vs 82.63% after one year of follow-up (P > 0.05). In the GC + CYC and GC + CNIs groups, 27.78% and 11.95% of the patients switched treatment regimens, respectively. After two years of follow-up, the CR + PR rate was significantly higher in the change to GC + CNIs group after the switch compared to before the switch (80.00% vs 31.43%, P < 0.001). It was also significantly higher in the change to GC + CYC group compared to before the switch (68.42% vs 31.58%, P = 0.023). The recurrence rate was significantly higher in the maintain GC + CNIs and change to GC + CNIs groups than in the maintain GC + CYC and change to GC + CYC groups (25.14% vs 6.36%, P < 0.001). The disengagement rate from immunotherapy was significantly higher in the maintain GC + CYC group and the change to GC + CYC group than in the maintain GC + CNIs group and the change to GC + CNIs group (76.36% vs 28.00%, P < 0.001). High titer of anti-phospholipase A2 receptor (anti-PLA2R) antibody (95%CI: 0.199-0.947, P = 0.036) and serum C3 (95%CI: 0.030-0.570, P = 0.007) were independent risk factors, while serum IgG (95%CI: 1.000-1.331, P = 0.050) was a favorable factor for achieving CR. Anti-PLA2R antibody was the independent risk factor that affected the worse renal condition (P = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS Timely change of treatment regimen can significantly enhance therapeutic effect. Compared with patients administered with CYC, those administered with CNIs were less likely to leave treatment and had a higher recurrence rate.

[1]  S. Boyer-Suavet,et al.  Advances in the Management of Primary Membranous Nephropathy and Rituximab-Refractory Membranous Nephropathy , 2022, Frontiers in Immunology.

[2]  Wen-Ting Yan,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of Different Immunosuppressive Therapies in Patients With Membranous Nephropathy and High PLA2R Antibody Titer , 2022, Frontiers in Pharmacology.

[3]  Rong Wang,et al.  The optimal anti-phospholipase A2 receptor cutoff for the diagnosis of idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a single-center retrospective study , 2020, The Korean journal of internal medicine.

[4]  Li-yan Yang,et al.  sPLA2-IB Level Correlates with Hyperlipidemia and the Prognosis of Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy , 2020, Current Medical Science.

[5]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Retrospective study: clinicopathological features and prognosis of idiopathic membranous nephropathy with seronegative anti-phospholipase A2 receptor antibody , 2020, PeerJ.

[6]  Gaosi Xu,et al.  Effectiveness and safety of cyclophosphamide or tacrolimus therapy for idiopathic membranous nephropathy , 2020, Internal medicine journal.

[7]  F. Wang,et al.  Complement activation products in the circulation and urine of primary membranous nephropathy , 2019, BMC Nephrology.

[8]  Ying Xu,et al.  Clinical and pathological features of idiopathic membranous nephropathy with focal segmental sclerosis , 2019, BMC Nephrology.

[9]  Yung-Ming Chen,et al.  The relationship of anti-phospholipase A2 receptor antibody and C5a complement with disease activity and short-term outcome in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. , 2019, Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi.

[10]  Sohee Oh,et al.  Factors affecting the long-term outcomes of idiopathic membranous nephropathy , 2017, BMC Nephrology.

[11]  T. H. Yeh,et al.  Membranous nephropathy: a review on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. , 2015, Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi.

[12]  Shouliang Hu,et al.  Diagnostic value of phospholipase A2 receptor in idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2014, Journal of Nephrology.

[13]  S. Agarwal,et al.  Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in idiopathic membranous glomerulonephritis: a clinico-pathological and stereological study. , 2010, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[14]  J. Luño,et al.  Tacrolimus monotherapy in membranous nephropathy: a randomized controlled trial. , 2007, Kidney international.

[15]  G. Hill,et al.  Clinical and morphological prognostic factors in membranous nephropathy: significance of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. , 2003, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[16]  J. Wetzels,et al.  Prognostic factors in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. , 1998, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[17]  A. Magil,et al.  Focal glomerulosclerosis in idiopathic membranous glomerulonephritis. , 1992, Kidney international.

[18]  K. Konishi,et al.  Idiopathic membranous glomerulonephritis: aspects of geographical differences. , 1986, Journal of clinical pathology.