An advancing investigation on reduct and consistency for decision tables in Variable Precision Rough Set models

Variable Precision Rough Set (VPRS) model is one of the most important extensions of the Classical Rough Set (RS) theory. It employs a majority inclusion relation mechanism in order to make the Classical RS model become more fault tolerant, and therefore the generalization of the model is improved. This paper can be viewed as an extension of previous investigations on attribution reduction problem in VPRS model. In our investigation, we illustrated with examples that the previously proposed reduct definitions may spoil the hidden classification ability of a knowledge system by ignoring certian essential attributes in some circumstances. Consequently, by proposing a new β-consistent notion, we analyze the relationship between the structures of Decision Table (DT) and different definitions of reduct in VPRS model. Then we give a new notion of β-complement reduct that can avoid the defects of reduct notions defined in previous literatures. We also supply the method to obtain the β- complement reduct using a decision table splitting algorithm, and finally demonstrate the feasibility of our approach with sample instances.

[1]  Ken Kaneiwa,et al.  A rough set approach to multiple dataset analysis , 2011, Appl. Soft Comput..

[2]  Wei Cheng,et al.  Comparative study of variable precision rough set model and graded rough set model , 2012, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[3]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  A Comparative Study of Fuzzy Sets and Rough Sets , 1998 .

[4]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  Three-way decisions with probabilistic rough sets , 2010, Inf. Sci..

[5]  Sun Chen,et al.  A variable precision rough set based modeling method for pulsed GTAW , 2008 .

[6]  Nick Cercone,et al.  Discovering rules for water demand prediction: An enhanced rough-set approach☆ , 1996 .

[7]  Duoqian Miao,et al.  Analysis on attribute reduction strategies of rough set , 1998, Journal of Computer Science and Technology.

[8]  Masahiro Inuiguchi Attribute Reduction in Variable Precision Rough Set Model , 2006, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[9]  Jerzy W. Grzymala-Busse,et al.  Rough Sets , 1995, Commun. ACM.

[10]  James Nga-Kwok Liu,et al.  A set covering based approach to find the reduct of variable precision rough set , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[11]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Rudiments of rough sets , 2007, Inf. Sci..

[12]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  The Discernibility Matrices and Functions in Information Systems , 1992, Intelligent Decision Support.

[13]  M. Beynon,et al.  Variable precision rough set theory and data discretisation: an application to corporate failure prediction , 2001 .

[14]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Rough set methods in feature selection and recognition , 2003, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[15]  Wojciech Ziarko,et al.  Variable Precision Rough Sets with Asymmetric Bounds , 1993, RSKD.

[16]  Wojciech Ziarko,et al.  Variable Precision Rough Set Model , 1993, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[17]  Malcolm J. Beynon,et al.  Reducts within the variable precision rough sets model: A further investigation , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Jie Zhou,et al.  β-Interval attribute reduction in variable precision rough set model , 2011, Soft Comput..

[19]  Zdzislaw Pawlak,et al.  Rough sets and decision tables , 1984, Symposium on Computation Theory.

[20]  K. Thangavel,et al.  Dimensionality reduction based on rough set theory: A review , 2009, Appl. Soft Comput..

[21]  Jie Zhou,et al.  Research of reduct features in the variable precision rough set model , 2009, Neurocomputing.

[22]  Wei-Zhi Wu,et al.  Approaches to knowledge reduction based on variable precision rough set model , 2004, Inf. Sci..

[23]  Wei-Zhi Wu,et al.  Generalized fuzzy rough sets , 2003, Inf. Sci..