Reasons for dropout from cardiac rehabilitation programs in women: A qualitative study

Background Empirical evidence has shown that cardiac rehabilitation programs are effective in reducing morbidity and mortality, improving quality of life in patients with cardiovascular disease. Despite the benefits, women have a high cardiac rehabilitation dropout rate. Our aim was to explore women’s perceptions about the reasons they faced for dropout from these programs. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with women (n = 10) after dropping out from three different cardiac rehabilitation centers in Spain. In addition, a focus group and a semi-structured interview with cardiovascular professionals were conducted. From a grounded theory perspective, thematic analysis was used to derive themes from interview transcripts. Results The women were between 41 and 70 years. We identified five general themes that illustrated reasons for cardiac rehabilitation dropout: intrapersonal reasons (self-reported health, self-reported mental health, health beliefs); interpersonal reasons (family caregiver role, work conflicts); logistical reasons (transport, distance); cardiac rehabilitation program characteristics (perception of the objective of cardiac rehabilitation, exercise component, inconvenient timing, cardiac rehabilitation equipment); and health system reasons (financial assistance for transport, long waiting list). The cardiovascular professionals found barriers to cardiac rehabilitation completion similar to those found by the women. Conclusions In order to prevent cardiac rehabilitation dropout in women, modular and flexible programs are needed. In addition, the inclusion of primary care centers or community resources could improve cardiac rehabilitation completion in women. Psychological assessment and counseling during cardiac rehabilitation should be included as an essential part of the programs and recommended for those women with depressive symptoms. Finally, improved financial assistance for transport from the health system is essential.

[1]  Faha,et al.  Aha Guideline Effectiveness-based Guidelines for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Women—2011 Update a Guideline from the American Heart Association Executive Writing Committee Expert Panel Members Cvd Risk Assessment Table 1. Class Iii Interventions (not Useful/effective and May Be Harmfu , 2022 .

[2]  F. Lopez‐Jimenez,et al.  Cardiac Rehabilitation for Women: A Systematic Review of Barriers and Solutions , 2017, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[3]  M. Rubio-Valera,et al.  Barriers for Nonparticipation and Dropout of Women in Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs: A Systematic Review. , 2017, Journal of women's health.

[4]  P. Sainsbury,et al.  Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. , 2007, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[5]  M. Fornage,et al.  Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association , 2017, Circulation.

[6]  E. Barrett-Connor,et al.  Sex/gender differences in cardiovascular disease prevention: what a difference a decade makes. , 2011, Circulation.

[7]  Vera Bittner,et al.  Core components of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs: 2007 update: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention Committee, the Council on Clinical Cardiology; the Councils on Cardiovascular Nursing, Epidemiology and Pr , 2007, Circulation.

[8]  M. Lauer,et al.  Cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology (Subcommittee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention) and the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Su , 2005, Circulation.

[9]  Stefan Störk,et al.  EUROASPIRE IV: A European Society of Cardiology survey on the lifestyle, risk factor and therapeutic management of coronary patients from 24 European countries , 2016, European journal of preventive cardiology.

[10]  S. Allender,et al.  Cardiovascular disease in Europe , 2009, European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation : official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology.

[11]  J. Begiristáin,et al.  Predictors of Enrollment in Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs in Spain , 2015, Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention.

[12]  R. Edwards,et al.  Exploring Uptake of Cardiac Rehabilitation in a Minority Ethnic Population in England: A Qualitative Study , 2010, European journal of cardiovascular nursing : journal of the Working Group on Cardiovascular Nursing of the European Society of Cardiology.

[13]  D. Chyun,et al.  Barriers to Cardiac Rehabilitation in Women With Cardiovascular Disease: An Integrative Review , 2011, The Journal of cardiovascular nursing.

[14]  John Spertus,et al.  AHA/ACCF Secondary Prevention and Risk Reduction Therapy for Patients with Coronary and other Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease: 2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology Foundation. , 2011, Circulation.

[15]  Sharon-Lise T Normand,et al.  Use of Cardiac Rehabilitation by Medicare Beneficiaries After Myocardial Infarction or Coronary Bypass Surgery , 2007, Circulation.

[16]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2011, Circulation.

[17]  J. McSweeney,et al.  An act of courage: women's decision-making processes regarding outpatient cardiac rehabilitation attendance. , 2001, Rehabilitation nursing : the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses.

[18]  S. Jaglal,et al.  Factors influencing participation in cardiac rehabilitation programmes after referral and initial attendance: qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis , 2013, Clinical rehabilitation.

[19]  R. Arena,et al.  Increasing Referral and Participation Rates to Outpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation: The Valuable Role of Healthcare Professionals in the Inpatient and Home Health Settings A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association , 2012, Circulation.

[20]  Sarah Sherwood,et al.  Influences on women's completion of a cardiac rehabilitation programme , 2011 .

[21]  S. Grace,et al.  Narrative review comparing the benefits of and participation in cardiac rehabilitation in high-, middle- and low-income countries. , 2015, Heart, lung & circulation.

[22]  I. Piña,et al.  Core Components of Cardiac Rehabilitation/Secondary Prevention Programs: Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association and the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation , 2000 .

[23]  P. Scarborough,et al.  Cardiovascular disease in Europe 2014: epidemiological update. , 2014, European heart journal.

[24]  Alberto Ruano-Ravina,et al.  Participation and adherence to cardiac rehabilitation programs. A systematic review. , 2016, International journal of cardiology.

[25]  Rowena J Dolor,et al.  Effectiveness-based guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in women--2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  A. Villablanca,et al.  Advances in Cardiovascular Health in Women over the Past Decade: Guideline Recommendations for Practice. , 2017, Journal of women's health.

[27]  Vera Bittner,et al.  Core components of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs: 2007 update. , 2007, The Journal of cardiovascular nursing.

[28]  Janet S. Wright,et al.  Increasing Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation From 20% to 70%: A Road Map From the Million Hearts Cardiac Rehabilitation Collaborative , 2017, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[29]  Rod S. Taylor,et al.  Cochrane corner: cardiac rehabilitation for people with heart disease , 2015, Heart.

[30]  angesichts der Corona-Pandemie,et al.  UPDATE , 1973, The Lancet.